정철원 이혼 김지연, 거짓말에 참다 폭발 oh.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

김지연은 일부러 시댁 얘기는 안 했는데 어쩌려고. 그래서 화제의 정철원♥김지연 부부는 누구. Days ago 아내가 직접 불화 사실을 밝힌 롯데 자이언츠 투수 정철원 27이 말을 아꼈다. 이런 부부 정말 있었네연9500만원 벌고도.

정철원과 김지연 이야기, 첫 데이트 성공 전략.

러브캐처 김지연, 정철원과 결혼식 한 달만 이혼한다 가출 후 양육권 소송 스포츠조선 51분 전.

선수의 사생활이지만 롯데 자이언츠 구단도 상황을 예의.. 젼쏘굿이 인스스 올리고 난뒤에 정철원 지인으로 추정되는.. 정철원과 김지연에 대한 이야기를 통해 감동적인 선수의 순간과 첫 데이트 성공 팁을 알아보세요.. 최근 디시 등 온라인 커뮤니티를 중심으로 한기주의 근황과..

Days Ago 김지연 정철원 김지연정철원 정철원이혼 김지연폭로 연예인사생활 프로야구선수논란 시댁갈등 양육권분쟁 연예계이슈 김지연 정철원 김지연정철원 정철원이혼 김지연폭로 연예인사생활 프로야구선수논란 시댁갈등 양육권분쟁 연예계이슈 0.

Kr › Read › Entertain러브캐처 김지연, 남편 정철원 폭로&mldr.

Days ago 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 러브캐처 출신 김지연이 남편인 프로야구 선수 정철원롯데 자이언츠과의 파경을 암시한 가운데 시댁과의 갈등을 폭로했다. Days ago 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 러브캐처 출신 김지연이 남편인 프로야구 선수 정철원롯데 자이언츠과의 파경을 암시한 가운데 시댁과의 갈등을 폭로했다. 썸녀에게 전화 걸어서김남국, 연애비법 전수 무슨 일, Com › zumzany › 224163434126김지연 정철원 시댁폭로 러브캐쳐부터 혼전임신까지 다시 보이는 것들. Mnet 연애 프로그램 러브캐처에 출연했던 김지연이 롯데 자이언츠 소속 야구선수 정철원과 오는 12월 결혼식을 올린다. 한편 아내인 김지연이 sns를 통해 본인 개인사를 지나치게 외부에 알리는 것에 대해 피로감을 느끼는 의견도 있다.

sexbjcam korea Days ago 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 osen김채연 기자 ‘러브캐처’ 출연자 김지연이 야구선수 정철원과 파경을 암시한 가운데, 지난해 그가 올린 ‘연락두절’ sns가 재조명되고 있다. 지난 26일 김지연은 자신의 인스타그램 스토리를 통해 장문을 글을 게재했다. 연애 예능 프로그램에 출연했던 정철원 아내 김지연은 지난 24일 자신의 sns를 통해 정철원과의 불화를 고백하며 이혼 소송을 준비 중이라고 밝혔습니다. 소셜미디어 마이데일리 곽명동 기자mnet 예능 프로그램 ‘러브캐처’ 출신 인플루언서 김지연29과 파경설에 휩싸인 롯데 자이언츠 투수 정철원26이 입장을 밝혔다. 고교 시절 성적만 보면 무조건 15번 이내에 지명될 만했기 때문. seouldoll 유출

rimu yumino pikpak 입력 20260125 200000 수정 20260125 195742. Com › kokr › news김지연 추가 폭로→입 연 정철원 이혼소송중&mldr. 김지연은 지난 24일 팬들과 sns를 통해 ‘무엇이든 물어보세요’ 시간을 가지며 질의응답을. Mnet ‘러브캐처’ 시즌1 출연자 김지연28이 혼전임신과 함께 결혼 소식을 전했다. Days ago 파경 예고 김지연, 정철원 폭로 전 꿰뚫어 본 무당 뒷북치면서 자책한다 20260127 080100 문지현 기자 fullpride@mydaily. seoyeon4cuckold

savetwittervideo 과거 러브캐처에 출연해 이채운과 열애 소식을 알렸던 김지연이 야구선수 정철원과 혼전임신 한 사실을 고백해 화제입니다. 정철원, 드디어 입 열었다 명예와 삶 무너지는 것 같아. Days ago 파경 예고 김지연, 정철원 폭로 전 꿰뚫어 본 무당 뒷북치면서 자책한다 20260127 080100 문지현 기자 fullpride@mydaily. 11일 김지연은 자신의 인스타그램에 더 일찍 알려드리고 싶었지만 혹시나 하는 마음에 안정기까지 지켜보다 3개월이 훌쩍 지났다며 아직 많이 부족하지만 소중한 생명을 갑자기 맞이하고 싶진 않아 계획하게 됐고. 고향이 잘 알려지지 않았다가 남편인 정철원의 롯데 자이언츠 이적 당시 유튜브 크보5프너 채널과 본인 인스타그램 스토리를 통해 거제시 출신임이 밝혀. simptown.su porn

simptown.cr 썸녀에게 전화 걸어서김남국, 연애비법 전수 무슨 일. 고향이 잘 알려지지 않았다가 남편인 정철원의 롯데 자이언츠 이적 당시 유튜브 크보5프너 채널과 본인 인스타그램 스토리를 통해 거제시 출신임이 밝혀. 아들 돌반지 녹여 본인 목걸이로 롯데 정철원 폭로파경 위기. 9 결박 후 10발 쐈다 이민당국 충격 영상총격범 몰던 트럼프. Days ago 서울뉴시스전재경 기자 엠넷 러브캐처 출신 김지연이 남편인 프로야구 선수 정철원롯데 자이언츠과 갈등을 언급하며 시댁 문제까지.

riley mae twitter 11일 김지연은 자신의 인스타그램에 더 일찍 알려드리고 싶었지만 혹시나 하는 마음에 안정기까지 지켜보다 3개월이 훌쩍 지났다며 아직 많이 부족하지만 소중한 생명을 갑자기 맞이하고 싶진 않아 계획하게 됐고. 공개 발언이 이어지는 만큼 여론의 관심도 당분간 계속될 전망이다. 아들 돌반지 녹여 본인 목걸이로 롯데 정철원 폭로파경 위기. 9 결박 후 10발 쐈다 이민당국 충격 영상총격범 몰던 트럼프. Days ago 김지연 정철원 김지연정철원 정철원이혼 김지연폭로 연예인사생활 프로야구선수논란 시댁갈등 양육권분쟁 연예계이슈 김지연 정철원 김지연정철원 정철원이혼 김지연폭로 연예인사생활 프로야구선수논란 시댁갈등 양육권분쟁 연예계이슈 0.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.