Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Cn › weather › 101270101成都天气预报,成都7天天气预报,成都15天天气预报,成都天气查询. 成都15天天气信息 四川省成都市最近15天日最高气温平均温度为10. Cn › chengdu15tian四川成都天气预报15天查询（半个月）_气象网. 成都15天天气信息 四川省成都市最近15天日最高气温平均温度为10.

Lalalin010

Com › chengdu › 56294成都天气预报成都天气预报一周,15天,30天天气查询2345天气预报.. 成都近期的天气预报15天 0002 今天是2026年的1月26号，在成都的必打卡地宽窄巷子播报一下今天的天气情况。今天最高温度15度，最低温度2度。..

Korea Femdom Twitter

Days ago 天气网提供重庆天气预报15天,30天,今日天气,明天天气,重庆未来一周的天气预报,重庆天气,重庆实时天气查询,重庆天气预报一周,7天,10天,40天的天气情况。旅游出行,从天气网开始！, Com › province › sichuan四川天气预报四川一周天气预报,四川天气预报15天,30天,40天天气预. 卫星云图 气象灾害预警 环境气象公报 降水量预报 天气公报 每日天气提示 城市天气预报 一带一路气象服务, 成都15天天气信息 四川省成都市最近15天日最高气温平均温度为10.

Korea Cfnm

Cn › weather › 101270101成都天气预报,成都7天天气预报,成都15天天气预报,成都天气查询. Days ago 成都天气网提供成都天气预报15天，成都天气预报15天查询，成都未来15天天气预报，通过成都天气预报15天查询，及时了解成都各地区未来15天的天气状况，温度，降水量，风向等。助您放心出行旅游。, 成都市气象局30日星期五 7时预计，成都今日天气阴转晴，最低气温1℃，最高气温11℃，无持续风向, Com › sichuan_dz › 35四川天气预报7天,10天,15天,未来一周四川天气预报查询_2345天气预报.

0122 星期四, 阴, 9°4°, 良, Com › chengdu › 15成都天气预报15天_成都天气预报15天查询,成都未来15天天气预报 成都. Cn › mweather › 101270101成都天气预报成都天气预报一周_成都天气预报7天、15天、40天天查. Cn › weather › 101270101成都天气预报,成都7天天气预报,成都15天天气预报,成都天气查询. 0119 星期一, 阴, 12°9°, 良. 815天预报属于客观预报产品，反映的是未来天气变化趋势、请随时关注最新预报 815天预报，是集合多家全球数值天气预报模式客观预报产品加工而成，未经预报员主观订正，反映未来一段时间内天气变化趋势，具有一定的.

Kurama Pikpak

全市日最高气温将从18℃下降到8℃，降幅10℃左右。期间，我市平坝地区有分散小雨，21日凌晨到早上有出现分散雨夹雪的可能；山区有雨夹雪或小雪，部分路段有道路结冰。全市伴有3～5级 read more.. Com › province › sichuan四川天气预报四川一周天气预报,四川天气预报15天,30天,40天天气预.. Com › chengdu › 56294成都天气预报成都天气预报一周,15天,30天天气查询2345天气预报.. 5日（周四） 蓝天预报综合天气现象、能见度、空气质量等因子，预测未来一周的天空状况。 天空蔚蓝 可见透彻蓝天，或有蓝天白云美景。 天空淡蓝 天空不够清澈，以浅蓝色为主。..

Cn › publish › forecast成都天气预报. Com › sichuan › 15四川天气预报15天查询_四川未来半个月天气预报情况_实时天气网. Days ago 成都15天天气 最新四川省成都市15天天气，包含每天最高气温、最低气温、天气状况及风向等天气信息.

0121 星期三, 阴, 8°4°, 优. Com › weather15d › 27四川天气预报15天_四川天气预报15天查询四川未来15天天气,四川未. 全市日最高气温将从18℃下降到8℃，降幅10℃左右。期间，我市平坝地区有分散小雨，21日凌晨到早上有出现分散雨夹雪的可能；山区有雨夹雪或小雪，部分路段有道路结冰。全市伴有3～5级 read more. 0122 星期四, 阴, 9°4°, 良, 四川省主要城市天气预报查询 提供四川省所属市、区、县、地区未来15天天气预报，包含每天最高气温、最低气温、天气状况.

ks오토플랜 논란 Cn › publish › forecast成都天气预报. Cn › mweather › 101270101成都天气预报成都天气预报一周_成都天气预报7天、15天、40天天查. 全市日最高气温将从18℃下降到8℃，降幅10℃左右。期间，我市平坝地区有分散小雨，21日凌晨到早上有出现分散雨夹雪的可能；山区有雨夹雪或小雪，部分路段有道路结冰。全市伴有3～5级 read more. Days ago 成都天气网提供成都天气预报15天，成都天气预报15天查询，成都未来15天天气预报，通过成都天气预报15天查询，及时了解成都各地区未来15天的天气状况，温度，降水量，风向等。助您放心出行旅游。. Cn › chengdu15tian四川成都天气预报15天查询（半个月）_气象网. kr8.ddal.cyz

korbolt twitter 0120 星期二, 阴, 8°6°, 优. Cn › mweather › 101270101成都天气预报成都天气预报一周_成都天气预报7天、15天、40天天查. 0119 星期一, 阴, 12°9°, 良. Com › sichuan_dz › 35四川天气预报7天,10天,15天,未来一周四川天气预报查询_2345天气预报. 成都市气象局30日星期五 7时预计，成都今日天气阴转晴，最低气温1℃，最高气温11℃，无持续风向 leeae 야동

kuromotokun pixiv 5日（周四） 蓝天预报综合天气现象、能见度、空气质量等因子，预测未来一周的天空状况。 天空蔚蓝 可见透彻蓝天，或有蓝天白云美景。 天空淡蓝 天空不够清澈，以浅蓝色为主。. Com › sichuan › 15四川天气预报15天查询_四川未来半个月天气预报情况_实时天气网. 成都天气网提供成都天气预报10天，成都天气预报10天查询，成都未来10天天气预报，通过成都天气预报10天查询，及时了解成都各地区未来10天的天气状况，温度，降水量，风向等。助您放心出行旅游。. Days ago 快速准确的四川省成都市天气预报,15天天气预报和气象趋势预测,每天最高气温、最低气温、天气状况、风向等主要指标. Days ago 成都15天天气 最新四川省成都市15天天气，包含每天最高气温、最低气温、天气状况及风向等天气信息. kuzu y

korean bj 엘리 Com › weather15d › 27四川天气预报15天_四川天气预报15天查询四川未来15天天气,四川未. 0122 星期四, 阴, 9°4°, 良. Cn › chengdu15tian四川成都天气预报15天查询（半个月）_气象网. 5日（周四） 蓝天预报综合天气现象、能见度、空气质量等因子，预测未来一周的天空状况。 天空蔚蓝 可见透彻蓝天，或有蓝天白云美景。 天空淡蓝 天空不够清澈，以浅蓝色为主。. Com › chengdu › 56294成都天气预报成都天气预报一周,15天,30天天气查询2345天气预报.

korean handsome gay cam Com › sichuan › 15四川天气预报15天查询_四川未来半个月天气预报情况_实时天气网. 气象网为您提供关于成都天气预报15天，包含未来成都天气预报15天查询 半个月的服务。. Days ago 天气网提供重庆天气预报15天,30天,今日天气,明天天气,重庆未来一周的天气预报,重庆天气,重庆实时天气查询,重庆天气预报一周,7天,10天,40天的天气情况。旅游出行,从天气网开始！. Days ago 成都市的实时天气状况，成都天气预报24小时详情分阶段统计图。未来十五天天气数据列表内含成都天气预报一周查询，以及成都市每天的空气质量、湿度、风向风力、降雨量等详细数据查询。. 0120 星期二, 阴, 8°6°, 优.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.