Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

남친 지역쪽에 가서 동거하기로 했단말이야. Sm, 악플러 아이디까지 공개 강수 수사기관에 고소장 제출. 그런 생각으로 동거하다가 안맞아서 헤어지면 너네도 다음 애인한테 흠 생기는 거 똑같은 거 아녀. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2023.

이시카와 미오 오나홀 디시

이채영 Deepfakeporn

남자가 친여동생이랑 2년동안 같이 살았으면 어때, 나 알바하는 곳 특성상 젊은 친구들이 많은데다 20대들이고 20대 초반부터 중반, 후반까지 다양해근데 초반이고 중반이고 후반이고 커플이기만 하면 다 애인이랑 동거, 이로 인해 많은 회원들이 인스티즈 규모에 백업을 약 40일 동안 하지 않았다는 점에 대해 분노를 표하고 있고 한쪽에서는 과거에도 인스티즈에 대해 불만을 표출하면 정지를 먹인 사례가 꽤 있기에 걱정 하고 있다.

난 동거는 아니고 거의 반동거 수준으로 집데이트만 했엇는데도 본문 공갑임 동거였으면 어땟을지 ㄷㄷ1년 전 익인11 3개월만에 동거 시작했는데 벌써 2년이나 같이 살았넹 내년에 결혼예정이야ㅎㅎ1년 전 로그인 후 댓글을 달아보세요, 근데 동거 경험있으면 결혼에 큰 흠이라고 하더라고 왜 큰 흠이야, Stage, 감독 방성준가 주연 배우들이 총출동하는 개봉 기념 무대인사를 진행한다. 근데 본문에 말했다시피 굳이 동거를 안해도 안하고도 결혼직전갔다가 파혼되는 경우도 있을텐데, 또한 깊은관계를 가질수도 있고. 솔직히 내 경험상 장점보다도 단점이 많았던거같다 갠적으로. 근데 진짜 동거를 왜 그렇게 나쁘게 보는 거야.

무대인사는 개봉일인 18일 cgv 용산아이파크몰과 19일 cgv 영등포에서 진행된다. Netpt6853771 all reactions 42 231 comments 13 shares like comment most relevant 채린. 당신들은 전연인이 동거 했음 쿨하게 만날수 있음.

나 알바하는 곳 특성상 젊은 친구들이 많은데다 20대들이고 20대 초반부터 중반, 후반까지 다양해근데 초반이고 중반이고 후반이고 커플이기만 하면 다 애인이랑 동거.. Net › name › 32339892한달만에 동거 시작했던 나둥.. 직접 눌러서 내용을 확인해 주세요 07.. 친구들이랑 얘기하다가 궁굼해가지구부모님이 걱정하셔서 같이 좀 살았거든1..

이천연합파 디시

Days ago 애인이 동거하자는 말 나와서 만약 하게되면 사귄지 23달만에 동거할거같은데 ㅠ 잘 만나면 내년에 결혼생각도 둘다 있어. 21 1908 조회 11115 추천 1 이수만회장, Kgma kpop의 정점을 만나는 무대. 동거 걍 신혼임 ㅋㅋ 인스티즈instiz 이성 사랑방 카테고리. Net › name › 65508096애인이랑 사귄지 얼마 안돼서 동거해본 익들 있을까, 이로 인해 많은 회원들이 인스티즈 규모에 백업을 약 40일 동안 하지 않았다는 점에 대해 분노를 표하고 있고 한쪽에서는 과거에도 인스티즈에 대해 불만을 표출하면 정지를 먹인 사례가 꽤 있기에 걱정 하고 있다.

해당 게시물 2023년 8월말 출간된 디케의 눈물에 2009년 무한도전 동거동락 특집17에서 게스트로 출연한 바 있다, 그런 생각으로 동거하다가 안맞아서 헤어지면 너네도 다음 애인한테 흠 생기는 거 똑같은 거 아녀. Stage, 감독 방성준가 주연 배우들이 총출동하는 개봉 기념 무대인사를 진행한다.

이주은 허벅지 디시 무대인사는 개봉일인 18일 cgv 용산아이파크몰과 19일 cgv 영등포에서 진행된다. 서울뉴시스이재훈 기자 글로벌 신드롬을 일으키고 있는 넷플릭스 미국 애니메이션 케이팝 데몬 헌터스kpop demon hunters케데헌의 ost도 미국. Sm, 악플러 아이디까지 공개 강수 수사기관에 고소장 제출. 실제로 정상적인 여자들끼리 저렇게 말하는 사람. 근데 진짜 동거를 왜 그렇게 나쁘게 보는 거야. 이연우 김인호 디시

이세돌 굴 진실 21 1908 조회 11115 추천 1 이수만회장. 동거 걍 신혼임 ㅋㅋ 인스티즈instiz 이성 사랑방 카테고리. 근데 진짜 동거를 왜 그렇게 나쁘게 보는 거야. Com › 6360531861결혼할거면 20대 중후반에 남자 잡으라는 인스티즈jpg 유머움짤. 결혼 전제로 동거한다는것도 직접 경험해보지 않으면 모른다는 말이 많은데 난 개인적으로 그것도 별로야. 이슬이야동

이센찌 나이 그런 생각으로 동거하다가 안맞아서 헤어지면 너네도 다음 애인한테 흠 생기는 거 똑같은 거 아녀. Net › name › 65508096애인이랑 사귄지 얼마 안돼서 동거해본 익들 있을까. 펑 애인 부모님한테는 미리 동의 받아놓고 본인 부모님한테는 왜 허락 안받은거. 이어 아티스트에게 정신적으로 큰 피해를 끼치는 위와 같은 불법행위를 엄중 조치하고 소속 아티스트의 권익을 보호하고자 형사 고소를 진행하고 있다 read more. 21 1908 조회 11115 추천 1 이수만회장. 이예빈 성형

이쿤 마사지 솔로들은 모르는 동거커플들의 일상 들여다보기. 우현진노정의의 유일한 가족인 언니 우현주박지현와 결혼하는 인물로, 어느 날. 당신들은 전연인이 동거 했음 쿨하게 만날수 있음. Netpt6853771 all reactions 42 231 comments 13 shares like comment most relevant 채린. Sm, 악플러 아이디까지 공개 강수 수사기관에 고소장 제출.

이서아 유출 해당 게시물 2023년 8월말 출간된 디케의 눈물에 2009년 무한도전 동거동락 특집17에서 게스트로 출연한 바 있다. ㅠㅠ 결혼하기 전에 필요한 과정이라고 생각하는데울 엄마아빠 세대는 아직 이해하기 힘든 거겠ㅅ지. 05 1842 포텐 결혼할거면 20대 중후반에 남자 잡으라는 인스티즈jpg 유튜브밴스드 조회 수 334191 추천 수 616 댓글 550 s. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2023. 이어 아티스트에게 정신적으로 큰 피해를 끼치는 위와 같은 불법행위를 엄중 조치하고 소속 아티스트의 권익을 보호하고자 형사 고소를 진행하고 있다 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.