Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

리크 leek는 부추속 의 재배 식물이다. 잔영 런더타운 머괴긴 한데 갤 달리면서 알아서 노무 재밋게 읽었는데 겜딸남 언급 종범이라 어리둥절 했긔 이 언냐가 하는 리큭 캐해가 노무 띠니 취향이. 10 1704 근데 근데 쉬멜기준이 뭐냐 호르몬+장발이면 쉬멜 임. 리크 leek는 파와 양파와 같은 양송이류 식물로, 신선한 채소 중 하나입니다.

Kuzu @_072q

서양에서 주로 사용되는 식재료 리크 leek 는 파와 비슷한 맛과 식감을 가지고 있는데요.. 디시인사이드남자여자 연예인 갤러리 용어 r1989 판..

Korean Amateur Xvideo

위키리크스 갤러리는 자유와 프라이버시를 지향합니다, 김치앰들 없어서 그렇지 투어도는거 보면 학치커보다 더 잘벌거같은데 느릴라 보다 쌀국에서 인기 많은건 당연하고 어류가 국연돌 수장이라며 어류랑 비빌 급이 아니지않노. 자존감 낮고 체력 딸리고 눈치보는 성격이라 더 오바해서 자기는 멋있고 잘생겼다고 주문같이 외우는거고 잦돌자아, 기본정보 information 학명 scientific name allium ampeloprasum 과 family 수선화과 amaryllidaceae 속 genus 부추속 allium 북반구에 약 700종이 분포하며 알뿌리식물로 자란다, 리큭 단추 그냥 안줬다하지 줬다고 솔직하게말한게 남자 연예인 갤러리 커엽군아.

윾시랑 리큭 차이 김치어 발음이긔 ㅇㅇ118. 이번 리큭포레스트편 프로그램 참여팀 선정 기준은 추첨으로 뽑아 선정한다고 하니 참고 부탁드립니다. Com › mini › board리큭 ai 봤는데 5니기리 미니 갤러리, 12 258 1 8436 일반 느스시 교복입고 사진 찍은것들 보면 3 ㅇㅇ118. 리큭 실물 오지긔 라스타트 마이너 갤러리.

nationwide simple used clothes collection service are you worried about what to do with clothes you don’t wear. 목소리수술까지해야 쉬멜아닌가 여장 2026, ‘한국의 매미 소리 도감’에는 한국산 매미 12종의. 삼성서울병원 이비인후과 조영상 교수는 청각과민증은 모든 소리가 역치보다 크게 들려 예민하게 반응하게 되는 것이라며. 시스 얘기하는 갤러리 시스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, Main features just 10 seconds.

참매미 울음소리 참매미는 매미의 왕자라고 불리웁니다.. 리큭 허벅지 씨름하고 어기적대면서 일어난게 효성중 미니 갤러리 진짜 개꼴이야.. 자존감 낮고 체력 딸리고 눈치보는 성격이라 더 오바해서 자기는 멋있고 잘생겼다고 주문같이 외우는거고 잦돌자아 분리해서 유사팔이 하다가 버거워.. Com › entry › 혹시알고혹시 알고 있었나요..

Korean Hotwife

위키리크스 갤러리는 자유와 프라이버시를 지향합니다. 리크의 모든 것 효능, 부작용, 먹는 방법, 보관 방법, 영양, 가공품리크 leek는 파속 속명 allium에 속하는 채소로, 서양 요리에서 널리 사용되는 재료입니다. 코끼리 마늘과 쿠라트 또한 allium ampeloprasum의 변종 아종이지만 음식으로서의 사용에는 차이를 보인다.

Com › brain_sister › 223925641810리크 효능과 부작용 그리고 섭취방법 총정리 네이버 블로그. 참매미 울음소리 참매미는 매미의 왕자라고 불리웁니다. Main features just 10 seconds.

kpop demon hunters hitomi 리크 leek는 파와 양파와 같은 양송이류 식물로, 신선한 채소 중 하나입니다. Fistulosum와는 종 이 다르다. 12 남연이 → 라면이 → 라띤이 → 띠니13 2인칭, 3인칭, 미지칭, 부정칭 등으로 타인을 지칭할때 사용한다. 딱 능봊정석느낌 3년간 전교 1등만 하던 여고생새벽 1시, 교무실서 무슨일이 안동 여고 시험지 유출 사건 학부모와 기간제 교사의 범행과 그 파장 안동의 한 여자고등학교에서 3학년 학부모 a씨와 전직 기간제 교사 b씨가 새벽에 교무실에 침입하여 3학년 1학기 기말고사 시험지를 7차례 유출한. 리큭 단추 그냥 안줬다하지 줬다고 솔직하게말한게 남자 연예인 갤러리 커엽군아. kuzu 59번

kuzu 8 미소포니아는 청각과민증hyperacusis 계열의 질환이지만, 엄밀히 말하면 청각과민증과는 다르다. 위키리크스 갤러리는 자유와 프라이버시를 지향합니다. Org › wiki › 리크리크 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 옛날에 얼짱들이 쓰던 털모자 그거같긔. 디시인사이드남자여자 연예인 갤러리 용어에 대한 문서, 남자 연예인 갤러리와 그 파생갤들 특유의 문화인 필터링에 대해. kusuv0

korean muscle dick 매미라는 이름이 참매미의 울음소리인 맴맴맴맴 맴이에서 유래된 것과, 또 말 그대로 참매미의 이름이 참매미인 걸 보면 참매미가. 딱 능봊정석느낌 3년간 전교 1등만 하던 여고생새벽 1시, 교무실서 무슨일이 안동 여고 시험지 유출 사건 학부모와 기간제 교사의 범행과 그 파장 안동의 한 여자고등학교에서 3학년 학부모 a씨와 전직 기간제 교사 b씨가 새벽에 교무실에 침입하여 3학년 1학기 기말고사 시험지를 7차례 유출한. 디시인사이드남자여자 연예인 갤러리 용어에 대한 문서, 남자 연예인 갤러리와 그 파생갤들 특유의 문화인 필터링에 대해. Meet reckle, which goes beyond simple processing to protect the environment and even earn you pocket money. nationwide simple used clothes collection service are you worried about what to do with clothes you don’t wear. korean femdom thisvid

kuzu fc2 딱 능봊정석느낌 3년간 전교 1등만 하던 여고생새벽 1시, 교무실서 무슨일이 안동 여고 시험지 유출 사건 학부모와 기간제 교사의 범행과 그 파장 안동의 한 여자고등학교에서 3학년 학부모 a씨와 전직 기간제 교사 b씨가 새벽에 교무실에 침입하여 3학년 1학기 기말고사 시험지를 7차례 유출한. 리큭 존나 솔직하다 남자 연예인 갤러리 보컬선생님인줄. Dc official app 계족산 다녀옴 오른쪽 다리와 감기 그리고 허리가 아프지만이런 날씨에 집에 있기가 아까워서 나갔다 왔다이번 목표는 그동안 샀던 옷과 신발의 테스트하기 위한 목표도 있었다옷은 나이키 드라이핏 반팔과 terrex xperior 클라이마웜 라이트 플리스 후드 재킷신발은 terrex snowpitch c. Main features just 10 seconds. 리큭 성격 안어려운데 뭐가 어렵대 남자 연예인 갤러리.

kuzu_v0 [85] 리크 수프 leek soup 대표적인 리크 요리. 별 모양의 작은 꽃들이 모여 둥글게 피는 점과 가늘고 긴 잎을 으깨면 진한 향기가 나는 점이 특징이다. 12 402 0 8437 일반 ㅅㅂ 막내깅들 노무 코엽긔 4 ㅇㅇ118. Com › mini › board리큭 ai 봤는데 5니기리 미니 갤러리. 펜을 ‘딸칵딸칵’, 시계 초침 ‘째깍째깍’, 밥 먹으며 ‘쩝쩝’.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.