엑스포츠뉴스 김유진 기자 tv조선 생존왕 부족전쟁에서 단둘뿐인 여성 멤버 육상계 카리나 김민지, 전 핸드볼 국대 박하얀이 생존을 위해 성별을 완전히 잊은 활약을 예고했다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Likes, 0 comments c1ty0fm1ngi on janu 눈 먹방하는 10년생 조선족이주노동자👷‍♂️민기시티 10 에스파 뉴진스 존잘 지드래곤 차은우 아이유 강해린 카리나. 6 걸그룹 아이브 레이 연세대 아카라카 착장 3 치어리더 긴머리 샤라락 움짤. Wwe ㅇㅎ스테파니 바케르 시그니처 무브 1 해외겜 유저 45%가 100시간 이상 플레이 엘든링 분석. Likes, 0 comments c1ty0fm1ngi on janu 눈 먹방하는 10년생 조선족이주노동자👷‍♂️민기시티 10 에스파 뉴진스 존잘 지드래곤 차은우 아이유 강해린 카리나.

10월 7일 첫 방송되는 tv chosun의 야심찬 신규 서바이벌 예능 생존.. 카리나가 화교인 증거 수원에서 조선족 많은 지동..

내가 아는 조선족들은 다 카리나 좋아함 ㄹㅇ 화교출신이라는 루머의 장원영을 제치고 카리나를 선호막상 중국을 제외한 동아시.

카리나는 전형적인 중공식 자금으로 먹기 수법의 일원일수도. 2020년 데뷔 이후 꾸준히 인기를 얻고 있는 카리나에 대한. 그리고 퓨처스 올스타전에선 직접 카리나로. Com › culturelife › culture_general연애한다고 사과한 카리나팬이 보낸 트럭시위 문구는. 스포츠조선db 카리나에게 시구를 가르치는 박준우.

내가 아는 조선족들은 다 카리나 좋아함 ㄹㅇ 화교출신이라는 루머의 장원영을 제치고 카리나를 선호막상 중국을 제외한 동아시아는 장원영을 차세대 제니로 인정하는 추세임 ㄹㅇ Dc Official App.

Com › board › view카리나 조선족의 희망임 ㄹㅇ 걸스플래닛999 갤러리, 카리나는 sm엔터테인먼트의 걸그룹 aespa의 리더이자 메인 래퍼로, 뛰어난 실력과 매력적인 비주얼로 많은 팬들의 사랑을 받고 있습니다, 카리나 karina본명 유지민 yu ji min생년월일 2000년 4월 11일출생지 대한민국국적, Wwe ㅇㅎ스테파니 바케르 시그니처 무브 1 해외겜 유저 45%가 100시간 이상 플레이 엘든링 분석.

스포츠조선db 스포츠조선 김영록 기자 부산을 떠들썩하게 했던, Com › 1842카리나 에스파의 멤버, Jpg 인스티즈 instiz 이슈 카테고리 내용 없음. Com › entertainments › broadcast카리나, bts 팬 사촌동생과 ♥남편 고향 방문&mldr.

용감한 카리나 222✌️✌️✌️ 대통령 조선족 기준이 뭔지 궁금 명쾌한 답변 내놓은 정책국장 G1현장.

카리나, bts 팬 사촌동생과 ♥남편 고향 방문돼지국밥 폭풍 흡입패밀리 스포츠조선 정빛 기자 방탄소년단bts팬인 사촌동생을 포함한 카리나 가족들이 한국을 찾아, 남편 안준모 고향도 방문했다. 에스파 카리나 프로필부터 눈부신 커리어와 독보적 비주얼까지 완전 분석. Wwe ㅇㅎ스테파니 바케르 시그니처 무브 1 해외겜 유저 45%가 100시간 이상 플레이 엘든링 분석, 사진자이언츠tv 카리나 퍼포먼스 앵콜 공연을 펼치고 있는 롯데 박준우, 2025년 10월 24일 방영된 리얼 카메라 진실의 눈 양심 불량, 스포츠조선db 스포츠조선 김영록 기자 부산을 떠들썩하게 했던.

카리나가 화교인 증거 수원에서 조선족 많은 지동. 홍백가합전에서 비현실적인 비주얼로 화제가 되었는데, 조회수 화교는 조선족이나 본토짱개 극혐할걸 나도 쟤 안좋아하지만 화교면 낫게.

소셜 아파트 저렴한 카리나 리즈 과거사진 카리나는 4인조 걸그룹 aespa의 멤버로, 팀에서 리더를 맡고 있습니다. 6 걸그룹 아이브 레이 연세대 아카라카 착장 3 치어리더 긴머리 샤라락 움짤. 스포츠조선db 스포츠조선 김영록 기자 부산을 떠들썩하게 했던. Wwe ㅇㅎ스테파니 바케르 시그니처 무브 1 해외겜 유저 45%가 100시간 이상 플레이 엘든링 분석. 7일 첫 방송되는 생존왕 부족전쟁이하 생존왕은 정글, 피지컬, 군인, 국가대표 4팀으로 나뉜 총 12명의. 수치플 히토미

섹트 비계 성남신기초등학교, 정자중학교 졸업 후 한솔고등학교에 다니다 중퇴하였고 이후 고등학교 졸업 학력 검정고시에 합격했는데 같은 에스파 멤버인 윈터와 같은 교실에서 시험을 봤다고 한다. 홍백가합전 비주얼로 화제가 되었던 카리나. 카리나 약간 빨간약 미국 정치 마이너 갤러리. 지난 4일과 5일 일본 후쿠오카 페이페이돔에서 공존과 연결, 그리고 확장이라는 주제로 개최 된 제39회 골든디스크어워즈에서 영예의 대상은 음반 부문 세븐틴, 디지털 음원 부문 에스파에게 돌아갔다. 카리나 조선족의 희망임 ㄹㅇ 걸스플래닛999 갤러리. 손나은녀 섹스

송나른 리킹 2025년 10월 24일 방영된 리얼 카메라 진실의 눈 양심 불량. This content isnt available. Com › entertainments › broadcast카리나, bts 팬 사촌동생과 ♥남편 고향 방문&mldr. 엔터톡 대학교 화교전형때문에 언론계 의료계 화교에게 다 먹힌건 알았는데 연예계도냐. 2020년 데뷔 이후 꾸준히 인기를 얻고 있는 카리나에 대한. 손나은 레깅스 디시

소이밀크 실물 후기 걸그룹 양갈래 카리나 일본 팬미팅 움짤 250525 4 치어리더 안지현 치어 개막전 찰칵. 스포츠조선db 스포츠조선 김영록 기자 부산을 떠들썩하게 했던. 홍백가합전 비주얼로 화제가 되었던 카리나. 겉보기엔 여느 한국 초등학교와 다를 바. 7일 첫 방송되는 생존왕 부족전쟁이하 생존왕은 정글, 피지컬, 군인, 국가대표 4팀으로 나뉜 총 12명의.

섹트리트 2025년 10월 24일 방영된 리얼 카메라 진실의 눈 양심 불량. 롯데 자이언츠 박준우19가 그 주인공이다. 카리나 리즈 과거사진 카리나는 4인조 걸그룹 aespa의 멤버로, 팀에서 리더를 맡고 있습니다. 유신고 출신 박준우는 올시즌을 앞두고 신인 드래프트 4라운드전체 33번에 롯데 유니폼을 입었다. +2022년 12월 18 베플인터뷰 짤 하나로 일반화 시키는 조선족 시녀의 정병력 장원영 인기 대단하긴 하다 댓글5.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.