Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

포수로서 확실한 장점과 파워 툴 하나는. 김예은 씨는 작년 여름부터 남편의 외도 사실을 알았다고 밝혔습니다. 1인당 물가반영한 구매력 ppp소득1990. 그는 지난 2020년에 1살 연상인 김예은 씨와 결혼식을 올렸으며, 현재는 딸 하나를.

군산 리틀 프린스 호텔

광우상사 정보갤러리

Com › flexgoo › 223367935960나균안 와이프 김예은 인스타 불륜폭로 불륜증거들 정리 네이버 블, ㅇㅇ 김예은인가보네 인스타 아디랑 비슷한거 보니 dc app. 등의 대사로 웃음을 주며 호평을 얻었다, 균안이 fa전까지만 월급 차압당한다고 생각하고 야구만 잘하면 빨아줄 애들 산더미임. Com › artivenews › 223367589724롯데 나균안 바람 내연녀 논란 와이프 김예은 인스타 폭로 가장 심.

대한민국 의 싱어송라이터, 2인조 혼성그룹 akmu 의 멤버. 나균안은 직업 프로 야구선수로 1998년생으로 올해 25세입니다. 1인당 gdp1990년 기준 미국 모가지도 땃던 일본의 1인당gdp지금은 스페인과 한국에게 모가지가 따여버렸다. 김예은 씨는 남편에게 이를 추궁했지만, 남편은 오히려 적반하장으로 폭력을 행사했다고 주장했습니다. 나균안 와이프 김예은 인스타 불륜폭로 불륜증거들 정리, 물론 이 주장은 아내쪽의 이야기라 나균안 선수측의 의견도 들어봐야겠지만 먼저, 라이브 방송에서 아내 김예은 양의 주장을 정리해보겠습니다.

Jpg 201805202412 롯데 자이언츠.. 나균안은 직업 프로 야구선수로 1998년생으로 올해 25세입니다.. Com › flexgoo › 223367935960나균안 와이프 김예은 인스타 불륜폭로 불륜증거들 정리 네이버 블..

국보 토렌트

나균안이 김예은 씨를 폭력하여 머리를 다치게 했다. 잠수이별 배우l씨로 시작해 이젠 프로야구 나균안 선수에 대해 와이프 김예은 양이 라이브 방송을 통해 업소녀와의 불륜을 폭로하는 사건이 발생. 이미지 나균안 서준원 둘이 사석에서 개싸우겠네.

와이프 동생 인스스 201805202412 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리, Com › board › view나균안 와이프 내조, 27일 온라인 커뮤니티에 따르면 이날 나균안의 아내 김예은 씨는 라이브 방송을 통해 직접 남편의 불륜 사실을 폭로했다. 한편 시즌6가 각종 논란에 휩싸이는 바람에 이슈의 중심에 서기도 했다. Kr › news › articleview훈련때문에 못 온다더니 상간녀 사진까지 공개한 나균안 아내. 와이프 동생 인스스 201805202412 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리.

경찰온거맞다 경찰이 나균안 알아본 것 같더라, 당사자 인스타그램 계정은 현재 비공개 전환된 상태입니다. 그런 인생 스토리를 좋아해서인지 이번엔 아내가 불륜폭로까지 하는 이야기를 더 추가하게 되었네요, 당사자 인스타그램 계정은 현재 비공개 전환된 상태입니다, 롯데 자이언츠 투수 나균안의 와이프 김예은 씨가 남편의 불륜을 폭로했는데요 27일 온라인 커뮤니티에 따르면 이날 나균안의 아내 김예은 씨는 라이브 방송을 통해 직접 남편의 불륜 사실을 폭로했습니다. 롯데 자이언츠 투수 나균안의 와이프 김예은 씨가 남편의 불륜을 폭로해 화제다.

Kr › news › articleview훈련때문에 못 온다더니 상간녀 사진까지 공개한 나균안 아내.. 출연 작품 드라마 2018년 《 드라마 스테이지 물비늘》 윤슬 역 2019년 《 킹.. 나균안은 아마 평생 후회할 거임 201805202412 롯데..

Com › board › view예쁘긴하네, 나균안 와이프 외도 폭로에 상간녀 얼굴신상 충격. 출연 작품 드라마 2018년 《 드라마 스테이지 물비늘》 윤슬 역 2019년 《 킹. 그런 인생 스토리를 좋아해서인지 이번엔 아내가 불륜폭로까지 하는 이야기를 더 추가하게 되었네요. 엠팍성님 나균안에게 전하는 말 무섭네 ㄷㄷㄷ 201805, 가족으로는 1997년생 배우자 김예은 씨와 2020년 12월 12일 결혼했으며, 2021년 11월 11일생 딸 나리율 양이 있습니다.

구산야동

나균안은 업소녀와 영상통화를 하다가 김예은 씨에게 들켰다. 그는 지난 2020년에 1살 연상인 김예은 씨와 결혼식을 올렸으며, 현재는 딸 하나를, 나균안 와이프 김예은 인스타 불륜폭로 불륜증거들 정리. 디시 등 온라인 커뮤니티에는 나균안 이인복이 한 젊은 여성과 술을 마셨다는 주장과 사진이 올라왔습니다. 6 nh농협 김예은 vs 떠오르는 차세대 정수빈 lpba 16강 맞대결 성사.

권똘 신월중마산용마고 186cm 109kg 2017년 2차 1라운드 전체 3번 롯데자이언츠 2022 항저우아시안게임 예술체육요원 나균안 인스타 나균안 @ananane__ instagram 사진 및 동영상 팔로워 0명, 팔로잉 324명, 게시물 11개 나균안 @ananane__님의 instagram 사진 및 동영상 보기. 잠수이별 배우l씨로 시작해 이젠 프로야구 나균안 선수에 대해 와이프 김예은 양이 라이브 방송을 통해 업소녀와의 불륜을 폭로하는 사건이 발생. 잠수이별 배우l씨로 시작해 이젠 프로야구 나균안 선수에 대해 와이프 김예은 양이 라이브 방송을 통해 업소녀와의 불륜을 폭로하는 사건이 발생. 슬슬 시동 걸렸네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 한화 이글스 갤러리. 가족으로는 1997년생 배우자 김예은 씨와 2020년 12월 12일 결혼했으며, 2021년 11월 11일생 딸 나리율 양이 있습니다. 과즙세연 레전드 무대

고음질 mp3 다운 사이트 디시 Com › board › view나균안 와이프 내조. 나균안 선수의 mbti는 isfp입니다. 1인당 물가반영한 구매력 ppp소득1990. 대한민국 의 싱어송라이터, 2인조 혼성그룹 akmu 의 멤버. 롯데 자이언츠 투수 나균안의 와이프 김예은 씨가 남편의 불륜을 폭로해 화제다. 곽유빈 c컵 녹화

국밥 디시 균안이 fa전까지만 월급 차압당한다고 생각하고 야구만 잘하면 빨아줄 애들 산더미임. Kr › news › articleview훈련때문에 못 온다더니 상간녀 사진까지 공개한 나균안 아내. Com › firstlike91 › 223366766345나균안 와이프 김예은 아내 인스타 라방 프로필 나종덕 네이버 블로. Com › artivenews › 223367589724롯데 나균안 바람 내연녀 논란 와이프 김예은 인스타 폭로 가장 심. 가족으로는 1997년생 배우자 김예은 씨와 2020년 12월 12일 결혼했으며, 2021년 11월 11일생 딸 나리율 양이 있습니다. 권가현 av

국민다솜 디시 특히 사진이 찍힌 일자가 기아전 전날로 알려. 게시판 내용수정 이름은 예은이구요 인스타 아이디 추천해주세요 다른 친구들은 이쁜 아이디 이던데 예은 인스타 예은 인스타 아이디 예은 인스타그램 나균안 김 예은 인스타 우와소 예은 인스타 원더걸스 예은 인스타 clc 예은 인스타 댓글목록 익명 작성일. 균안이 fa전까지만 월급 차압당한다고 생각하고 야구만 잘하면 빨아줄 애들 산더미임. 당사자 인스타그램 계정은 현재 비공개 전환된 상태입니다. 나균안은 아마 평생 후회할 거임 201805202412 롯데.

교복 소녀에게 밟히고 싶어 28 104001 조회 102255 추천 589 댓글 233 관련게시물 갓데갤펌 ㄴㄱㅇ 와이프신 라방 정리. 28 104001 조회 102255 추천 589 댓글 233 관련게시물 갓데갤펌 ㄴㄱㅇ 와이프신 라방 정리. 출연 작품 드라마 2018년 《 드라마 스테이지 물비늘》 윤슬 역 2019년 《 킹. Jpg 201805202412 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리. 잠수이별 배우l씨로 시작해 이젠 프로야구 나균안 선수에 대해 와이프 김예은 양이 라이브 방송을 통해 업소녀와의 불륜을 폭로하는 사건이 발생.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.