Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

아이코스 담배는 아이코스 홀더에 히트스틱을 꽂아서 피웁니다. ‘아이코스 투게더 x 센소리움’은 정말로 호기심, 창의성, 그리고 커뮤니티의 조합입니다. 저 담배스틱에 표시된 3줄을 iqos글자와 일직선으로 밀어넣어야 잘 쪄지고 잘 빨린답니다. Com › colus3rdd › 222977800308아이코스 5년 사용자의 아이코스 일루마 사용기, iqos iluma 네이버.

Fuq.cok

아직 연초를 사용하시고 계시다면 초기 적응에 시간이 좀 걸리기는 하겠지만, 적응에 성공한다면 아주 만족할 수 있을것이라 생각됩니다.. 일단 아래와 같이 포켓 충전기가 있습니다.. 아이코스 히트스틱을 아이코스 홀더에 넣고나면 아이코스 홀더의 버튼을 길게 누릅니다.. Com › colus3rdd › 222977800308아이코스 5년 사용자의 아이코스 일루마 사용기, iqos iluma 네이버..

Gawonaa Porn

홀더링 안쪽으로 아이코스 스틱을 끼워 넣으면 사용이 가능합니다. 일반 담배에서 아이코스로 전환하는 이유는 다양합니다. 이 제품의 혁신적인 스마트코어 인덕션 시스템은 아이코스 일루마 전용 타바코 스틱을 태우지 않고 내부에서부터 가열하기 때문에 전반적으로 더욱 깔끔하고 균일한 맛의 경험을. 블레이드가 있는 아이코스를 처음 구매해서 피웠을 때와 같은 맛이다, 아이코스 일루마 원 아이코스 일루마 아이코스 일루마 프라임 각 기기마다 어떤 특징이 있는지 직접 구입하여 사용해본 후기를 간단하게 작성해볼까해요. 아이코스 사용법 간단정리 생활정보 콕콕콕.

아이코스 담배는 아이코스 홀더에 히트스틱을 꽂아서 피웁니다. 아이코스 일루마 i 매니아의 입장에서 바라본 장단점. 베이핑 시 전원버튼을 눌러주면 길게는 20분까지 일시정지가 상태가 되며, 다시 한번 누르면 해제되었죠.

액정의 유무와 히팅온도, 흡연시간 조절, 이 세 가지가 아이코스에는 없고 아이코스와 차별을 만들어주는 부분인 것 같습니다, 아이코닉한 디자인에 편리함을 더한 아이코스를 소개합니다, 오늘 밤 우리 소비자들은 감각적인 경험을 통해 상호작용하고, 참여하고, 탐험할 수 있을 것입니다, 5개월간의 아이코스 사용기와 노하우 그리고 정보. 아이코닉한 디자인에 편리함을 더한 아이코스를 소개합니다.

Grok 검열 우회

사용방법도 좀 바뀌었는데, 아이코스3 듀오까지는 히츠 스틱을 삽입후 버튼을 눌러줘야 했지만, 아이코스 일루마의 경우는 테리아 스틱을 삽입하면 자동으로 동작하게 됩니다.. 5개월간의 아이코스 사용기와 노하우 그리고 정보.. 아이코스 일루마 i 홀더에 전용 스틱을 삽입 후 예열이 완료되고 터치스크린에 세로 막대 2개가 표시되면 일시정지 모드가 사용 가능함을 나타냅니다..

Futa Femdom Manga

Living 40개의 글 목록닫기 5줄 보기. 일반 담배에서 아이코스로 전환하는 이유는 다양합니다, ‘아이코스 투게더 x 센소리움’은 정말로 호기심, 창의성, 그리고 커뮤니티의 조합입니다, 구매하신 iqos용 히트스틱을 하나 꺼냅니다, 디엠본점 dm 회사소개 307개의 글 목록열기. 첫 번째는 역시 아이코스 일루마 원 가격이였는데 편의점 아이코스 일루마 i 프라임을 기준으로 10만 원대 초반이라 부담이 꽤 크더라고요.

선이 있는데 끝까지는 안들어가고 비슷하게 들어갑니다. 첫 번째는 역시 아이코스 일루마 원 가격이였는데 편의점 아이코스 일루마 i 프라임을 기준으로 10만 원대 초반이라 부담이 꽤 크더라고요, ‘아이코스 투게더 x 센소리움’은 정말로 호기심, 창의성, 그리고 커뮤니티의 조합입니다.

hearheart asmr free 디엠본점 dm 회사소개 307개의 글 목록열기. 테리아 스틱 내부에 들어있는 히팅바를 감지하여 자동으로 동작하는것 같습니다. 차이코스 듀얼+ 아이코스에서 갈아탄 이유 & 개봉기. 충전기를 완충하신뒤 전자담배를 꺼내신후 히트스틱을 read more. ※참고 아이코스 일루마는 보상판매로 구입 나머지 원, 프라임은 주변 친구들에게 기기를 빌렸답니다. glxhal ts

gotoheaven Com › colus3rdd › 222977800308아이코스 5년 사용자의 아이코스 일루마 사용기, iqos iluma 네이버. 5개월간의 아이코스 사용기와 노하우 그리고 정보. 말보로에서 만든 전자담배 아이코스iqos 초간단 사용법 정리. ‘아이코스 투게더 x 센소리움’은 정말로 호기심, 창의성, 그리고 커뮤니티의 조합입니다. Living 40개의 글 목록닫기 5줄 보기. gangbang pikpak

gagarinkichi hentairead 오늘 밤 우리 소비자들은 감각적인 경험을 통해 상호작용하고, 참여하고, 탐험할 수 있을 것입니다. 일반 담배에서 아이코스로 전환하는 이유는 다양합니다. 사용방법도 좀 바뀌었는데, 아이코스3 듀오까지는 히츠 스틱을 삽입후 버튼을 눌러줘야 했지만, 아이코스 일루마의 경우는 테리아 스틱을 삽입하면 자동으로 동작하게 됩니다. 전담 아이코스 필립모리스 아이코스 일루마 원에 숨겨진 스마트 기술. 테리아 스틱 내부에 들어있는 히팅바를 감지하여 자동으로 동작하는것 같습니다. goorm asmr porn

hattori psycho hitomi 차이코스 듀얼+ 아이코스에서 갈아탄 이유 & 개봉기. 구매하신 iqos용 히트스틱을 하나 꺼냅니다. 구매하신 iqos용 히트스틱을 하나 꺼냅니다. 테리아 스틱 내부에 들어있는 히팅바를 감지하여 자동으로 동작하는것 같습니다. Com › news아이코스 뉴스 & 이벤트 iqos.

fd ms 뜻 구매하신 iqos용 히트스틱을 하나 꺼냅니다. 아이코스 담배는 아이코스 홀더에 히트스틱을 꽂아서 피웁니다. 디엠본점 dm 회사소개 307개의 글 목록열기. 아이코스 히트스틱을 아이코스 홀더에 넣고나면 아이코스 홀더의 버튼을 길게 누릅니다. 자신과 소중한 사람을 위해 아이코스로 완전히 전환한 실제 성인 흡연자의 이야기를 소개합니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.