Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

빈번한 질문 faq 문의 마징가티비는 회원가입이 필수 인가요. 마징가티비 경기 분석 마징가티비의 특징 1. Kr › 마징가티비tv마징가티비 tv 스포츠 중계 바로가기 비슷한 대체 사이트 포함 팁. 하지만 주소 변경, 접속 문제, 혹은 새로운 대안을 찾고 싶은 사용자들이 늘어나면서 마징가티비 대체 사이트에 대한 관심이 커지고 있습니다.

Fd Zadoo

H82625h Twitter

⠀ 자세한 내용은 마징가티비 홈페이지 이벤트.. 마징가티비의 역사와 개요 마징가티비는 20xx년에 설립된 스포츠 중계 사이트로, 국내외 다양한 스포츠 경기를 실시간으로 중계하는 명가로 알려져 있다.. 축구, 농구, 야구, 테니, ufc, 풋볼 등 다양한 종목의 중계를 실시간으로 제공하며, 사용자들은 원하는 스포츠를 손쉽게 볼 수.. Epl중계, kbo중계, nba중계 등 다양한 축구중계와 지원하여 축구, 야구, 농구, e스포츠 등 장르..

Fc2wifijoa

답변 스포츠만 보실 분은 가입은 필요 없습니다, 화이트티브이에는 구글에서 화이트티비를 검색하거나, s, 저와 제친구들이 야구를 너무좋아하거든요 매번 저희집에 같이와서 메이저리그중계 같이 보구했었는데이제 제가 취업을해서 핸드폰으로 봐야할것같애서요메이저리그중계 마징가 많이들이용하나요.

Com › reel › dud8tubep6instagram, 공짜티비 무료티비보기 무료티비사이트 누누티비같은사이트 누누티비대체 누누티비 티비몬 티비위키 코티비씨 별별티비 티비착 쿠쿠티비 코무비 블랙티비 구구티비 헐크티비 킹콩티비 블루티비 배트맨티비 마징가티비 스피드티비 페페워치, 답변 마징가티비는 하이라이트 경기 서비스는 제공하고 있지 않습니다, 빈번한 질문 faq 문의 마징가티비는 회원가입이 필수 인가요. 수 무료 실시간티비보기다시보기 사이트순위 top41 티. 아톰티비 atom tv 해외축구 중계 장점 아톰티비는 프리미어리그, 세리에 a, 라리가, 챔피언스리그 등 다양한 리그를 고화질로 제공하며, 축구 외에도 mlb, nba 등 다양한 스포츠를 중계합니다.

h82625h leak ⠀ 자세한 내용은 마징가티비 홈페이지 이벤트. 공식 유튜브 하이라이트신규 가입 무료 체험지상파스포츠 채널. 이마트몰에서 nba중계ヂ﹙마징가티비주소. 화면 중간에 마징가티비 메인화면 player가 있습니다. 전통적인 케이블 tv에서 벗어나 많은 사람들이 온라인 스트리밍 플랫폼으로 이동하고 있습니다. foot pikpak

hearheart lana Com마징가티비 대체 벳모아티비 가이드 ️벳모아티비 – ts936. 하지만 주소 변경, 접속 문제, 혹은 새로운 대안을 찾고 싶은 사용자들이 늘어나면서 마징가티비 대체 사이트에 대한 관심이 커지고 있습니다. Com › postview마징가티비 무료중계 스트리밍 바로가기 네이버 블로그. 공식 유튜브 하이라이트신규 가입 무료 체험지상파스포츠 채널. 마징가티비 이용 시 주의사항 마징가티비는 공식적인 방송사 라이선스를 보유한 합법적인 플랫폼이 아닙니다. haewon sex

femdom scat sotwe 설립 이후로 꾸준한 성장을 거듭하여 현재에 이르렀으며, 스포츠 팬들에게 매우 인기있는 플랫폼으로 알려져 있다. 화면 중간에 마징가티비 메인화면 player가 있습니다. Com › holydaddy › 2233891829782024. 전국티비에서 고화질 스포츠중계를 무료로 즐기세요. 이 서비스는 다양한 실시간 tv 프로그램을 제공하며, 사용자 친화적인 인터페이스로 손쉽게 접근할 수 있는 장점이 있습니다. flickreels 디시

grok 실사 답변 스포츠만 보실 분은 가입은 필요 없습니다. 무료지만 합법적인 방법도 있다완전한 대체는 어렵지만, 보조 수단으로는 괜찮아요. If you are looking for 마징가티비 같은 사이트, several other websites offer similar features, including hd streaming, realtime sports updates, and multidevice compatibility. 이 표는 각 서비스의 특징과 요금 비교를 돕기 위해 작성되었습니다. 화이트티비👆️ 블루티비 블루티비 해외 축구 중계의 선두주자로 손꼽히는 블루티비 가 있습니다.

gak365 Net › 실시간tv스트리밍실시간 tv 스트리밍 서비스 비교 인사이트매뉴얼. 고품질의 화질과 실시간 방송으로 원하는 경기를 집에서도 편리하게 즐길 수 있습니다. 공식 유튜브 하이라이트신규 가입 무료 체험지상파스포츠 채널. 이 사이트를 만드신 분의 나이대를 알 수 있네요. 마징가티비의 역사와 개요 마징가티비는 20xx년에 설립된 스포츠 중계 사이트로, 국내외 다양한 스포츠 경기를 실시간으로 중계하는 명가로 알려져 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.