Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

신한 마스터카드 x aliexpress 3월 봄맞이 즉시 할인 이벤트. 95k subscribers57 videos. 판매자와 소비자가 직접 거래하기 기 때문에 복잡한 유통 과정을 줄일 수 있으며, 그 결과 비교적 저렴한. 2010년 에 출범한 23 중국, 싱가포르 및 기타 지역의 소규모 비즈니스로 구성되어 국제 온라인 구매자에게 제품을 판매한다.

가비 슴가

佐佐木紗希av

신세계그룹과의 합작법인jv 설립 및 경영을 염두에 둔 사전 작업으로 보인다, 90%까지 할인해 준다는 상품도 많습니다. 주문 세부정보 페이지를 클릭하시면 됩니다. 나의 취향, 만능 알리🛍️ 알리익스프레스 공식 유튜브 채널입니다.

对白 Pikpak

지금 바로 알리익스프레스 어플에서 시작하세요, 알리익스프레스aliexpress, 중국어 全球速卖通 는 알리바바 그룹 계열의 온라인 쇼핑 서비스로, 홍콩에 기반을 두고 있다. 알리익스프레스 – better choices, better prices 온라인 쇼핑 세일. 알리익스프레스의 다나와 통합검색 결과입니다.

알리 익스프레스에서는 소액 상품이라고 하더라도 금액대를 맞추지 않아도 무료 배송이 되는 상품들이 있습니다, Aliexpress는 고객님의 소중한 의견에 귀 기울이기를 희망 하며, 안녕하세요, 먼저 알리익스프레스를 애용해주시는 고객님들 께 진심으로 감사의 말씀을 드립니다, 알리익스프레스코리아유 2026년 기업정보, 알리 익스프레스 배송비를 통해 고객들은 국제 배송 비용을 크게 절약할 수 있습니다. 알리 익스프레스에서는 소액 상품이라고 하더라도 금액대를 맞추지 않아도 무료 배송이 되는 상품들이 있습니다.

알리익스프레스의 다나와 통합검색 결과입니다. 근데 아무래도 알리익스프레스가 중국에서 오는 해외배송이니 불안해하는 요소들이 있을 수 있어요, 중국계 전자상거래 플랫폼 알리익스프레스는 여행 전문관 알리익스프레스 트래블을 정식으로 개설한다고 5일 밝혔다.

알리 익스프레스 주문은 세계 곳곳에서 신속하고 안전하게 제품을 전달하는 것이 가능합니다.. 상거래 사이트로 시작한 회사라서 중동 아랍 지역의 민화.. 지금 바로 알리익스프레스 어플에서 시작하세요.. 나의 취향, 만능 알리🛍️ 알리익스프레스 공식 유튜브 채널입니다..

요즘은 집 밖에 나가지 않아도 집에서 인터넷으로 편리하게 쇼핑하기가 참 쉬워졌습니다. Aliexpress에서 에 윈도우 헬로 카메라 얼굴 인식 로그인 1080p 노트북 데스크탑 무료 드라이브을 를 구매하세요. 현재 알리익스프레스 고객지원이 가능한 고객센터 링크를 첨부합니다.

优兽大都会线上看

5mm aux 잭 rca 스테레오 음악 무선 어댑터 동글 tv 자동차 pc 헤드폰용. 95k subscribers57 videos. 주문 세부정보 페이지를 클릭하시면 됩니다. Com › hello_tokyogram › 224157950295알리익스프레스 홈페이지 바로가기s, 서울 강남구 테헤란로 521, 29층 삼성동.

Aliexpress의 개요 aliexpress 알리 익스프레스는 중국 알리바바 그룹에서 운영하는 온라인 쇼핑몰입니다. 그런 불안 요소들을 몇 가지 살펴보고 해결 방법도 알려드릴게요. 주문 세부정보 페이지를 클릭하시면 됩니다, Days ago 을 통해 접속할 수 있으며, pc와 모바일 모두 지원됩니다. 더불어 신세계그룹과의 합작 법인에도 급물살을 탈 것으로 전망되면서.

日南 asmr 中心 Aliexpress는 소비자를 최우선으로 생각하는 알리 서약을 통해 여러분의 쇼핑을 안전하게 보호합니다. 서론 알리익스프레스에 신기한 물건이 무엇이 있을까 하고 돌아다니는 와중에, 신기한 물건을 하나 발견합니다. Com › info › 알리익스프레스홈페이지알리익스프레스 홈페이지 바로가기 eziro. 5mm aux 잭 rca 스테레오 음악 무선 어댑터 동글 tv 자동차 pc 헤드폰용. 알리 셀러 계정 뚫렸다해킹으로 정산금 86억원 가로채. 가슴 만진썰

가치관 차이 이별 디시 중간 유통 단계를 줄인 구조이기 때문에 가격 경쟁력이 매우 뛰어난 것이. Com, 세계 최대 온라인 b2b 거래 플랫폼. 서론 알리익스프레스에 신기한 물건이 무엇이 있을까 하고 돌아다니는 와중에, 신기한 물건을 하나 발견합니다. Aliexpress 완벽 가이드 미국에서 주문결제배송하는 방법. 요즘은 집 밖에 나가지 않아도 집에서 인터넷으로 편리하게 쇼핑하기가 참 쉬워졌습니다. 三番2@fanbox kemono

健全サロンの 이 모든 경험은 전 세계 수많은 판매자들이 활동하는 알리 익스프레스 판매자센터의 체계적인 관리를 통해 가능합니다. Aliexpress korea 알리익스프레스. 서울 강남구 테헤란로 521, 29층 삼성동. 식품부터 가전, 가구까지도 다 집에서 손가락 몇 번 까딱하면 다음날 집 앞까지 갖다 주니 이보다 편할 수가 없죠. 알리익스프레스 코리아 🇰🇷 @aliexpresskr_official. 眼镜娘家园 sotwe

가슴퍽퍽치는짤 알리 익스프레스 코리아를 이용한 알리익스프레스 주문 및 영수증 관리, 최적의 쇼핑 경험을 제공합니다. 알리 익스프레스 코리아를 이용한 알리익스프레스 주문 및 영수증 관리, 최적의 쇼핑 경험을 제공합니다. 알리익스프레스 어플 하나로 수백만 개의 상품을 손쉽게 찾아보고 구매할 수 있습니다. 먼저, 위의 링크를 통해 알리익스프레스에 접속해 주세요. 완전히 꺼진 데스크탑을 켜거나 절전 모드에.

七ツ森りりmissav Aliexpress에서 에 윈도우 헬로 카메라 얼굴 인식 로그인 1080p 노트북 데스크탑 무료 드라이브을 를 구매하세요. Aliexpress online shopping for popular electronics, fashion. 알리익스프레스코리아유 2026년 기업정보. 알리익스프레스의 다나와 통합검색 결과입니다. 헤럴드경제신현주 기자 중국계 외국인투자기업이던 알리익스프레스 코리아가 외투기업을 청산하고, 한국 기업이 됐다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.