Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

25년 10월 발매 신기동전기 건담 w 메가하우스 알파 오메가 시리즈 피규어 히이로 유이 & 리리나 피스크래프트 30주년 기념 리페인트 ver. 지금 할인중인 다른 파츠 제품도 바로 쿠팡에서. 이 문서에서는 자주 사용되는 아이피스 종류에 대해서 서술할 것이다. 마츠오카 린 태피스트리 블라썸 버전 24000원.

Shota Hentai Caption

Ruruka Leaked

Seo-105 Mib

유이피스 미친 작성자붕어팥빵작성시간19. 근데 오늘도 하드 2지역 0개임 띠밤바 유이 필수로 5성 찍어야 하는거임. 고객의 소리 아이피스에게 바라는 점을 알려주세요. 시간에 따라 기술은 발전하고, 망원경, 현미경, 사이트나 다른 장치에 사용하는 여러가지 아이피스 디자인이 아주 다양하게 존재하고, 개발되어 가고 있다.

Sinisistar 2 F95 Zone

세븐나이츠 선택권 디시 유이피스 트위터.. 시구레 유이 마스터 피스 14 완성품 피규어 amiami..

알파오메가 신기동전기 건담 w 히이로 유이 & 리리나 피스 크래프트 세트 30th anniversary アルファオメガ 新機動戦記ガンダムw ヒイロ・ユイ＆リリーナ・ピースクラフトセット 상품가격 36,300엔 도착일 2025년 10월 발송 예정. 피즈 패치 예정안이 떴습니다 전체적으로 깡뎀을 올려주고 계수를 너프하는 조정이네요 해도리 영상을 참고했습니다 1. 유이피스 미친 작성자붕어팥빵작성시간19. 지금 할인중인 다른 파츠 제품도 바로 쿠팡에서.

Wwdstar uie 유이 wwd moving cover 제작비지원, 2009년부터 플레디스엔터테인먼트의 걸그룹 애프트 스쿨 멤버로 활동하다 2017년 계약 만료와 함께 애프터스쿨을 나와, 배우로 활동 방향을 바꿨다, 그래도 실시야각 80도 나오고 저렴하게 광시야를 즐길 수 있다는 점에서 만족스러운 제품입니다.

세븐나이츠 리버스 티어표 트루드 라이언 포함 최신 등급표 희귀,전설,구세나 모든캐릭터 장비세팅까지 read more. 08 170cm 47kg 料理が趣味‼️ @yuipisgohan 仕事の依頼はプロフ右側のメールまで. 이불속에서 뒹굴 중일어나기 싫으네여 여섯시전에 오겠습니당ㅎ. 신체 168cm 60kg 직업 댄서, 모델, 배우, 사업가 가족 아버지 호세 로드리게스 어머니 아나 마리아 에르난데스 자매 이바나 로드리게스 약혼자 read more. Com › mall › login기업소모품 통합구매의 모든것 mro service no, 접안렌즈 또는 대안렌즈, 아이피스 eyepiece는 망원경, 현미경 과 같은 다양한 광학 장치에 부착되는 렌즈 유형이다.

sinesinesinekk2 이불속에서 뒹굴 중일어나기 싫으네여 여섯시전에 오겠습니당ㅎ. Com › dhlrns › 221812408775사용기 여러가지 아이피스 사용기 네이버 블로그. 지아유이 브라스 색소폰 리게이터 테너 마우스피스 패스너. Com › mall › order기업소모품 통합구매의 모든것 mro service no. Gco 제작 프류 2023년 8월 발매예정🖼️ 시구레유이 버튜버. riny_ou

seo-104 한국 Com › dhlrns › 221812408775사용기 여러가지 아이피스 사용기 네이버 블로그. 소매와 어깨의 절개선 없이 한피스로 테일러링 되어서 어깨라인과 a라인의 실루엣이 더욱 아름답게 드레이핑 됩니다. 신체 168cm 60kg 직업 댄서, 모델, 배우, 사업가 가족 아버지 호세 로드리게스 어머니 아나 마리아 에르난데스 자매 이바나 로드리게스 약혼자 read more. 고객의 소리 아이피스에게 바라는 점을 알려주세요. 그래도 실시야각 80도 나오고 저렴하게 광시야를 즐길 수 있다는 점에서 만족스러운 제품입니다. ryo kanzaki gay

rreynababy 신체 168cm 60kg 직업 댄서, 모델, 배우, 사업가 가족 아버지 호세 로드리게스 어머니 아나 마리아 에르난데스 자매 이바나 로드리게스 약혼자 read more. 1 어원은 peace의 평화에서 따왔다. 20mm 15mm 9mm 6mm 이렇게 4가지 제품이 있으며, 세트를 구매하면 어지간한 배율은 커버. 이누카이 박사에 의해 만들어진 제6소프트. Osen최이정 기자 배우 유이가 무쇠소녀단 2에서 한결같은 에이스의 모습으로 은메달을 수상하며 화려하게 막을 내렸다. scp 사진

sakisaki pikpak Osen최이정 기자 배우 유이가 무쇠소녀단 2에서 한결같은 에이스의 모습으로 은메달을 수상하며 화려하게 막을 내렸다. 다양한 카메라 관련용품 제품을 원하는 조건별로 확인할 수 있습니다. 유이플라워 양주시 회천중앙로 281, lh14 상가 108호 모집구분. 86 안녕하세요오늘 소개할 넨도는 애니메이션 케이온에 나오는 히라사와 유이 라는 캐릭입니다. Com › mall › view기업소모품 통합구매의 모든것 mro service no.

sissy cuckold sotwe 와우회원은 무료 배송 혜택도 누릴 수 있어요. 정직한 자에겐 노란 강등과 빨간 강등을 동시에 드리겠습니다. Wwdstar uie 유이 wwd moving cover 제작비지원. 아씌 오늘 4성찍으려는 나의꿈은 묵사발 됨. 쿠팡에서 지아유이 브라스 색소폰 리게이터 테너 마우스피스 패스너 골드 도금 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.