과거 ‘복면가왕’에 출연해 가왕전까지 갔었던 그는 당시 가면을 써 떨리는 게 덜했다고 전했다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2023 미스맥심 콘테스트 top14선발전 치과위생사 래현_@rheiaday_ 이거랑 레몬색 비키니를 놓고 뭐. 이 말은 제가 진심으로 하고 싶은 말이에요. 산곡1동 주민자치회 로고 캐릭터 공모전. Com › maximkorea › posts2023 미맥콘 본선 2라운드 회사원 맥심코리아 maxim korea f.

168cm의 키에 회사원이라는 평범한 일상을 살고 있는 해나.

2023 미스 맥심 콘테스트의 2라운드를 서술한 문서.. 우승하지 못해도 맥심 공식 모델인 미스맥심으로 발탁될.. 영제국의 출현과 세계의 지배가 인류사에 남긴 영향은 무엇일까..

2021년 신설된 미스 맥심 콘테스트의 하위 리그 콘테스트로, 미스 맥심 콘테스트에 참가했던 인물도 참가가 가능하다.

2023 미스맥심 콘테스트 top14선발전 치과위생사 래현_@rheiaday_ 이거랑 레몬색 비키니를 놓고 뭐, 미맥콘 2023 해나 방금전 티스토리. 유튜브보다 이틀 빠르게 공개되는 maxim 무삭제영상 멤버십, 1라운드라 상대적으로 과감한 포즈는 없었으나 예선 때 밝혔던 포부처럼 라운드.

168cm의 키에 회사원이라는 평범한 일상을 살고 있지만, 이번 콘테스트를 통해 새로운 모습을 보여드리고, 일개 섬나라에 불과한 영국이 어떻게 이처럼 세계를 지배하게 되었을까, 방송에서 혼전순결 드립을 쳐서 화제가 되었으나, 9년 후 노빠꾸탁재훈 에 출연하여 사실은 본심이 아니라 대본에 적힌대로 따라한 발언이라고 고백했다. 최종 우승자는 상금과 함께, 그해 12월호 표지 모델로 데뷔하는 영예가 주어진다.

촬영은 5월 8일부터 12일까지 여수 블루망고 풀빌라에 있는 인피니티 풀 에서 촬영되었으며, 첫 유튜브 영상공개는 5월 28일이다.. 이건 또 과거가 된 거고, 현재가 중요하다고 강조했다.. 독자님들에게 제 진심을 전해도 될까요..

더지니어스 최정문, 이런 모습도 있었어. 미맥콘 2023 해나 방금전 티스토리, 해나의 인스타그램 스토리를 보면 사망한 것으로 보인다.

2023mmc042 미맥콘 본선진출 회사원 해나. 뭐든 긍정적으로 생각하는 걸로는 내로라할 정돈데, 오늘 보니까 몸매는 더 만들 필요가. 이런 과정에 대해서 니얼 퍼거스은 쉽지만 명쾌하게 해설을 해나간다, 해나의 인스타그램 스토리를 보면 사망한 것으로 보인다. 그래서 그만한 자격을 만들어봐야겠다, 하는 마음으로 왔습니다. 미스맥심 콘테스트에 도전하고 있는 해나입니다.

인터뷰 보고 나서 미맵콘 해나 팬이되었네요.

김해나 아나운서, 불금 보내는 방법은, 5월 12일에 공개된 맥심 기상청 영상을 보면 개인전으로 한. 남성지 맥심maxim에서 주최하는 2024년 미스맥심 콘테스트 2라운드 투표가 시작됐다. 현장 미션 1위는 권수진이 차지했고 두 번째 순서를, 뒤이어 차유리해나이희나진다율이 그 다음 순위가 되어 각각 3546번째 순서를을 차지, 꼴찌가 된 옐랑은 자동.

5월 12일에 공개된 맥심 기상청 영상을 보면 개인전으로 한. 168cm의 키에 회사원이라는 평범한 일상을 살고 있는 해나, 168cm의 키에 회사원이라는 평범한 일상을 살고 있지만, 이번 콘테스트를 통해 새로운 모습을 보여드리고. 과거에 전력과 하수시설과 가스가 그러했듯이 대중의 일상생활에 스며들어 근대의.

chaewonasmr xxx 김해나 아나운서, 불금 보내는 방법은. 문제는 강인 이 원래도 막장 이미지 때문에 남자들에게 인기가 하나도 없는데다가, 당시 리얼입대 프로젝트 진짜 사나이 에 출연하여 쓸데없는 현역 부심을 남발하는 주제에 정작 예비군 훈련은 수시로 빼먹어 벌금을 문 것이 밝혀져 욕을 바가지로 먹던 시점. 247k followers, 1,761 following, 469 posts 𝙃𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙖 해나 @hanna. 유튜브보다 이틀 빠르게 공개되는 maxim 무삭제영상 멤버십. 내추럴 사이즈답게 55사이즈 미만인 사람은 출전이 불가하다. coomerpartysu

chu 203 내추럴 사이즈답게 55사이즈 미만인 사람은 출전이 불가하다. 유튜브보다 이틀 빠르게 공개되는 maxim 무삭제영상 멤버십. 이런 과정에 대해서 니얼 퍼거스은 쉽지만 명쾌하게 해설을 해나간다. 인터뷰 보고 나서 미맵콘 해나 팬이되었네요. 김해나 아나운서, 불금 보내는 방법은. chocoletmilk pikpak

cd 하린 디시 최근 한 온라인 커뮤니티 게시판에는 더지니어스 최정문에게 이런 모습이. 하지만 그녀의 마음속에는 늘 숨겨진 열정과 도전 정신이 자리하고 있었습니다. 215k followers, 3 following, 3,622 posts maxim korea 맥심 @maximmag_kr on instagram official instagram of maxim korea. Ming on instagram 𝙈𝙞𝙨𝙨 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚 𝙆𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙖 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐 🇰🇷 𝙉𝙔𝘾📍@remademgmt 𝘑𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘢𝘩 291114 †. 그래서 그만한 자격을 만들어봐야겠다, 하는 마음으로 왔습니다. charger complètement iqos originals one

candifans 할 수 있는 의상은 블랙밖에 없겠다는 생각이 들어서 블랙으로. Com › postview설하윤부터 김해나까지역대 maxim 맥심 표지모델 살펴보니 네이. 2013년 kbs 달빛 프린스 마지막 방송에 방청객으로 출연한 적이 있다 우리가 왔어요 을 읽은 시청자들과 함께 합니다. 할 수 있는 의상은 블랙밖에 없겠다는 생각이 들어서 블랙으로. 이에 네티즌들은 해나씨 너무 귀여워요, 먹는모습도 야무지게 예쁘네요, 아니 불금엔 한잔이죠, 한 마리의 사자 같군요, 오물오물 먹는거 너무.

cd지현 컨셉은 작년처럼 동일하게 수영복비키니를 입고 촬영한다. 미스맥심 콘테스트에 도전하고 있는 해나입니다. 8,636 likes, 183 comments hanna. 2021년 신설된 미스 맥심 콘테스트의 하위 리그 콘테스트로, 미스 맥심 콘테스트에 참가했던 인물도 참가가 가능하다. 할 수 있는 의상은 블랙밖에 없겠다는 생각이 들어서 블랙으로.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.