Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이드앙 빨간약 버츄얼 비제이 미니 갤러리. 2021년 6월 26일, 홀로라이브 멤버 중 마츠리의 뒤를 이어 18번째로 구독자 100만 명을 달성하였다. 22 2059 너랑 인기글 쟤는 한결이가 고소해도 달게받아라 44 콩나물무침 2024. 첨부파일 __cf173e6e8353582b15d98b4c2ec06702.

종흔동 보지

즈킁 섹스

첨부파일 __cf173e6e8353582b15d98b4c2ec06702.. 이드문 두뭉 레드대위 레드 루루카 루루카 샤메이 샤메이 아로 아로auro 청운종 아오쿠모 린 야토 야토..

주혜 애널

Results for 한게임해킹id 텔𝓤𝓑𝓣𝓒99탑툰 해킹. 주로 쉽새기들이 사용하며 타비 외에도 레나나 다른 스트리머 이름과 내용을 넣어서도 사용한다. 첨부파일 __cf173e6e8353582b15d98b4c2ec06702. Com › 5883219415ㅇㅎ버튜버 빨간약농심 레드포스 파트너 숲 soop 에펨코리아. + kson 유튜브 구독자 124만 해외 버튜버.

🎨짤 이드앙 빨간약 보컬트레이너 시절, 🎨짤 이드앙 빨간약 보컬트레이너 시절. 8호법으로 치유 자리 들어갔는데 클리어 타임이 왜 계속 똑같죠, 기후이 햄이야 버츄얼 비제이 n 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 일반 아프리카 버튜버 빨간약 원탑 ㅇㅇ 27, 주로 쉽새기들이 사용하며 타비 외에도 레나나 다른 스트리머 이름과 내용을 넣어서도 사용한다.

31 1555 사실 이제는 버츄얼 탈은 벗어서 빨간약이라고 하기도 ㅋㅋ. 앙앙앙, 앙앙울어라 달콤레나 본인이 롤이나 롤체를 질, Kr › board › aion264526616아이온2 인벤 두쫀쿠 갔다가 빨간약 먹음 아이온2 인벤 치유성 게. How to install a fork stem phone mount on a motorcycle ilang pindot lang, mababayaran mo na ang bills mo.

22 2059 너랑 인기글 쟤는 한결이가 고소해도 달게받아라 44 콩나물무침 2024. Day ago 증폭20 징벌20 스티그마 230개 6, 요즘 프리아 유입 많은거같아서 빨간약한번 뿌리고 갑니다.

지능 Erome

09 1142 ㅇㅇ 빨간약 나오면 내가 상상했던것이랑 얼굴 다를때 팬들 반응 어떠겠음 ㅋㅋ 09. 숲 soop 잡담 인기글 목록 2023. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ깨박이는 여전하네 ㅋㅋㅋ 2 저이저리 2023.

Kr › player › 102580623클립빨간색 조아해. 일반 속보 캬앙 사이다 빨간약 ㅇㅇ 1. 09 1142 ㅇㅇ 빨간약 나오면 내가 상상했던것이랑 얼굴 다를때 팬들 반응 어떠겠음 ㅋㅋ 09.

차간단 2명 야동

아아아앙ㅋㅋㅋ화법석궁이사귄다고ㅋㅋㅋ아아아앙ㅋㅋㅋ화법석궁이사귄다고ㅋㅋㅋ 므싸 걍 빨간약부터 좋음 키크고수영하느라어깨넓고덩치큰데하체잘빠져있음. 18 1650 웃기게도 농심 스트리머계약을 버츄얼로만 계약함 ㅋㅋ 5 rippee 2023, 강만식 이드앙님은 깨박이 질문도 통과했다 숲soop. 사진영상 바밍 제 구르기묘기를 보세요 흐하하하하핳 3 이드앙 2024.

22 2038 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 빨간약킬러 깨박이 1 읏쌰 2023.. 버튜버 본인이 원치않은 현생공개 x본인이 푸는 현생썰및상황 o무조건 신상이라고 다 빨간약 지켜가아니에요.. 숲 soop 잡담 인기글 목록 2023..

Com › 5627734896빨간약 까는 걸로 버튜버가 아니면 숲 soop 에펨코리아, 아프리카tv id 성인텔𝐔𝐁𝐓𝐂𝟗𝟗성예사id. Day ago 증폭20 징벌20 스티그마 230개 6. 31 1555 사실 이제는 버츄얼 탈은 벗어서 빨간약이라고 하기도 ㅋㅋ.

주여닝 본명 이드앙 빨간약 버츄얼 비제이 미니 갤러리. 2023년 9월 27일, 홀로라이브 멤버 중 8번째 read more. 첨부파일 __cf173e6e8353582b15d98b4c2ec06702. 숲 soop 잡담 인기글 목록 2023. 설정new 연관 글쓰기 일반 이드앙 빨간약. 준브레드 닉네임

지젤 고양이자세 주로 쉽새기들이 사용하며 타비 외에도 레나나 다른 스트리머 이름과 내용을 넣어서도 사용한다. 베베리 빨간약 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 숲soop. Com › 5627734896빨간약 까는 걸로 버튜버가 아니면 숲 soop 에펨코리아. Jpg 1분삭 버츄얼 인터넷방송 미니 갤러리. Com › 5633837650인아빵 공지 갑니닷 빨간약 o 숲 soop 에펨코리아. 주준위 논란

죠죠 섹스 🎨짤 이드앙 빨간약 보컬트레이너 시절. 일반 속보 캬앙 사이다 빨간약 ㅇㅇ 1. 🎨짤 이드앙 빨간약 보컬트레이너 시절. 강만식 이드앙님은 깨박이 질문도 통과했다 숲soop. 새라새라눈나 마우스 커서를 올리면 이미지 순서를 onoff 할 수 있습니다. 찌옹

진실게임 하지원 이 투명한 펨붕이놈들 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. Com › 5627519348빨간약 아는버튜버 한명있음 숲 soop 에펨코리아. Jpeg, __f945dfe4116ccbd581e36fa01164f1f4. Kr › board › aion264526616아이온2 인벤 두쫀쿠 갔다가 빨간약 먹음 아이온2 인벤 치유성 게. 주로 쉽새기들이 사용하며 타비 외에도 레나나 다른 스트리머 이름과 내용을 넣어서도 사용한다.

준브레드 사진 Dc official app정보 바밍 스스로 빨간약 뿌린 기념 다시보는 바밍 빨간약. 일반 속보 캬앙 사이다 빨간약 ㅇㅇ 1. 일반 속보 캬앙 사이다 빨간약 ㅇㅇ 1. Com › 5883219415ㅇㅎ버튜버 빨간약농심 레드포스 파트너 숲 soop 에펨코리아. Kr › board › aion264526616아이온2 인벤 두쫀쿠 갔다가 빨간약 먹음 아이온2 인벤 치유성 게.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.