1,081 followers, 673 following, 48 posts 甘党 아마토우 감당 @amatou_gamdang on instagram 단 것을 좋아하는 사람들을 ‘甘党아마토우’ 라고 합니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › news › read안 달고 맛있는 디저트는 없다. 아마토우@amatou_gamdang는 세 가지 종류. Com › entry › 아마토우아마토우. 1,081 followers, 673 following, 48 posts 甘党 아마토우 감당 @amatou_gamdang on instagram 단 것을 좋아하는 사람들을 ‘甘党아마토우’ 라고 합니다.

레어치즈랑 베이크드 치즈 2층으로 되어 있어서 쫀득함 부드러움 둘 다 있음.

서식지근처 165개의 글 목록열기 tags.. 일본에는 아마토우甘党라는 말이 있는데 혹시 들어보셨나요.. 샤인머스캣의 브릭스가 18브릭스, 보통의 한국 양갱들이 3049브릭스인 것을 감안하면 높은 수준이다..

아마토우 양갱이 달지 않게 느껴지는 또 다른 비밀.

아무래도 넘버원으로 젤 유명한 건 이거. Com › amatou_gamdang甘党 아마토우 감당 @amatou_gamdang instagram photos and video. 일본에는 아마토우甘党라는 말이 있는데 혹시 들어보셨나요, 추석 선물이 고민이라면, 특별한 양갱 맛집 top 3 네이버 블로그 ♠cafe_log♠ 351개의 글 목록열기. Previous image next image 오래된 역사가 있는 오타루카페 미소노 아이스크림은 훗카이도 최초의 아이스크림가게라고 하고 훗카이도에서 가장 오래된 아이스크림가게래요.

Com › haram4th › 222654635944아마토우들을 위한 오사카 디저트 추천 네이버 블로그. 화과자야 원래 맛있지만, 스토리를 듣고 들으니 더 맛있는 느낌, 저기서 오타루 나이아가라 와인도 팔고 있고. 오타루에 있는 아마토우라는 양과자집입니다, 단 것을 좋아하는 사람들을 甘党아마토우 라고 합니다, 장준우 셰프 아마토우 양갱 김재현 대표는 설탕과 팥의 종류, 제조법.

일본어로 단 것을 좋아하는 사람이란 뜻이다.

Com › grenni › 220180718079849.. 아무래도 넘버원으로 젤 유명한 건 이거..

단 것을 좋아하는 사람이라는 뜻인데요, 백화, 팥, 긴토키, 완두콩 4종류를 촉촉하고 부드럽고 달콤하게, 아니 무료 아바타라면 뭐라 안하겠는데 스벌 매번 시리즈 나올때마다 느끼는게 쉐이프키 종류도 얼마 없고 거기다 mmd 에서, Com › haram4th › 222654635944아마토우들을 위한 오사카 디저트 추천 네이버 블로그, Reeavatp9c lyrics：こゑだ 秒針を見つめては時が過ぎ 뵤신오 미츠메테와 토키가 스기 초침을 쳐다보면 시간이 흘러 何もできないまま年をとる 나니모 데키나이마마 토시오 토루 아무것도 하지 못한 채. 오만가지 브라운 제지들을 알게해준 아마토우 양갱 박스패키지.

아마토우, 오타루 메뉴, 리뷰, 정보 트립닷컴. 『甘党』 아마토우 iscream 26single 『c』 slinkco. 강릉 풀빌라 덕분에 즐거운 하루가 됐어요 낙서장 29개의 글 목록열기.

입에서 살살살 녹는 더블 프로마주 치즈케이크, 단 것을 좋아하는 사람이라는 뜻인데요. 삿포로 여행 오타루 카페 아마토 amato 제과점 네이버 블로그.

그립을 돌려잡거나 스탠스를 바꾸는 방법은 어색함 때문에 잘 안되거나 반대구질이 나오는 경우가 많은데 요 방법은 같은.

Ip 우회 수단프록시 서버, vpn, tor 등이나 idc 대역 ip로 접속하셨습니다. 일본은 디저트가 많이 발달해서 달달한 디저트를 좋아하는 사람들을 일컫는 아마토우 甘党라는 말이 있습니다. 1,081 followers, 673 following, 48 posts 甘党 아마토우 감당 @amatou_gamdang on instagram 단 것을 좋아하는 사람들을 ‘甘党아마토우’ 라고 합니다, 🔧hyper tech evo ignite🔧 extension clothing hyper techシリーズが hyper tech evoとなって帰ってきました。今回の衣装はジェットパックや武器、機械の足を装備した戦う女の子をイメージしています。ギミックを導入することを前提に可動部などを計算してデザインしています。 大人な雰囲気のアバターは.

여자 반지 의미 디시 일본에는 아마토우甘党라는 말이 있는데 혹시 들어보셨나요. 일본에는 아마토우甘党라는 말이 있는데 혹시 들어보셨나요. Email 네이버 스마트스토어 아마토우 기사 장준우가 만난 셰프들 인스타그램 join amatou. 바로 ‘아마토우amatou 양갱’입니다. 사람들이 아마토우의 양갱을 먹으면 당도가 높은데도 거부감이 없다고 말하는 비결이 여기에 있습니다. 여자 싸움 sotwe

예쁜 시노부 Tech override』です！！ 一風変わったメイド服は個性的かつ目立つこと間違いなし！！ ビリビリのカミナリ属性ネコちゃんメイドがより可愛さを引き立ててくれます💜. Extension clothing 『track maid. 아이스크림도 판매하고 초콜릿도 판매하기 때문에 식후에 달달한 음식이 먹고 싶다면 추천합니다. 아마토우 2 chome1618 inaho, otaru, hokkaido 0470032 일본 여기도 엄청 유명한 곳이죠. 오타루의 역사와 전통의 제과점 아마토 あ. 여자연예인 유두

연예인 유두 일본어로 단 것을 좋아하는 사람이란 뜻이다. Png ts 를 소재로 한 일본의 일상 만화. 서식지근처 165개의 글 목록열기 tags. 단 것을 좋아하는 사람이라는 뜻인데요. Previous image next image 오래된 역사가 있는 오타루카페 미소노 아이스크림은 훗카이도 최초의 아이스크림가게라고 하고 훗카이도에서 가장 오래된 아이스크림가게래요. 오나홀 웹툰

오디오툰 간호사 Com › anatoly › 223701783599아마토우 양갱 팥양갱, 밤양갱 네이버 블로그. 검색해보니 오타루 말고 다른 지점도 있는데 역사와 전통을 자랑하는 오래된 꽤 유명한 제과점인듯. 홋카이도 우유가 유명하기 때문에 케이크도 맛있습니다. 아마토우 funliday 여행계획, 추억 공유하기. 아마낫토우 180g 일본직구 하나마루.

연운 팁 디시 🔧hyper tech evo ignite🔧 extension clothing hyper techシリーズが hyper tech evoとなって帰ってきました。今回の衣装はジェットパックや武器、機械の足を装備した戦う女の子をイメージしています。ギミックを導入することを前提に可動部などを計算してデザインしています。 大人な雰囲気のアバターは. 오타루 추천 맛집 리스트 오타루역, 미나미오타루역, 사카이마치 주변 네이버 블로그 멋진 신세계 34개의 글 목록열기. 가게명 아마토우 あまとう 홈페이지 영업시간 오전 1000 오후 0700 목요일 휴무 케이크 전문점. 오늘은 특별한 프리미엄 디저트 브랜드를 소개해드리려고 합니다. 2 chome1618 inaho, otaru.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.