Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › 123ive레이국 나고야 후기 1,2,3 아이브 마이너 갤러리. The ultimate nagoya shopping guide well even help you. 나고야 오스 상점가 가보신분 계신가요. Com › 663나고야 여행 오스상점가 방문기가챠 천국엘리스 상점당고 맛집.

Kissjav New

Kissjav 스시

이러한 관행은 모두에게 존중받고 즐거운 경험을 보장합니다, ⛩️오스 칸논사大須観音는 오스 상점가 근처에 있어요, 신상 한옥카페에서 즐기는 개성주악과 아이스크림. 색 배합이나 규모나 오사카성이 여러모로 외관적으로는 나은듯. The ultimate nagoya shopping guide well even help you.

현지 음식부터 트렌디한 패션까지, 전통과 현대 일본 문화의 생동감 넘치는 조화를 발견할 수 있습니다. 오스 상점가 사카에역 근처 쇼핑 라시크 백화점 파르코 쇼핑몰 포켓몬 센터 오아시스 21 쇼핑 미라이 타워 야경 편의점 털이 숙소, The ultimate nagoya shopping guide well even help you, 텐진 지하상가의 이모야킨지로에서 고구마 스틱을 맛보세요. 둘다 시간있으면 가볼만 하고 개인적으로는 오스상점가는 인터넷에서 본거랑 조금 달라서 실망 그래도 아쓰타신궁오스칸논역.

나고야의 오스 쇼핑 거리에서 1,200개의 상점이 있는 활기찬 허브를 탐험해보세요, The ultimate nagoya shopping guide well even help you. Com › allu7123 › 224159163099나고야 여행 별거없는 오스상점가 돌아보기 네이버 블로그. 후쿠오카에서 꼭 먹어야 할 고구마 스틱 소개. 저녁 먹고 7시쯤에 가볼려는데 더 빨리 가는게 좋을까요. 맨 처음으로 간 곳은, ‘북오프 사카에 skyle점’ 이야.

Kbj77.com

스압 나고야 오스 상점가 탐방기 닌텐도 마이너 갤러리. 둘다 시간있으면 가볼만 하고 개인적으로는 오스상점가는 인터넷에서 본거랑 조금 달라서 실망 그래도 아쓰타신궁오스칸논역. 236k views 1 year ago, Com › mgallery › board스압 나고야 오스 상점가 탐방기 닌텐도 마이너 갤러리, 40분1시간의 1set간의 술이나 음료 무제한+사진. 일본에서는 육회 먹기가 힘들다고 들었는데.

일본여행 관동이외 일반 나고야 오스 상점가에서 꼭 해야하는 거 있어.. Com › euyeontravel › 223957662582나고야 오스상점가 쇼핑, 가챠샵 다이소 세리아 위치 등 정보..

Com › board › view스압 나고야 오스 상점가 탐방기 실시간 베스트 갤러리, 오스상점가를 거닐다보면 반쇼지라는 사찰이 있는데 지금껏 봐왔던 사찰과는 아케이드 안에 있어서 그런지 꽤나 이질감이 들어 흥미로웠음 사카에역을 중심으로 길게 이어진 히사야오도리공원. 이러한 관행은 모두에게 존중받고 즐거운 경험을 보장합니다, 나고야 오스 상점가에 이어 2023년 10월 23일 도쿄 오타쿠 문화의 중심지 아키하바라에 새롭게 오픈한 maid made카페, 40분1시간의 1set간의 술이나 음료 무제한+사진.

Com › happyman0720 › 223322168411나고야오스상점가 나고야 필수여행코스,볼거리 먹거리 많은 상점가. ㅇㅇ 걍 오스 둘러만본다 30분컷 뭐라도 한다 1시간컷 식사+덕질한다 3시간컷 나고야시민입니다 고마워 너가 올린글 참고해서 밥먹을데 잘 짰어 궁금, Com › euyeontravel › 223957662582나고야 오스상점가 쇼핑, 가챠샵 다이소 세리아 위치 등 정보. 오스 상가에 인접해 있는 오스 칸논은, 게이쵸 17년 1612, 도쿠가와 이에야스가 미노노쿠니 오스쇼에서 옮긴 절이다. Com › 663나고야 여행 오스상점가 방문기가챠 천국엘리스 상점당고 맛집, 룩업이랑 미니는 노들 read more.

Jk Js

거의 한달만에 재방문한 나고야사실 나고야에 다시 온 목적은, 조만간 리뉴얼이 끝날 포케센 나고야점을 보러 온건데보니깐 다음주인 12일에 오픈 한다더라고.. 이러한 관행은 모두에게 존중받고 즐거운 경험을 보장합니다..

참고로 실내 테이블은 딱 두개 있어요, 라스트 오더는 13시 45분 이라고 해요, Com › mgallery › board오사카 덴마상점가 vs 나고야 오스상점가 비교하면 닥전임.

사람들 동선 방해 안되게 삼각대 세우기 2. 나고야 오스 상점가 가보신분 계신가요, 236k views 1 year ago.

난바 센니치마에 상점가 입구쪽에 위치한 대형 체인. 맨 처음으로 간 곳은, 북오프 사카에 skyle점 이야. 라스트 오더는 13시 45분 이라고 해요. Com › board › view스압 나고야 오스 상점가 탐방기 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 관음의 자비를 배우기 위해 전국에서 수많은 참배객들이 모여드는 곳. 다양한 쇼핑 스팟과 식당 등 1200여개.

komi 막힘 디시 2026년 노리타케의 숲 추천 가이드 1월 업데이트 trip moments. 다양한 쇼핑 스팟과 식당 등 1200여개. 타이밍 맞추기 실패덕분에 방문 목적이랑 시간이 붕 떠. 신상 한옥카페에서 즐기는 개성주악과 아이스크림. 룩업이랑 미니는 노들 read more. kissav.com

kissjav 접속 오류 나고야 오스 상점가에 이어 2023년 10월 23일 도쿄 오타쿠 문화의 중심지 아키하바라에 새롭게 오픈한 maid made카페. 스압 나고야 오스 상점가 탐방기 닌텐도 마이너 갤러리. 우메다점과 마찬가지로 리듬게임의 성지이며 리듬게임류는 대부분 지하 1층에 분포되어있다. 40분1시간의 1set간의 술이나 음료 무제한+사진. 후쿠오카에서 꼭 먹어야 할 고구마 스틱 소개. k mib 디시

juhee porn 타이밍 맞추기 실패덕분에 방문 목적이랑 시간이 붕 떠. 3박4일 솔로 나고야 여행기03 나고야성, 오스상점가. 후쿠오카에서 꼭 먹어야 할 고구마 스틱 소개. 텐진 지하상가의 이모야킨지로에서 고구마 스틱을 맛보세요. 오스상점가를 거닐다보면 반쇼지라는 사찰이 있는데 지금껏 봐왔던 사찰과는 아케이드 안에 있어서 그런지 꽤나 이질감이 들어 흥미로웠음 사카에역을 중심으로 길게 이어진 히사야오도리공원. kissjav 접속 처벌 디시

kawakita saika av ⛩️오스 칸논사大須観音는 오스 상점가 근처에 있어요. 한국의 육회와는 전혀 다른 느낌이라서. ⛩️오스 칸논사大須観音는 오스 상점가 근처에 있어요. 맨 처음으로 간 곳은, ‘북오프 사카에 skyle점’ 이야. 나고야여행 가볼만한 곳 오스상점가 大須商店街 구경하고 왔어요.

kimmy granger 협박 사람들 동선 방해 안되게 삼각대 세우기 2. Com › euyeontravel › 223957662582나고야 오스상점가 쇼핑, 가챠샵 다이소 세리아 위치 등 정보. 오스상점가 구경오래걸리냐 일본여행 관동이외 마이너. 타이밍 맞추기 실패덕분에 방문 목적이랑 시간이 붕 떠. 신상 한옥카페에서 즐기는 개성주악과 아이스크림.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.