Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

篠真有 しのまゆ olのエロ動画・アダルトビデオ一覧。篠真有 しのまゆ olに関係するエロ動画・アダルトビデオを高画質・格安で配信中！. 1 style シロウト史上最も詳しいj 真木詩乃 avデビュー ダウンロードurl s. Tv 免費高清av在線看 j片 av看到. Com › shinomayu篠真有｜2024年10月8日 avデビュー avの光と影.

내꼴모 트위터

『篠真有』この無料av動画が抜ける！ セックスレスのはけ口に選んだ性感マッサージで快楽フルコースに依存して借金通いする欲求不満妻 ポルチオ開発×エビ反り絶頂×大量潮吹き 篠真有 夫は仕事を言い訳にして私と一緒にいないのです。.. Fanza ファンザ「篠真有」が出演するアダルトdvd・ブルーレイ一覧。「篠真有」の人気avを値引き価格で販売！..

남자 조수

남 서연 실물 디시

1の最細jcup 史上最強の隠れ巨乳 エロの世界とは程遠い、清楚で美人な都会のol 女子大育ちで広告業界に入った華々しい生活read more, Fanza ファンザアダルトdvdレンタルで借りられる篠真有の出演作品一覧。ネットで借りて自宅までお届け♪ネットなら篠真有のdvdが手軽にレンタルできます。, 画像多数掲載 名前：篠真有（しのまゆ） 生年月日：2000年（26歳） 身長：160cm 単体本数：20本 vr作品：あり インスタグラム：なし vr妻には無い美人顔、妻には無い天然jカップ、妻には無いスレンダーボディ 結婚では手に入れられなかった真の. 1style ハイビジョン 独占配信 巨乳 デビュー作品 淫乱・ハード系 スレンダー ol 単体作品 女優 篠真有.

Fanza ファンザアダルトdvdレンタルで借りられる篠真有の出演作品一覧。ネットで借りて自宅までお届け♪ネットなら篠真有のdvdが手軽にレンタルできます。. Av史上最細jカップ爆乳女優として衝撃avデビューを飾った最強のdivaが魅せた究極のスーパーbody ！まゆちゃんが1st写真集に込めた熱い思いを語ってくれました！ ＜通常版＞. Av業界を席巻する超豪華s1専属女優25名とsexできる！ 超スーパー最高画質 8kvrベスト第2弾！ 没入感max厳選sex26コーナー1000分オーバー 下着メーカーに今も残る下劣ハラスメント・・・ 仕事の出来ない女子社員 25は、ランジェリー着用しか許されない。. 篠真有（しのまゆ）のav女優プロフィールページ。 篠真有が出演するアダルトビデオ作品一覧、無料動画、プロフィール情報（生年月日、サイズ、所属事務所など）を掲載。 現在25歳。 av女優、アダルトビデオ、無料動画について、みんなで情報交換しよう。, Sort by release date, なんじゃこのカラダ！！！！スタイルがレベチすぎたスーパー高身長モデル50sex 曲線美堪能8時間 read more.

検索ワード「 篠真有 」 該当イベント一覧. Sone807 「先生のおっぱいがクソエロいせいだ！ 」おっとり天然な女教師は不用心な濡れ透け密着jカップで生徒を欲情させ散らかす。 篠真有 725 658 5662 21521. 篠真有出演のav映画をオンラインで見る missav. 1 style 素人史上最細j 篠真有av出道篠真有. 「篠真有」検索結果 セクシーアイドルav女優のイベント情報, 1 styleシロウト史上再最細jカップという肩書・・・彼女の名前は『篠真有』。彼女について調査していきましょう！.

네루짱 통일교 디시

Watch 篠真有s av online.. All single actress multiple actresses english subtitle.. 篠真有（しのまゆ）のav女優プロフィールページ。 篠真有が出演するアダルトビデオ作品一覧、無料動画、プロフィール情報（生年月日、サイズ、所属事務所など）を掲載。 現在25歳。 av女優、アダルトビデオ、無料動画について、みんなで情報交換しよう。.. Com › actress › 25905篠真有（しのまゆ）の出演av一覧（新しい順） オナログ..

Com › shinomayu篠真有｜2024年10月8日 avデビュー avの光と影, 画像多数掲載 名前：篠真有（しのまゆ） 生年月日：2000年（26歳） 身長：160cm 単体本数：20本 vr作品：あり インスタグラム：なし vr妻には無い美人顔、妻には無い天然jカップ、妻には無いスレンダーボディ 結婚では手に入れられなかった真の, 篠真有のエロ動画 251件 動画エロタレスト. なんじゃこのカラダ！！！！スタイルがレベチすぎたスーパー高身長モデル50sex 曲線美堪能8時間 read more, スリーサイズ, b100cm w55cm h90cm.

評価・紹介 篠真有はそのjカップの豊満なバストと、スレンダーなボディが特徴的な新進気鋭のav女優です。 olとして働く一方、av業界に足を踏み入れ、そのギャップが大きな話題を呼んでいます。. Av女優として活躍する篠真有（しのまゆ）さんのプロフィールと作品一覧。 出演するアダルト動画・dvd（厳選37作品）、イメージビデオ（1作品）、年齢、スリーサイズ、カップ、スタイルなどの情報をまとめているページです。, 篠真有しのまゆ アダルトdvd・ブルーレイ通販 fanza通販, 評価・紹介 篠真有はそのjカップの豊満なバストと、スレンダーなボディが特徴的な新進気鋭のav女優です。 olとして働く一方、av業界に足を踏み入れ、そのギャップが大きな話題を呼んでいます。. Com2olm4 ジャンル モザイクあり タグ sone 篠真有 新人no, Com2olm4 ジャンル モザイクあり タグ sone 篠真有 新人no.

남자 제모크림 브라질리언 디시

Com › actress › detail篠真有 s級女優限定のavメーカーs1 no. Com › shinomayu篠真有｜2024年10月8日 avデビュー avの光と影. Com › 篠真有篠真有（しのまゆ） db. 1 style シロウト史上最も詳しいj 真木詩乃 avデビュー ダウンロードurl s, Sivr380 vrav業界を席巻する超豪華s1専属女優25名とsexできる！ 超スーパー最高画質 8kvrベスト第2弾！ 没入感max厳選sex26コーナー1000分. Tv › models › fd9c50769815de3fe12f1beeb8fc44f0篠真有 出演的av在線看 jable.

네네코마시로 갤 「篠真有」検索結果 セクシーアイドルav女優のイベント情報. 私がav業界にきた理由は 体型を生かしたかった 勉強する時間が欲しかった 実はちょっとした学校に通って ます｡・ω・｡. Com › actress › av篠真有 av動画大好き. Com › profile › shinomayu篠真有（しのまゆ）av女優 エロ動画 37作品 avfit. Fanza ファンザアダルトdvdレンタルで借りられる篠真有の出演作品一覧。ネットで借りて自宅までお届け♪ネットなら篠真有のdvdが手軽にレンタルできます。. 네토 야동 트위터

논현동 불빠따 検索ワード「 篠真有 」 該当イベント一覧. エスワン専属10月デビュー女優「篠真有しのまゆ」情報解禁！ 1 style シロウト史上最細j 篠真有 avデビューエスワン ナンバーワンスタイル 20241004 1000～. 1の最細jcup 史上最強の隠れ巨乳 エロの世界とは程遠い、清楚で美人な都会のol 女子大育ちで広告業界に入った華々しい生活read more. なんじゃこのカラダ！！！！スタイルがレベチすぎたスーパー高身長モデル50sex 曲線美堪能8時間 read more. Com › shinomayu篠真有｜2024年10月8日 avデビュー avの光と影. 남자 둘레 13cm 체감

남고 분위기 디시 『篠真有』この無料av動画が抜ける！ セックスレスのはけ口に選んだ性感マッサージで快楽フルコースに依存して借金通いする欲求不満妻 ポルチオ開発×エビ反り絶頂×大量潮吹き 篠真有 夫は仕事を言い訳にして私と一緒にいないのです。. なんじゃこのカラダ！！！！スタイルがレベチすぎたスーパー高身長モデル50sex 曲線美堪能8時間 read more. 1の最細jcup 史上最強の隠れ巨乳 エロの世界とは程遠い、清楚で美人な都会のol 女子大育ちで広告業界に入った華々しい生活read more. Sort by release date. 篠真有のエロ動画 251件 動画エロタレスト. 내마위 작가 실물

남자 신음 디시 篠真有（しのまゆ）のav女優プロフィールページ。 篠真有が出演するアダルトビデオ作品一覧、無料動画、プロフィール情報（生年月日、サイズ、所属事務所など）を掲載。 現在25歳。 av女優、アダルトビデオ、無料動画について、みんなで情報交換しよう。. 『篠真有』この無料av動画が抜ける！ セックスレスのはけ口に選んだ性感マッサージで快楽フルコースに依存して借金通いする欲求不満妻 ポルチオ開発×エビ反り絶頂×大量潮吹き 篠真有 夫は仕事を言い訳にして私と一緒にいないのです。. Av女優として活躍する篠真有（しのまゆ）さんのプロフィールと作品一覧。 出演するアダルト動画・dvd（厳選37作品）、イメージビデオ（1作品）、年齢、スリーサイズ、カップ、スタイルなどの情報をまとめているページです。. 篠真有 しのまゆ olのエロ動画・アダルトビデオ一覧。篠真有 しのまゆ olに関係するエロ動画・アダルトビデオを高画質・格安で配信中！. 『篠真有』この無料av動画が抜ける！ セックスレスのはけ口に選んだ性感マッサージで快楽フルコースに依存して借金通いする欲求不満妻 ポルチオ開発×エビ反り絶頂×大量潮吹き 篠真有 夫は仕事を言い訳にして私と一緒にいないのです。.

노은서 디시 女優名 篠真有しの まゆ デビュー時年齢 24才 ボディーサイズ 160cm b100 w55 h90 jカップ デビュー日 2024年10月8日 メーカー s1 no. Sort by release date. Av史上最細jカップ爆乳女優として衝撃avデビューを飾った最強のdivaが魅せた究極のスーパーbody ！まゆちゃんが1st写真集に込めた熱い思いを語ってくれました！ ＜通常版＞. 1の最細jcup 史上最強の隠れ巨乳 エロの世界とは程遠い、清楚で美人な都会のol 女子大育ちで広告業界に入った華々しい生活read more. Sone807 「先生のおっぱいがクソエロいせいだ！ 」おっとり天然な女教師は不用心な濡れ透け密着jカップで生徒を欲情させ散らかす。 篠真有 725 658 5662 21521.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.