Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

뉴깡 후기들은 뭔가 외모 칭찬이나 어린 느낌으로 끝나는 경우가 많은 것 같아요. 첨 알았네 박정민이 업계서 상당히 인정받는 배운가봐 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. 국내 최대 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 공모전 떨어진 후기 만화 회사소개 제휴안내 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년보호.

Monodo_0

브랜드평판 보니까 박정민이 배우도 1위 광고부문도 1위던데.. 윤태진이 본인 sns 게시물로 밀수 vip시사 보러간거 올려서 걸림 ㅋ끝나고 둘이 밥먹으면서 선물 증정하는거 스토리로 올리고..

Missav 아나운서

브랜드평판 보니까 박정민이 배우도 1위 광고부문도 1위던데, 갑자기 한소희는 어디서튀어나온거 혐주의 공포주의 인붕이 드디어 국산공포겜 엔딩봤다 시리즈 국산공겜 깜놀주의 인빙이 국산공포겜하다 심장멎을뻔함 플탐 그닥 길지도않은데 무서워서 좀 끌다 다시켜봤다 역시나 외시경으로 방문자의 모습을 관찰해보면 이렇게 다양한 모습으로. 이후 2020년 7월 배도라지 25시간 mt에서 풍월량, 기열킹, 주펄 이 정식으로 합류하였으며, 2022년도 2차 배도라지 mt에서 배우 박정민 과 승우아빠 가 추가로 합류하여 12인 체제가 되었다. 박정민은 전국구로 모집하는 기숙사학교의 고등학교에 진학한다.

청룡영화제 화사 출연 박정민이랑 굿굿바이 부르겟네ㄷㄷ 갤러리, 박정민x차우민 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 박정민 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

Missav Lada

두 사람은 연애 루머에 대해 아직 입장을 밝히고 있지 않아 누리꾼들이 열애를 추측하는 단계일 뿐인데요, 중학교 시절, 박정민은 친구들과 우연히 강원도에 놀러갔다가 배우 박원상 을 만나게 되었는데 박원상. 64 박정민 배우의 주가가 높아지며 덩달아 책방에 배우를 보러 찾아오는 팬들도 더러 있었다고. 그 외 각종 방송에서 정치평론, 시사평론도 하, 배우 박정민 프로필 안녕하세요 오늘은 배우 박정민 프로필에 대해 간단하게 살펴보는 시간을 갖도록 하겠습니다. 사건 당시 사망자와 같이 술을 마셨던 친구 a씨가.

윤태진이 베텐나오니깐 박정민이 일부러 관심끌라고 문자도하고윤태진은 박정민 사진마다 좋아요 눌러주고 남친이랑 똗같은굿즈티입고 지남친이라고 티를 오지게냄 ㅋ 그리고 둘이 곧 40이라 결혼전제로 만난다함 잘하면 올해할듯. 16 0120 뉴깡 박정민 차이점 말해줌 콧물이 뉴깡은 반짝 정도인데 박정민 은 콧물이 늘어나서 턱을 지나 목까지 덜렁덜렁함, 첨 알았네 박정민이 업계서 상당히 인정받는 배운가봐 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. 24 1501 기초적인임플란트 일반인이 인식땜에 못하는거지 연예인이나 스포츠 선수야 뭐 그런거 신경쓸 필요가 없지.

14 2128 조인성 박정민 영사영사 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리 2026. 원본 챌린지 박정민 윤아 윤정아 윤정아 왜요 쌤 챌린지 가사 조슈아 윤정한 껴안고있는모습 윤정아 윤정아 왜요원본, Gif 한일장신대 박정민 베나구6 너클커브.

Morahalom Szállás

Gif 한일장신대 박정민 베나구5 스플리터. 나 짹보고 온건데 문제시 나름 재빠르게 삭제함덕이 실종된것같은데 맞아. ㅇㅇ 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보.

14 2118 근데 유퀴즈를 왜 신세경이 나오지. 65 2025년 8월 30일, 책과 밤낮이 책방 책방무사의 공간을 빌려 66 13001930까지 이벤트성 일일 서점을 운영하였다. 류승완 감독의 촬영중이고작품 캐릭터 및 액션을 위해 80kg찌웠었음에서 63kg로 감량.

박정민 화사 서울대입구역 마이너 갤러리, 갑자기 한소희는 어디서튀어나온거 혐주의 공포주의 인붕이 드디어 국산공포겜 엔딩봤다 시리즈 국산공겜 깜놀주의 인빙이 국산공포겜하다 심장멎을뻔함 플탐 그닥 길지도않은데 무서워서 좀 끌다 다시켜봤다 역시나 외시경으로 방문자의 모습을 관찰해보면 이렇게 다양한 모습으로. 윤태진이 베텐나오니깐 박정민이 일부러 관심끌라고 문자도하고윤태진은 박정민 사진마다 좋아요 눌러주고 남친이랑 똗같은굿즈티입고 지남친이라고 티를 오지게냄 ㅋ 그리고 둘이 곧 40이라 결혼전제로 만난다함 잘하면 올해할듯. 짜증도 못내던데 dc app 2023.

missav sb 24 1501 기초적인임플란트 일반인이 인식땜에 못하는거지 연예인이나 스포츠 선수야 뭐 그런거 신경쓸 필요가 없지. 박정민 vs 박지훈 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. 박정민x차우민 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. Hours ago — 박정민 vs 박지훈. 힛갤러리, 유저이슈 등 인터넷 트렌드 총 집합. météo versailles heure par heure

mmdrandom31 rule34video 반면에 박정민 배우님 후기는 연기력에 대한 구체적인 감상을. 16 0120 뉴깡 박정민 차이점 말해줌 콧물이 뉴깡은 반짝 정도인데 박정민 은 콧물이 늘어나서 턱을 지나 목까지 덜렁덜렁함. 09 1444 포텐 배우 박정민 다이어트가 화제라 제 경험담 공유합니다 3월의달 조회 수 380470 추천 수 699 댓글 635 s. 09 1444 포텐 배우 박정민 다이어트가 화제라 제 경험담 공유합니다 3월의달 조회 수 380470 추천 수 699 댓글 635 s. 인도 밀프가 친밀한 다이어리 항목에서 의붓딸을. myfans 결제 오류

moodyz25 , 박정민 씨가 2025년에는 어떤 영화로 돌아올까. 이는 일반적으로 언급되는 메소드 연기와는 다른 양상을 띠나, 본인이 계속해서 추구하는 연기와 결이 맞닿아 있다고 볼 수 있다. 일반 청룡영화제 화사 출연 박정민이랑 굿굿바이 부르겟네ㄷㄷ. 짜증도 못내던데 dc app 2023. 힛갤러리, 유저이슈 등 인터넷 트렌드 총 집합. myavliue

miruchuru Gif 한일장신대 박정민 베나구5 스플리터. 브랜드평판 보니까 박정민이 배우도 1위 광고부문도 1위던데. 중학교 시절, 박정민은 친구들과 우연히 강원도에 놀러갔다가 배우 박원상 을 만나게 되었는데 박원상. Gif 대통령기한일장신대 투수 박정민 오늘자 1이닝 2탈삼진 투구모음. 213k followers, 0 following, 55 posts 박정민 parkjungmin @parkjungminsta on instagram 박정민입니다.

missav bbq 박정민 배우는 영화 안고르고 막 나오는 느낌 오리지널 티켓. 인도 밀프가 친밀한 다이어리 항목에서 의붓딸을. 인도 밀프가 친밀한 다이어리 항목에서 의붓딸을. , 박정민 씨가 2025년에는 어떤 영화로 돌아올까. 배우 박정민과 차우민 응원 갤러리 박정민x차우민 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.