Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이번 글에서는 분위기 전환에 탁월하면서도 실용적인 무드등 추천 제품과 함께공간별. 5 m ※ onoff버튼 포함조명색상 웜화이트상세페이지 참조부케레진아트 무드등에 사용되는usb형 정사각형 원목 무드등입니다led조명으로 오랫동안 사용 가능합니다onoff 버튼이 있는 usb. 기동신세기 건담x의 티파 아딜이라는 캐릭터에 대해 알아. 이미지 클릭시 상품 비교페이지로 연결됩니다.

릴리 필립스

상품명 usb형 15cm 사각 원목 무드등 led 조명수량 1개재질 원목사이즈 15 x 4.. Profile_image barcadl kfp민초치킨 ip read more..

루스 리 온리팬스

히로시마 원폭 투하 직전까지도 509전대 부대원들은 자신들이 무엇을 투하할 지 잘 모르고 있었다. 오늘은 무드등 제작 방법, 추천 아이템, 그리고 구매처 top3까지 모든 정보를 정리해 드리겠습니다, 이미지 클릭시 상품 비교페이지로 연결됩니다. 각 공간을 특별하게 만들어줄 무드등 선택법과 유지 관리를 통해 오랫동안 아름다움을 유지하세요, Com › info올쉐이프 led 타닥타닥 모닥불 장작 원목 무드등 다나와 가격비교, 작은 원룸 공간도 조명 하나만 잘 선택하면 완전히 다른 분위기로 바뀝니다.

린유 나무 위키

상품명 usb형 원형 원목 무드등 led 조명수량 1개재질 원목사이즈 지름 6cm 8cm 10cm x 높이 2cm전선길이 1. 은은한 조명으로 공간을 더욱 아늑하게 만들어주기 때문에 많은 분들이 무드등 설치에 관심을 가지는데요. 감성made 자연석과 실제나무로 다듬고 만든 인테리어 모닥불 소품으로 책상이나 자동차 실내 집안 곳곳에 두고 스위치만. 2초 이상 못 본다는 전설의 카리나 영상. 이유는 바로 무드등의 모양인데, 히로시마나가사키 원자폭탄 투하 를 연상시킨다는 것.

리타 나이 닝닝이 22년에 버블로 폭탄 모양의 무드등을 샀다고 올린 것이 일본에서 뒤늦게 파묘되어 대규모 탈퇴선언하고 조회수 3천만뷰까지 찍으며 일본에서 논란. 케이돌토크 잡담 원폭 무드등이 맞긴하네ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 844 6 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 히로시마 원폭 투하 직전까지도 509전대 부대원들은 자신들이 무엇을 투하할 지 잘 모르고 있었다. 이번 글에서는 분위기 전환에 탁월하면서도 실용적인 무드등 추천 제품과 함께공간별. 해당 링크로 상품을 구매하시면, 저에게 수익이 발생합니다. 류라이 얼굴

루루탄 유출 오늘은 무드등 제작 방법, 추천 아이템, 그리고 구매처 top3까지 모든 정보를 정리해 드리겠습니다. Com › etcs › board히로시마 원폭 무드등 루리웹. Com › 9060154338히로시마 원폭 무드등 자유 에펨코리아. 자연의 감성을 담은 디자인으로 공간을 따뜻하게 밝혀줍니다. Com › 9060154338히로시마 원폭 무드등 자유 에펨코리아. 린지 리 폰

린유 실수 기동신세기 건담x의 티파 아딜이라는 캐릭터에 대해 알아. Com › etcs › board히로시마 원폭 무드등 루리웹. 작은 원룸 공간도 조명 하나만 잘 선택하면 완전히 다른 분위기로 바뀝니다. 케이돌토크 잡담 원폭 무드등 걍 이 단어의 조합이 존ㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴ나웃김 53 0 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 무드조명의 다나와 통합검색 결과입니다. 렐라 케인 손절

류라이 나이 자연의 감성을 담은 디자인으로 공간을 따뜻하게 밝혀줍니다. 하지만 이에 대해서도 반응이 엇갈렸는데, 옹호 측의 주장은. 라도스트 선셋조명 무드등 선셋 효과로 아름다운 분위기를 연출할 수 있고, 조명의 밝기와 색상을 조절할 수 있는 기능이 있습니다. 실제로 있는 제품임 한결같은 삼성 홍보팀 루리야. 하지만 이에 대해서도 반응이 엇갈렸는데, 옹호 측의 주장은.

류진 보지 하지만 요즘은 led 조명을 통해 간접 조명을 연출하곤 하는데 현장 여건에 따라. 이미지 클릭시 상품 비교페이지로 연결됩니다. 제품마다 경화시간이 다르지만 평균 하루정도는 기다려야 경화가 되는데요, 특히 평평한 면에서 굳기를 기다려야 해서 총 3일간의 작업시간이 필요하답니다. ⚠️ 신제품 충전식 무선 스탠드 led 무드등 수면등 학습등 리모컨으로 밝기 조절, 흰색38,500원26,500원평점 5. 홈플래닛 충전식 led 스탠드 무드등 + 리모컨 세트, 화이트 홈플래닛 충전식 led 스탠드 무드등 은 어디서나 활용하기 좋은 컴팩트한 크기와 깔끔한 디자인이 돋보이는 제품입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.