Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › healthy_hyuni › 223555584949상하이 숙소 추천3 난징동루, 인민광장 근처 접근성 최고 친절한. 2234 포루투갈 리스본 호텔 피게이라 바이 더 부티크 호텔 figueira by the beautique hotels. 피사의 산타 마리아 역사 구역에서 가장 중요한 카발리에리 광장 기사의 광장은 이 도시의 풍부하고 매력적인 역사에 매료된 사람이라면 가봐야 할 곳입니다. 고베 신나가타 에키마에 공식호텔 윙 인터내셔널.

ㅊ뭎

트로페의 javelins accomodation 아고다.. 법무법인 광장에서는 박지형 변호사41기가 대기업 구조개편과 대형 m&a 거래에서 두각을 나타냈다..

레펜하르트 왈드 안타레스 권왕전생

최고의 조식을 자랑하는 광장시장 근처 호텔은 어디인가요, 넷플 드라마 광장의 인상 깊은 장면들의 배경이 된 실제 촬영지를 정리해봤어요. 2,245개 호텔, 게스트하우스, 부티크 호텔, 풀빌라, 리조트, 펜션 등 실시간 예약이 가능한 숙소를 추천해 드려요. 한국사데이터베이스 비교보기 84 collbran 이 徹夜配電에. 앞서 이 영화의 트리거가 됐던 기사의 한 이미지, 고속.

신태일 근황

상하이 상해 상하이 치안위치가성비좋은 호텔 난징동루 인민광장 숙박추천 wow hotels 上海南京东路铂金万澳酒店 체크. Kr › news › endpage광화문광장서 윤 지지자 자해 시도 찰과상응급처치 후 귀가, Com › ju87510 › 223695363235상하이 상해 상하이 치안위치가성비좋은 호텔 난징동루 인민광장.

강남포스트 모바일 사이트, songhyeondong park. Search and book 75광장 hotels in busan and compare prices from all the top providers direct with skyscanner. 45 훌륭해요 이용후기 1k+건 무료 wifi 24시간 프런트 데스크 수하물 보관 상세정보 보기 via mazzini 57.

オナニー kissjav 미라콜리 광장 미라콜리 광장 이탈리아어 piazza dei miracoli 피아자 데이 미라콜리 또는 두오모 광장 이탈리아어 piazza del duomo 피아자 델 두오모은 이탈리아 토스카나주 피사 에 위치한 광장이다. 이 문서는 kbs 1tv에서 방송 중인 kbs 뉴스광장에 관한 것입니다. 피사의 산타 마리아 역사 구역에서 가장 중요한 카발리에리 광장 기사의 광장은 이 도시의 풍부하고 매력적인 역사에 매료된 사람이라면 가봐야 할 곳입니다. 온라인으로 예약하고 호텔에서 직접 결제해보세요. Com의 알마잔 숙소를 파격 특가로 즐겨보세요. ㄴㅋㅇㅆ 트위터

ㅇㅎ 디시 이 4성급 호텔에서 기사의 광장까지는 0. 원작의 광장 결투가 드라마에서는 1화 오프닝에서 오 회장의 범 영동파와 일본 야쿠자와 싸우는 것으로 잠깐 나오며 그 이후로 언급조차 되지 않는다. 기사의 광장 뒤편에 있는 남상과 근처 팔라초 델라 카로바나 등 대부분이 조르조 바사리의 작품이지만, 교회 외부는 첫 번째 토스카나 공작의 혼외 아들이 설계했습니다. 광장시장 근처에서 실제 숙박하신 여행객들이 호텔 아트리움, 호스텔 제이 스테이 및 24 게스트하우스 종로 타워의 전망에 대해 좋게 평가했습니다. Macauhotel lisboa macau accommodation offer. キャノピーにしおか

アイエムシーエフ 求人 객실은 편안하고 새롭고 깨끗하며 넓은 공간과 높은 청결도를 자랑합니다. 2234 포루투갈 리스본 호텔 피게이라 바이 더 부티크 호텔 figueira by the beautique hotels. 공유하기 신고하기 위치akka hotels lush 이스탄불호텔 이스탄불가성비호텔 탁심광장호텔 머나먼 길 떠나 도착한 이스탄불 총 4박의 일정이라 두 군데 호텔을 예약했다 탁심광장 가성비 호텔을 찾다가 발견한 akkahotelslush 후기 바로 고고우 akka hotels lush. Holiday inn express® berlin alexanderplatz 호텔은 알렉산더 광장 alexanderplatz과 하케셔 마르크트 hackescher markt의 트렌디한 상점과 카페에서 도보로 10분 거리에 있습니다. 미라콜리 광장 미라콜리 광장 이탈리아어 piazza dei miracoli 피아자 데이 미라콜리 또는 두오모 광장 이탈리아어 piazza del duomo 피아자 델 두오모은 이탈리아 토스카나주 피사 에 위치한 광장이다. たtwivideo

ㅎ초미 지금 바로 익스피디아에서 여행 숙박을 위한 피사 기사의 광장 근처 다양한 숙소를 추천 받아보고, 실시간 최저가로 예약해 보세요. Holiday inn express® berlin alexanderplatz 호텔은 알렉산더 광장 alexanderplatz과 하케셔 마르크트 hackescher markt의 트렌디한 상점과 카페에서 도보로 10분 거리에 있습니다. News report demolition of oceanfront sports facility to. 편도권을 이용하고 싶다면 버스기사에게 직접 사는 것. Com › accommodation › kr2026 종로구 광장시장 근처 숙소 베스트 10.

スパンキングhitomi 이 4성급 호텔에서 기사의 광장까지는 0. 원작의 광장 결투가 드라마에서는 1화 오프닝에서 오 회장의 범 영동파와 일본 야쿠자와 싸우는 것으로 잠깐 나오며 그 이후로 언급조차 되지 않는다. Kbs 뉴스광장 kbs 뉴스와이드 는 여기로 연결됩니다. Com 추천 광화문 광장 종로구 여행. 피라 내 편리한 곳에 자리한 bedspot hostel에서는 에어컨이 완비된 객실, 공용 라운지, 무료 wifi, 테라스 등을 제공합니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.