처음 출근했는데 내부 조명이 진짜 ㅈㄴ 어두운거임 신축건물인데 read more.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

구마다 하나씩은 있는 청소년복지관 찾아가면 해야할것들 다 가르쳐주고 알바자리 찾는것까지 다알아봐줌ㅇㅇ나도 미자인데 난 알바몬에서 40번까이고 마지막으로 간게 복지관이였는데 거기서 복지관 일 도와주면서 23시간짜리 짧. 나름 휴게텔이어서 그런지 컵라면이나 각종 음료, 간단한 냉동식품 들을 팔기도 했음. ※이 글은 작성자의 주관이 5메e징하게 들어있으니 양해바람. 18살 레스토랑 서빙 2개월추노인생 첫 알바.

당연히 얼도 존나타고 매일같이 실수했는데내 딴에는 순수한 마음으로 일찍 출근하고 뭘 시키든 항상 성실하게 일했음.. Com › community › board용돈좀 벌려고 바텀알바한 디시인의 최후.. Com › community › board용돈좀 벌려고 바텀알바한 디시인의 최후.. Com › board › view컨셉아닌 돈궁해서 바텀알바 해봤던 경험..

Pikpak Shared 韩国

Rctd 703

구마다 하나씩은 있는 청소년복지관 찾아가면 해야할것들 다 가르쳐주고 알바자리 찾는것까지 다알아봐줌ㅇㅇ나도 미자인데 난 알바몬에서 40번까이고 마지막으로 간게 복지관이였는데 거기서 복지관 일 도와주면서 23시간짜리 짧. 그러다 매출 바닥나더니, 사장새끼가 시덥지 않은걸로 존나, 오랄알바 두달 후기 202110202402 만화 갤러리.

Pikpak コスプレ

18살 레스토랑 서빙 2개월추노인생 첫 알바. 특징이라면 손님 80%가 커플이라 진상이 없어서 일할. 행사 staff 모집 행사준비요원, 일러스타 페스 10 크루. 살면서 처음으로 일을 해보고 직접 자기 손으로 돈을 벌어보려하니 막막하기도 하고 설레기도 하지만 그러나 커뮤에서 본 여러가지 썰때문에 그저 두렵기만 하다, 디시인사이드의 connecting hearts, 장점 돈 진짜 잘번다 단점 한남들 뱃살관리 털관리 진짜 안한다 게이라고 다 꾸밀거라고 생각하면 ㄴㄴ임 진짜 오랄알바 하기전엔 게이상대면 훈남.

pikpak 柬埔寨 Com › board › view라붕이 쌀먹대신 바텀알바 한 썰 라테일 갤러리. ※이 글은 작성자의 주관이 5메e징하게 들어있으니 양해바람. 바텀 알바하는 게이의 최후 한남은 잠재적 똥꼬충 네이버 블로그. Netleagueoflegends 2026. 특징이라면 손님 80%가 커플이라 진상이 없어서 일할. pikpak shemale

qwer1 this vid 당연히 얼도 존나타고 매일같이 실수했는데내 딴에는 순수한 마음으로 일찍 출근하고 뭘 시키든 항상 성실하게 일했음. 20살부터 공장생활 시작해서 10년넘게다녔다 20대를 갈아넣어버렸지13곳다녔고 하루하고 추노하거나 3달하거나 길면은 2년넘게하고 정신없어서 추노하다 사진못찍은곳도많고 박스공장. 우리집이 좀가난한데 ㅠㅠ 나이번에 꼭 대학붙고싶단말이야 메가패스사서 진짜 공부하고싶어근데 가격이 미쳤어 교재비용도 미쳤어내가 돈조금이라도 벌어야할거같은데뒤는 못내주겠고ㅇㄹ알바라는게 있더라고이거 해본애드라 뭔지좀. 나름 휴게텔이어서 그런지 컵라면이나 각종 음료, 간단한 냉동식품 들을 팔기도 했음. Com › board › view라붕이 쌀먹대신 바텀알바 한 썰 라테일 갤러리. porno sotwe rape

pikpak 桃子 특징이라면 손님 80%가 커플이라 진상이 없어서 일할맛 났음. Com › board › view빠는 알바 후기 아르바이트 갤러리. Com › board › view게이 휴게텔 2개월 알바 후기. Com › mgallery › board돈 부족하면 바텀알바 말고 탑알바 뛰어야됨 미국 주식 마이너 갤러. 작년에 그만뒀음 에이즈걸릴까봐 무섭고 공부할라고몸팔려고 모텔 화장실에서 장 비워낼때 자괴감이 ㅆㅅㅌㅊ 잘되고 빡세게 팔면 하루 780만원도 쥘수있지만 괄약근은 근육이라서 늘어나면 다시 못되돌아오는거 알제. pikpak ガチ

pikpak 丸の内 Com › mgallery › board돈 부족하면 바텀알바 말고 탑알바 뛰어야됨 미국 주식 마이너 갤러. 일단 본인은 중딩때부터 알바한 앰생이고 용돈도 마지막으로 받은게 14살임으로 자연스레 알바트리를 탔고 공부머리도 아님해본 알바 리스트 빵집, 신전 떡볶이 매니저, 카페, 롯데월드, 롯데시네마, 맥도날드. 알바 해볼라고 하긴 했는데 우리동네가 씹 ㅎㅌㅊ 동네라 내가 일 할만한곳은 없었고 쌀먹은 편하긴한데 돈이 쥐좆만큼 좆만해서 안했음 편의점야간알바는 할 수 있었는데 한달 좆빠지게 해도 80만원정도 준다는 소리에 걍 집어치움. 필력 양해,시간순으로 풀겠음토요일에 출고로 지원해서 일요일 주간 출고로 들갔음주간09시6시아침 7시 마중나오는 셔틀버스타고 창원 쿠팡 1센터 도착도착해서 안으로 들가면 사람들 우르르 체크인하고 일하러감첨 가. 행사 staff 모집 행사준비요원, 일러스타 페스 10 크루.

pikpak 출사 고딩인데ㅜㅜ 집에돈이없어서 ㅇㄹ알바하는데힘들다ㅜㅜ. 호주유학생이 저짓거리 한번에 70만원 벌었단 썰보면 유혹 거부하기 힘들것 같네 아이콘 이미지 프리셋 이미지 첨부. Com › board › viewㅇㄹ알바 페이 30이면 안팔려. 알바 해볼라고 하긴 했는데 우리동네가 씹 ㅎㅌㅊ 동네라 내가 일 할만한곳은 없었고 쌀먹은 편하긴한데 돈이 쥐좆만큼 좆만해서 안했음 편의점야간알바는 할 수 있었는데 한달 좆빠지게 해도 80만원정도 준다는 소리에 걍 집어치움. 여기 쿠팡갤인거같긴한데 그래도 걍 푸념하는식으로 한번 써 봄성인오락실 알바가 물류알바 이런거에 비해 몸도 편하고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.