Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

프로필 상 166cm의 장신으로 실제 키는 비슷하거나 그것보다 더 큰 것으로 보이며, 슬랜더한 몸매에 흰 피부, av 배우 중에서도 탑을 달리는 상당히 예쁘고 귀여운 얼굴과. Av 배우 프로필 파일하시모토아리나사진. Thank you for everything, arata arina, the quintessential slender. 1일 29분 54초 내 결제시 오늘 발송.

Qdvo 디시

Pikpak 削除

조회 수 542327 추천 수 1040 댓글 456 s. 프로필상으로는 166cm지만 실제로는 170이 넘을 것으로 추정된다. 이전 이름에 굉장히 애착이 있던지라 은퇴도 고려했으나 지금은 아리나라는 이름은 지켜서 만족한다고 한다. 이후 2020년 5월 팔레노 전속이 되었다가 2022년 8월 아라타 아리나라는 새로운 이름과 함께 무디즈로 이적 후 꾸준한 활동을 보였습니다, 아라타 아리나 하시모토 아리나 6th 사진집 카미파라.

2022년 9월에 moodyz 로 이적했으며, 활동명도 하시모토 아리나에서 아라타 아리나로 변경했다.. 방학때 고향으로 남자친구와 놀러간 아리나씨 고향에서 그녀를 기다린 소꿉친구는 남자친구와 같이 온 아리나를 보고 배신감을 느끼는데.. 아라타 아리나 mida154,mida 154 출시일 20250520 출연 아라타 아리나 제작사 무디즈 레이블 moodyz diva 감독 야마구치 토렌데이 재생시간 120분..

Pikpak Pregnant

일본의 av 배우인 하시모토 아리나아라타 아리나에 대한 소개글입니다, Com › 3mtissue › 223702089127아라타 아리나, 은퇴 선언 네이버 블로그, 조회 수 542327 추천 수 1040 댓글 456 s. Com › lyc7248 › 223702424202아라타 아리나도 은퇴하는구나 네이버 블로그.

Pikpak Emoechi

Av 배우 치고는 큰 편인 167cm에 무엇보다 다리가 길다, Com › 20아라타 아리나 하시모토 아리나 av 이야기, 아라타 아리나의 최신작 & 프로필 arata arina, 新ありな 배우. 2018년 dmm 어워드 여우주연상 수상. 하시모토 아리나橋本ありな, 그리고 현재의 아라타 아리나新ありな, 이런 아라타 아리나가 1년 후인 2025년 12월을 끝으로 av 배우에서 은퇴를 한다고 선언하였다.

pornhub 아라타 아리나는 2016년 3월 하시모토 아리나라는 이름으로 데뷔했으며 예쁜 얼굴과 슬렌더 몸매로 많은 인기를 얻었습니다. 방학때 고향으로 남자친구와 놀러간 아리나씨 고향에서 그녀를 기다린 소꿉친구는 남자친구와 같이 온 아리나를 보고 배신감을 느끼는데. 아라타 아리나는 2016년 3월 하시모토 아리나라는 이름으로 데뷔했으며 예쁜 얼굴과 슬렌더 몸매로 많은 인기를 얻었습니다. Av 배우 치고는 큰 편인 167cm에 무엇보다 다리가 길다. Day ago 젊음의 복수, 특별한 피스톤으로 성인 구매 크림피. pikpak 昭和

pikpak c2joy 역대급 미모의 장신 슬렌더 미소녀로 불리는 아라타 아리나. 프로필상으로는 166cm지만 실제로는 170이 넘을 것으로 추정된다. 하시모토 아리나橋本ありな, 그리고 현재의 아라타 아리나新ありな. 아라타 아리나r135 판 av 여배우 1996년 출생 2016년 데뷔 가나가와현 출신 인물 성인물 배우 출신 유튜버. 아라타 아리나 arina arata 품번. puuurynn onlyfans

raikun325 candfans 이런 아라타 아리나가 1년 후인 2025년 12월을 끝으로 av 배우에서 은퇴를 한다고 선언하였다. 귀여운 얼굴에 하얀 피부에 명랑한 성격. 아라타 아리나가 지난 12월 21일 자신의 유튜브 라이브를 통해 은퇴를 선언하고 2025년 12월 31일 av 여배우를 그만둘 것이라고 발표했다. Combest 하시모토 아리나로 잘 알려진 아라타 아리나가 본인의 유튜브를 통해 av 은퇴를 발표함 은퇴 시점은 내년 12월이 될 것이라고 게시판 이력. 프로필상으로는 166cm지만 실제로는 170이 넘을 것으로 추정된다. pikpak 媚黑

pikpak psycho 아라타 아리나, 당신이 몰랐던 6가지 사실 l 하시모토 아리나. 방학때 고향으로 남자친구와 놀러간 아리나씨 고향에서 그녀를 기다린 소꿉친구는 남자친구와 같이 온 아리나를 보고 배신감을 느끼는데. 아라타 아리나 하시모토 아리나 6th 사진집 카미파라 aa샵. 아리나 아라타는 디지털 미디어에서 뜨거운 감정을 이끌어내는 현상으로, 이를 통해 수많은 팬의 마음을 사로잡고 있습니다. Com › 84일본av배우 아라타 아리나 新ありな, arina arata, s1의 여왕 은.

pikpak 펨돔 아라타 아리나 하시모토 아리나 6th 사진집 카미파라. 그래도 다행히 앞으로 1년간은 볼 수 있습니다. 아리나 아라타는 디지털 미디어에서 뜨거운 감정을 이끌어내는 현상으로, 이를 통해 수많은 팬의 마음을 사로잡고 있습니다. 불안했던 시작부터지금까지 함께해 준 분들에. 하시모토 아리나로 잘 알려진아라타 아리나가 본인의 유튜브를 통해av 은퇴를 발표함은퇴 시점은 내년 12월이 될 것이라고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.