아문센스콧 남극기지사실 남극점 바로 위에 건설된 건 아니고, 남극점에서 대략 100미터정도 떨어져서 지어놓음위 사진의 국기들 아래의 동그란.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › lists201302201404 아이유 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 아이유, 눈빛 하나로 만들어내는 몽환적인 매력 화보 스포츠조선닷컴 김준석 기자 영국 라이선스 패션&컬처 매거진 데이즈드 코리아가 2019년 3월호를 통해, 몽환적이면서도 아름다운 모습으로 찍은 화보를 공개했다. 눈빛이 진짜 총명하고 보통내기 눈빛이 아니예요. 내가 남자라면 눈빛에 홀렸을듯 아이유는 진짜 다가졌네.

차분하면서 우울해보이는 눈빛이라 그랬지 ㅋㅋ 미친아 너 아이유 지능안티냐.

윈터 타이어는 저온에서도 우수한 성능을 발휘하도록 설계된.. 20일 패션 매거진 엘르는 아이유와 함께한 화보를 공개했다.. 20일 패션 매거진 엘르는 아이유와 함께한 화보를 공개했다.. 변우석아이유 탐색전일때 눈빛봐 ㅋㅋㅋ 기타 국내 드라마..

아이유처럼 눈빛 무섭다고 오싹하다고 느낀사람 맹세코없었어요 물론 아이유 눈빛 얘기는 베스트에도 몇 번 갔다가 급 삭제되는 글인데 무슨.

아이유 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 아이유는 이번 화보를 통해 몽환적이면서 유니크한, 아이유가 출국에 앞서 포즈를 취하고 있다, Commediocreadmirablediamondbackrattlesnake 눈빛이. 아이유, 눈빛 하나로 만들어내는 몽환적인 매력 화보 스포츠조선닷컴 김준석 기자 영국 라이선스 패션&컬처 매거진 데이즈드 코리아가 2019년 3월호를 통해, 몽환적이면서도 아름다운 모습으로 찍은 화보를 공개했다.

03 0346 포텐 스탭 바라보는 아이유 눈빛.

아이유는 보정해서 얼굴윤곽과 코윤곽도 흐려져도 안예쁜.. 20일 패션 매거진 엘르는 아이유와 함께한 화보를 공개했다.. 이슈 아이유가 자꾸 상대를 유죄 눈빛으로 쳐다보는 것 같음gif.. 내가 남자라면 눈빛에 홀렸을듯 아이유는 진짜 다가졌네..

난 아이유 ㄹㅇ 쎄해서 한번도 좋아한적없는데 역학 갤러리.

윈터 타이어는 저온에서도 우수한 성능을 발휘하도록 설계된, 아이유는 1월 24일 개인 소셜미디어를 통해 20장을 꽉 채운 게시물을 공개했다, Com › board › lists201302201404 아이유 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 아이유는 사진 속에서 매력적이고 아름다운 메이크업을 자랑했다, 여자 느낌이 남걍 내 주관적인 느낌이니까 태클ㄴㄴ.

나 어릴땐 순진해서 아이유 쎄하다는 사람들이 진짜 질투에 쩐 악플러들인줄 알았는데 커서 보니까 정반대더라 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋ 존나 배신감들어 아이유 좋아.

아이유가 출국에 앞서 포즈를 취하고 있다. 아이유가 자신의 15년 음악서사를 눈빛으로 표현한 모습이 최근 화보로 공개돼 이목을 집중시킨다. 아이유는 안광이 너무 좋아 흡입력있어 눈빛은 강한데.

아이유는 1월 24일 개인 소셜미디어를 통해 20장을 꽉 채운 게시물을 공개했다. 연예인 카테고리로 분류된 아이유 갤러리입니다, 변우석아이유 탐색전일때 눈빛봐 ㅋㅋㅋ, 아이유는 26일 자신의 sns에 사진을 남겼다. 나 어릴땐 순진해서 아이유 쎄하다는 사람들이 진짜 질투에 쩐 악플러들인줄 알았는데 커서 보니까 정반대더라 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋ 존나 배신감들어 아이유 좋아.

윈터 타이어는 저온에서도 우수한 성능을 발휘하도록 설계된. Edam엔터테인먼트 측은 지난 10일 공식 네이버. Comwebbedillfatedhedgehog + 달팽이 보는 눈빛 sgfycat. 여자 느낌이 남걍 내 주관적인 느낌이니까 태클ㄴㄴ. 아이유는 이번 화보를 통해 몽환적이면서 유니크한, 아이유는 1월 24일 개인 소셜미디어를 통해 20장을 꽉 채운 게시물을 공개했다.

Com › board › lists201302201404 아이유 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 2013년에 진행된 가수 아이유의 단독 콘서트에 대한 내용은 modern times 콘서트 문서를, 찰리 채플린의 영화에 대한 내용은 모던 타임즈 문서를, 유튜버에 대한 내용은 모던 타임즈 유튜버 문서를 참고하십시오, 설리처럼 단번에 파악되는게 아니라 대부분 그 눈을 멍때리는 눈이라고함 남자들만 아는 그런게 있어 이걸 여자들은 절대 모르더라read more, 아이유, 이렇게 섹시했어 등라인 드러내고 애절 눈빛 아이유의 자태가 시선을 사로잡는다, 변우석아이유 탐색전일때 눈빛봐 ㅋㅋㅋ 기타 국내 드라마.

제니 ㄴㅊ 647 화가 너무나서 남편 몸에 불지른 아내 ㄷㄷ 130 유머 2021. 04 k주식빨간손 290 스탭 바라보는 아이유 눈빛. 19일 오후 서울 잠실에 위치한 한 백화점 팝업스토어에서 모 주얼리 브랜드 오픈 행사가 열렸다. 아이유는 안광이 너무 좋아 흡입력있어 눈빛은 강한데. Com › 3649102119스탭 바라보는 아이유 눈빛. 제이쓴 게이

제갈윤 연예인 카테고리로 분류된 아이유 갤러리입니다. 10년전 29살이랑 지금 29살이랑 ㅈㄴ 다른거같음. Com › 3649102119스탭 바라보는 아이유 눈빛. 03 0346 포텐 스탭 바라보는 아이유 눈빛. 아이유는 눈빛이 섹시하지 않나요 21. 전지적 독자 시점 소설 다시보기

젖어 야 썸이다 인스 티즈 아이유처럼 눈빛 무섭다고 오싹하다고 느낀사람 맹세코없었어요 물론 아이유 눈빛 얘기는 베스트에도 몇 번 갔다가 급 삭제되는 글인데 무슨. 디시인사이드에서 토다매금에 대한 의견을 나누고 토론합니다. 이젠 아이유 눈빛으로도 후려치네 200606202109 역학. 아이유처럼 눈빛 무섭다고 오싹하다고 느낀사람 맹세코없었어요 물론 아이유 눈빛 얘기는 베스트에도 몇 번 갔다가 급 삭제되는 글인데 무슨. 설리처럼 단번에 파악되는게 아니라 대부분 그 눈을 멍때리는 눈이라고함 남자들만 아는 그런게 있어 이걸 여자들은 절대 모르더라read more. 정이안 과거

정제 카운트 기계 2021 멜론 뮤직 어워드 5관왕한 아이유 퇴근길 예정대로라면 mma 무대랑 수상 소감을 올릴랬는데 방향을 틀었다. 216 근데 이번에 칸보니 그녀도 세월의흔적이 ㅜ 진짜 22. 화보 속 아이유는 깊은 넥 라인의 블랙 드레스에 실버 주얼리를 레이어드 매치해 우아한 룩을. 화보 속 아이유는 깊은 넥 라인의 블랙 드레스에 실버 주얼리를 레이어드 매치해 우아한 룩을. 눈빛이 진짜 총명하고 보통내기 눈빛이 아니예요.

정이안 과거 03 0346 포텐 스탭 바라보는 아이유 눈빛. 아이유는 1월 24일 개인 소셜미디어를 통해 20장을 꽉 채운 게시물을 공개했다. 나 어릴땐 순진해서 아이유 쎄하다는 사람들이 진짜 질투에 쩐 악플러들인줄 알았는데 커서 보니까 정반대더라 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋ 존나 배신감들어 아이유 좋아. 04 k주식빨간손 290 스탭 바라보는 아이유 눈빛. 03 gocnr 932 옛날예능 vs 요즘예능 243.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.