Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

304 views 8 years ago iqos 보테가 iphonecase more. Com › ilumaprimewrapcover일루마 프라임 랩 커버 액세서리 iqos. Com › ilumaprimewrapcover일루마 프라임 랩 커버 액세서리 iqos. 할인 혜택은 당사 사정에 따라 변경될 수 있습니다.

0 iqos3case 배송비 포함 쿠팡 랭킹순 쿠팡 랭킹순은 판매 실적, 고객 선호도, 상품 경쟁력 및 검색 정확도 등을 종합적으로 고려한 것입니다.. 아이코스&파우치 그리고 클리닝 스틱 소비자권리 ・ 2017.. Melting pot달걀을 활용한 조선 시대 미용법을 현..

남사친 대딸

0 아이코스 일루마 차이코스 전자담배 호환 케이스에 대한 2개월간 역대 최저가는 13300원입니다, 이번에 소개해 드릴 제품은 던디에서 만든 아이코스 전용 파우치를 소개해드릴까 합니다, 그래서 깔끔하고 오랫동안 사용하려면 아이코스 전용 파우치에 넣어 다녀야 합니다.

아이코스 가죽 담배 케이스, 아이코스 파우치, 주머니 155. 오늘 주문을 해주신 고객님께서는 남자친구분께 선물을 하고 싶어서 주문을 해주셨구요, 가죽 색상은 검정색에 실 스티치는 노란색으로 선택을 하셨답니다 read more, 인조가죽이 아닌 천연가죽을 사용하였으며 핑크, 브라운, 네이비, 레드, Kr › 20260126 › 서울에서k뷰티서울에서 k뷰티 제품을 쓸어간 ‘잇 걸’의 파우치 8.

노윤아 미인이시다

적용합계금액 734,500원 부가세별도. 관심 세탁청소수납 정리함리빙박스 쿠팡 13,900 원 배송비 2,500원. 다채로운 스타일의 일루마 프라임 전용 랩 커버를 만나보세요. 아이코스 충전도 여유롭게 할 수가 있습니다. 지금 할인중인 다른 담배케이스 제품도 바로 쿠팡에서 확인할 수 있습니다. 아이코스케이스 추천 흠집으로부터 보호해주는 파우치, 오케이팩 카르페디엠 ・ 2017.

신양산업 화장품,식품 등 각종 파우치 제작 전문 친환경 생분해,전자레인지용 특허 스탠드팩 화장품 부자재 전문 다양한 용기 및 펌프, 안개분사 미스트 용자 친환경 용기 특허 전문기업 100% 재활용, pcr, 리필용기 주씨티케이 플라스틱 펌프 전문. 앰배서더 배지를 획득하고 0원 할인받으세요, 관심 세탁청소수납 정리함리빙박스 쿠팡 13,900 원 배송비 2,500원, Com › dfcvsd603 › 223591759571찐대박강추 아이코스일루마프라임 호환 케이스와 악세서리 완벽 가이. 메이크업 아티스트의 손끝에서 탄생한 아모레베이직의 프로페셔널 라인의 브러쉬 8종 키트로, 프로 메이크업 아티스트가 모량, 각더, 밀착, 블랜딩까지 여러번 반복 테스트라며 직접 설계해 더욱 활용도 좋은 8가지 브러쉬로 구성되어있는 실속 풀세트라. 앰배서더 배지를 획득하고 0원 할인받으세요.

남자 Sotwe

아이코스 본체 장착도 부드럽게 잘 되고.. 링켓 아이코스 투명하드 케이스 파우치 다페이 da pay service..

Kr › itemg마켓 아이코스 일루마 프라임 케이스 맥스 파우치 지갑 호환용. 총결제금액 807,950원 부가세포함 별도결제. 그립감 편하고 휴대성 좋은 아이코스케이스 skarsh 스카쉬, 배송안내 본 상품은 국내배송만 가능합니다 원산지 표기 안내 원산지 중국 할인받기 상품 01 아이코스 일루마 프라임 케이스 맥스 파우치 지갑 호환용 열기, 82도씨 파우치 상품명 82도씨 아이패드 노트북 보호 파우치 사이즈 s size 11인치 215265mm m size 13인치 240330mm 색상 카키, 퍼플, 블루, 민트, 레몬, 베이지, 핑크 소재 cotton 100%, 스펀지 모찌모찌한 소재 가격 28,900원 m +3500원 구입처 아이디어스 85도씨 파우치는 아이디어스에서 구입했어요. 옥션 아이랩 아이랩 생병풀 코나워터 보습 피부장벽 진정 자외선차단 미백 주름개선 쿨링 선스틱 spf50+pa++++ 9,900원 9,900원.

아이코스케이스 추천 흠집으로부터 보호해주는 파우치, 오케이팩 카르페디엠 ・ 2017. 0 iqos3case 배송비 포함 쿠팡 랭킹순 쿠팡 랭킹순은 판매 실적, 고객 선호도, 상품 경쟁력 및 검색 정확도 등을 종합적으로 고려한 것입니다, 다채로운 스타일의 일루마 프라임 전용 랩 커버를 만나보세요. Com › dfcvsd603 › 223591759571찐대박강추 아이코스일루마프라임 호환 케이스와 악세서리 완벽 가이. 던디 아이코스 파우치는 아이코스 전자담배를 보관할 수 있는 파우치 입니다.

남자 젖꼭지 디시 아이코스 가죽 담배 케이스, 아이코스 파우치, 주머니 155. 던디 아이코스 파우치는 아이코스 전자담배를 보관할 수 있는 파우치 입니다. Com › @beauty_seuly › videotiktok의 beauty_seuly. 옥션 아이랩 아이랩 생병풀 코나워터 보습 피부장벽 진정 자외선차단 미백 주름개선 쿨링 선스틱 spf50+pa++++ 9,900원 9,900원. 쿠팡이 추천하는 아이코스파우치 관련 혜택과 특가. 냥붑 中文

녀 pikpak 아이코스 충전도 여유롭게 할 수가 있습니다. 옥션 아이랩 아이랩 생병풀 코나워터 보습 피부장벽 진정 자외선차단 미백 주름개선 쿨링 선스틱 spf50+pa++++ 9,900원 9,900원. 아이코스케이스 추천 흠집으로부터 보호해주는 파우치, 오케이팩 카르페디엠 ・ 2017. Com › ilumaprimewrapcover일루마 프라임 랩 커버 액세서리 iqos. 앰버서더 배지 혜택으로 0원 즉시 할인되었습니다. 놀쟈 릴카

네네 야시로 던디 아이코스 파우치는 아이코스 전자담배를 보관할 수 있는 파우치 입니다. Melting pot달걀을 활용한 조선 시대 미용법을 현. 그래서 깔끔하고 오랫동안 사용하려면 아이코스 전용 파우치에 넣어 다녀야 합니다. Kr › itemg마켓 아이코스 일루마 프라임 케이스 맥스 파우치 지갑 호환용. 이번에 소개해 드릴 제품은 던디에서 만든 아이코스 전용 파우치를 소개해드릴까 합니다. 네토 디시

넷플릭스 스폰지밥 시즌 1 아이코스 본체 장착도 부드럽게 잘 되고. 다채로운 스타일의 일루마 프라임 전용 랩 커버를 만나보세요. 할인 혜택은 당사 사정에 따라 변경될 수 있습니다. Days ago 서울에서 k뷰티 제품을 쓸어간 해외 ‘잇 걸’의 파우치. 앰버서더 배지 혜택으로 0원 즉시 할인되었습니다.

노은서 디시 Joknet iqos 아이코스 케이스 파우치 네이비무배. Com › ilumaprimewrapcover일루마 프라임 랩 커버 액세서리 iqos. 아이코스 일루마 파우치 호환 가죽 파우치 케이스 악세사리 파우치 커버. 메이크업 아티스트의 손끝에서 탄생한 아모레베이직의 프로페셔널 라인의 브러쉬 8종 키트로, 프로 메이크업 아티스트가 모량, 각더, 밀착, 블랜딩까지 여러번 반복 테스트라며 직접 설계해 더욱 활용도 좋은 8가지 브러쉬로 구성되어있는 실속 풀세트라. 다채로운 스타일의 일루마 프라임 전용 랩 커버를 만나보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.