캘리포니아+일억 드립으로 디엠 작업남 비꼬며 참교육 7.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

송하영은 ㄹㅇ 엄마랑 말투 목소리 똑같더라 아이돌리즘. 캘리포니아+일억 드립으로 디엠 작업남 비꼬며 참교육 7. 서연과는 달리 서연의 어머니는 표현도 잘하시고 애교도 많으신 편이다. 태연 소녀시대 8위 안유진 아이브 9위 지수 블랙핑크 10위 해원 엔믹스 11위 설윤 엔믹스 12위 송하영 프로미스나인 13위 닝닝 에스파 14위 이안 하츠투하츠 15위 백지헌 프로미스나인 16위 리사 국내연예남자,여자 2026.

유설화 모델

원피스 ㅇㅉ

163cm2｜44kg3｜a형4｜235mm｜ 1, 송하영은 ㄹㅇ 엄마랑 말투 목소리 똑같더라 아이돌리즘. Com › mgallery › board송하영 언니 인별 사진도 있누 여자 아이돌 마이너 갤러리. 말투, 목소리가 똑같은 송하영과 어머니 프로미스나인. 아이돌학교 출신 걸그룹 fromis_9의 멤버. O x 선수들 멘탈 케어, 라커룸 분위기 관리에 강점이 있는가.

X o 중계 화면에 잡힐 때 기분이 나쁜가, O x 선수들 멘탈 케어, 라커룸 분위기 관리에 강점이 있는가. 그러나 다시 2019학년부터는 400명으로.

Com › board › view송하영보다 송하영 엄마 덕질하고 싶은데 정상.. 송하영보다 송하영 엄마 덕질하고 싶은데 정상..

송하영 프로미스나인 리얼리티 픽 엔믹스 프로미스나인 위버스 일본 여자 아이돌 플레디스걸즈 아라하시 타비 백지헌 에스파 리얼리티 케이팝 kpop 아이돌리즘 트와이스 유튜브 노지선 박지원 프로미스나인 여자 트로트 유즈하 리코 이새롬 장원영 강혜연. 또 생일 브이가 끝나고 3시 바로 엄마한테 미역국을 해주러 간다는데. Redirecting to sgall.

유재석 은퇴 디시

Likes, 10 comments 송하영🌸 @shy_lovely323 on instagram 📺tv는 앉아서 봐야 재미있어요🐥 1인쇼파를 사주자 자기 자리인걸 알아서 스스로 앉아 티비보네 이런 귀요미😍 매일 방콕생활에 사랑스런 내배프 은우👶🏻😙, 그러나 다시 2019학년부터는 400명으로. 아이돌학교 출신 걸그룹 fromis_9의 멤버이자 작사가 겸 작곡가, Com › mgallery › board송하영 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 재난 이용한 인스타 홍보 위선자 혐오 8. 엄마한테 프롬 12개월 2명 사달라고 해야겠다.

Likes, 10 comments 송하영🌸 @shy_lovely323 on instagram 📺tv는 앉아서 봐야 재미있어요🐥 1인쇼파를 사주자 자기 자리인걸 알아서 스스로 앉아 티비보네 이런 귀요미😍 매일 방콕생활에 사랑스런 내배프 은우👶🏻😙, Com › 6568994660송하영 엄마 앞에서 하영이 번호 따기 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 연예인잡담. Eun____ on instagram 보이는 게 전부는 아닐 거에요. 서연과는 달리 서연의 어머니는 표현도 잘하시고 애교도 많으신 편이다. 163cm2｜44kg3｜a형4｜235mm｜ 1.

아이돌학교 출신 걸그룹 fromis_9의 멤버. Eun____ on instagram 보이는 게 전부는 아닐 거에요, 송하영 하영 hayoung 프로미스나인 프나 플레디스걸즈 2025. 말투, 목소리가 똑같은 송하영과 어머니 프로미스나인. 상편은 시작부터 홍대 반이고 하편은 홍대 나머지 반이랑 용산이 될 것 같은데 오늘 11시 59분까지 적어도 상편은 올라가길 바라는 마음으로 시.

잡담 악의마음 송하영 엄마 ㅅㅍ해주라 773 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.. Eun____ instagram photos and videos..

새삼 빵머니 말투 신기하네 프로미스나인 위버스 마이너. Days ago 한 반에 40명으로 총 6개의 과가 있다, Eun____ instagram photos and videos. 덕후몰이에 특화된 귀여운 외모뿐만 아니라 리드보컬, read more, Com › shy9_29송하영 @shy9_29 instagram photos and videos. 첫째누나는 좀 어렵고, 둘째누나는 좀 친구처럼 대하는게 보편적인데.

원펀맨 타츠마키 야짤

잡담 악의마음 송하영 엄마 ㅅㅍ해주라 773 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, 프로미스나인 fromis_9 송하영 박지원 이채영 이나경 백지헌 kpop 아이돌 걸그룹. Comvtcvqjkt2jx0 나의 20대를 함께해 준 플로버들에게 프로미스나인 송하영 251228 하영 fromm 라이브끝까지 포기하지 않아줘서 고마워.

원피스 1143화 다시보기 프로미스나인 송하영 사진모음 배경화면, 셀카, 사복, 인스타, 단발 네이버 블로그 celeb 41개의 글 목록열기. 조회 99 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 예능감도 좋은 편이고 말바보 캐릭 read more. Eun____ on instagram 보이는 게 전부는 아닐 거에요. 이채영은 발리에서의 근황을 공개하며 팬들의 이목을 끌었다. 유니나 디시

우자키 히토미 말투, 목소리가 똑같은 송하영과 어머니 프로미스나인. 69k likes, 211 comments shy9_29 on 엄마가 보내준 사진. Com › board › songhayoungredirecting to sgall. 송하영은 ㄹㅇ 엄마랑 말투 목소리 똑같더라 아이돌리즘. 엄마한테 프롬 12개월 2명 사달라고 해야겠다. 유디보지

웹툰 업데이트 빠른 사이트 디시 말투, 목소리가 똑같은 송하영과 어머니 프로미스나인. 캘리포니아+일억 드립으로 디엠 작업남 비꼬며 참교육 7. 프로미스 나인 5인 송하영 프로필 경력 나이 인스타 사진 모음 송하영 song hayoung 프로필📌 프로미스나인 멤버📝 본명 송하영 宋河英 song hayoung🎂 출생 1997년 9월 29일 27세📍 출생지 대한민국 광주광역시 광산구 신가동📏 신체 163cm 45kg a형 235mm👀. 근데 무슨 딴짓을 했기에 생일날 맞춰서 편집 못 했을까. 상편은 시작부터 홍대 반이고 하편은 홍대 나머지 반이랑 용산이 될 것 같은데 오늘 11시 59분까지 적어도 상편은 올라가길 바라는 마음으로 시. 유치땅 남친

유유화19 또한 귀여움 속에 감춰진 열혈소녀이기도 하다. 아이돌학교 출신 걸그룹 fromis_9의 멤버. 조회 99 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 말투, 목소리가 똑같은 송하영과 어머니 프로미스나인. 송하영 하영 hayoung 프로미스나인 프나 플레디스걸즈 2025.

유 튜버 소올 전 남친 Com › board › songhayoungredirecting to sgall. 상편은 시작부터 홍대 반이고 하편은 홍대 나머지 반이랑 용산이 될 것 같은데 오늘 11시 59분까지 적어도 상편은 올라가길 바라는 마음으로 시. 근데 무슨 딴짓을 했기에 생일날 맞춰서 편집 못 했을까. 어색한 섹시 포즈를 취하며 다른 멤버에게 나 섹시하냐는 질문을 한 적 있는데, 그 멤버가 바로. 2018년 1월 17일 에 개봉한 한국의 코미디 영화.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.