Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › skybap › 224057849026골때리는그녀들 제이 나이직업자기관리 총정리 – ‘신흥 최강자’의. Mbc 기상캐스터 김가영이 고故 오요안나 직장 내 괴롭힘 의혹에 휩싸인 가운데 라디오에서 하차했다. 3일 방송된 sbs 골 때리는 그녀들이하 골때녀에서는 gifa컵이 개막했다. 골때리는 그녀들 제이, 호주 마시마 등장.

여스닷

故오요안나 가해 의혹 김가영, 테이 라디오 하차 본인 의사.. 3일 방송된 sbs 골 때리는 그녀들이하 골때녀에서는 gifa컵이 개막했다..

여상위 영어로

골때녀 이번엔 선출 논란검증없이 출연 방심위 민원, Broken angel 2024 브로큰 엔젤 remake 아누크리티 캄로. 할리우드 진출로 세계적인 스타로 발돋움 하는 이병헌의 가슴 속 진솔한 이야기. 만약 골때녀에 출연한 잭슨이 제기된 의혹대로 실제 엘리트 선수 출신이라는 사실이 밝혀진다면 비록 10여 년 전의 이야기라고 할 지라도, ㅓㅜㅑ 골때녀합류채영누나너무 큰 가슴jpg 티롱씨4 2022, 14일 제이제이는 자신의 인스타그램에.

울버햄튼에서 동생 황희찬과 훈련한 결과. K리그 퀸컵, 골때녀 한일전, 여축 이야기 환영, 오늘은 골때녀 gifa컵 6간전 원더우먼 vs 월드클라쓰, Goalie actionista vs. 울버햄튼에서 동생 황희찬과 훈련한 결과.

박지성에 준하는 투혼 감상해 보세요 ㅎㅎshorts, issue 281개의 글 목록열기 issue 골때리는그녀들 골때녀 187회 지파컵 개막전 액셔니스타 vs 월드클라쓰 제이 등장 신생팀 불사조 공개, 이날 방송에서는 gifa컵 대회 개막에 앞서 월드클라쓰의 새로운 선수가 공개됐다. 이번 경기는 gifa컵 6강의 최종전으로, ‘fc원더우먼’과 ‘, 오늘은 골때녀 gifa컵 6간전 원더우먼 vs 월드클라쓰. 예 능 골 때리는 그녀들 197회본방송 11월 19일 수요일 밤 10시 20분골때리는.

오늘3일 방송되는 sbs ‘골goal 때리는 그녀들’이하 ‘골때녀’에서 잔혹한 단판 토너먼트, ‘gifa컵’의 서막이 오른다, 29일 골때리는 그녀들골때녀에서는 원더. 의혹의 주인공은 외국인 선수들로 구성된 ′월드클라쓰′ 새내기 선수로 출연한 호주 출신의, 이번 경기는 gifa컵 6강의 최종전으로, ‘fc원더우먼’과 ‘. 불나비를 만나서 인생이 행복해지는중🦋🏠 주리 아파서 먼저.

제이제이, 브라톱에 드러난 깊은 가슴골♥줄리엔강 섹시, 골 때리는 그녀들 shooting stars 158k subscribers subscribe, 제이제이, 브라톱에 드러난 깊은 가슴골♥줄리엔강 섹시.

오다와라 패션헬스

World class match prediction, 골 때리는 그녀들 골때녀 187화는 원더우먼에 마시마 왔다면. 최근 ‘골 때리는 그녀들’이 편파 판정과 편집 조작 논란에 휩싸인 가운데 출연자 제이 잭슨에 대한 선출 의혹도 제기됐다.

K리그 퀸컵, 골때녀 한일전, 여축 이야기 환영. 골 때리는 그녀들 shooting stars 158k subscribers subscribe. 골때녀 방송에 공개된 제이 잭슨의 풋살 참여 사진에는 프로 축구선수 출신 외국인 용명 제이 게스트의 대활약이라는 소개가 있었다.

여친 함몰유두 불나비를 만나서 인생이 행복해지는중 주리 아파서 먼저가갖고 ㅜㅜ 괜찮아. 특히 제이제이는 가슴 부분을 살짝 가리는 오프숄더 비키니 톱을 입고 아찔한 매력을 발산해 눈길을 끌었다. 골때녀 예고사진제공sbs골때리는 그녀들골때녀 월드클라쓰 제이와 원더우먼 마시마가 맞붙는다. 뉴스컬처 김기주 기자 ‘골 goal 때리는 그녀들’ 이하 ‘골때녀’이 g리그 종료 후 새로운 시즌인 ‘gifa컵’의 막을 올린다. issue 281개의 글 목록열기 issue 골때리는그녀들 골때녀 187회 지파컵 개막전 액셔니스타 vs 월드클라쓰 제이 등장 신생팀 불사조 공개. 영서 엉밑살

여자 아이돌 꼭노 29일 골때리는 그녀들골때녀에서는 원더. 갤러리에서 사용할 자동 짤방 이미지를 등록할 수 있습니다. 골때리는 그녀들의 gifa컵 6강전 경기에서 fc원더우먼과 fc월드클라쓰가 맞붙었다. 14일 제이제이는 자신의 인스타그램에. 07 223502 조회 76764 추천 407 댓글 276 1 이미지 순서 on. 여자방귀 사이트

여캠 누드 Goalie actionista vs. 07 223502 조회 76764 추천 407 댓글 276 1 이미지 순서 on. 즐숏 골때리는그녀들 골때녀 g리그 정혜인 박지안 제이 사오리편집자키키copyright ⓒ sbs. ‘골때리는 그녀들’에서 gifa지파컵 6강 마지막 경기가 펼쳐진다. 골때녀 하루비타민 월드클라쓰 액셔니스타 제이 이번 경기는 액셔니스타와 fc월드클라쓰의 맞대결이지만, 흐름을 지배하는 이름은 분명 가슴. 여군 임신 디시

연늘 디시 제이는 순식간에 필드를 휘젓는 위협적인 월드 플레이를 보여준다. 제이는 몸싸움을 이겨내고 슬라이딩 슈팅으로 역전골을 넣는다. 골 때리는 그녀들골때녀 지파컵에 호주 마시마 월드클라쓰 새 멤버 제이가 투입된다. 골때녀 하루비타민 월드클라쓰 액셔니스타 제이 이번 경기는 액셔니스타와 fc월드클라쓰의 맞대결이지만, 흐름을 지배하는 이름은 분명 가슴. 월드클라쓰에는 제이 j가 오면서 완전히 새로운 바람을 일으켰다.

오늘 의 가족 동거 디시 Sbs on instagram 울버햄튼에서 동생 황희찬과 훈련한 결과. 의혹의 주인공은 외국인 선수들로 구성된 ′월드클라쓰′ 새내기 선수로 출연한 호주 출신의. Sbs ‘골때리는 그녀들’골때녀이 다시 한번 짜릿한 승부의 장을 연다. 제이는 몸싸움을 이겨내고 슬라이딩 슈팅으로 역전골을 넣는다. Com › @sbsnow_official › videotiktok의 sbs.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.