Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › success_young › 223276649055대학생 사회 초년생 20대 재테크 노하우 10가지 공부 방법 알아보기. 무조건 높은 수익을 좇기보다는, 안정적으로 성장할 수 있는 투자법을 찾는 게 중요해요. 필요하신 분들은 한 번 신청해보셔도 좋을 듯 합니다. 처음부터 막막한 사회 초년생의 자산 포트폴리오 구성을 도와줄 수 있는 서비스를 소개 드릴게요.

Sheri 트위터

Seo-104 야동

사회적으로 양극화와 빈부격차가 심해지면서 개천에서 용 나는 케이스가 점점 희박해지고 있는 것이 현실입니다.. Splg qqqm s&p500, 나스닥 지수추종 spy voo ivv qqq등 메이저 etf들이 있으나 비교적 저렴한 수수료, 낮은 주가로 장기간 분할매수 하기에 더 적합하다 생각하여 골랐습니다..

Retsu Dao X

항상 빠르게 피드백 주셔서 덕분에 행사도 잘. Xlre 맥쿼리인프라 schd에 리츠가 없어서. 무조건 높은 수익을 좇기보다는, 안정적으로 성장할 수 있는 투자법을 찾는 게 중요해요. 사회초년생 포트폴리오 평가 부탁드립니다 자산 배분. 미래에셋 네이버cma 통장 11,252,496원 2.

Retsu Dao Missav

11k views 3 years ago. url 복사 이웃추가 올 초부터 사회초년생의 자산포트폴리오를 계속 업데이트 해나가고 있다 내가 노동을 하지 않아도 들어오는 현금흐름의 원천을 생각해보게 되며, 내게 돈의 흐름의 대한 가치가 정말 많이 바뀌었다, 실제로 제가 익혀서 적용한 방법이니 도움이 될 것입니다. Com › 1972025 최신 사회초년생 500만원 투자, 어디에 해야 할까. 사회초년생 포트폴리오 평가 부탁드립니다 자산 배분. 따라서 본인이 원하는 주식과 채권의 비중을 유지하기 위해서는 주기적으로 포트폴리오 비중을 확인하고 적합한 상품으로 갈아타는 작업을 해주는 것이 필요하다는 사실 정도는 기억하자.

Retsuo Dao

필요하신 분들은 한 번 신청해보셔도 좋을 듯 합니다. 무조건 높은 수익을 좇기보다는, 안정적으로 성장할 수 있는 투자법을 찾는 게 중요해요, 사회초년생 투자입문 09 사회초년생을 위한 포트폴리오.

simpcityとは 현재는 월급이 들어오면 연금계좌에 10만원씩 납입중이기에, 본인은 위에 소개한 etf를 두달에 한번씩 적립식으로 매수하고자 한다. 사회초년생 맞춤 포트폴리오 구성법 – 신입도 합격 스토리 만들기. 사회초년생 포트폴리오 신혼부부 포트폴리오 내 아이 포트폴리오 새우튀김 50분 전 january 20th, 2026 personal record it is best to regularly record for posterity. 65세, 은퇴생활자인 작은 누님을 위한 포트폴리오. 월급의 상당부분 적립식으로 올웨더 포트폴리오 구성하여 투자하고 있습니다. sgki-041

sini_1219 nude 사회적으로 양극화와 빈부격차가 심해지면서 개천에서 용 나는 케이스가 점점 희박해지고 있는 것이 현실입니다. 평범한 월 200 사회초년생 자산 분배방식으로 봐주시면 됩니다. 처음부터 막막한 사회 초년생의 자산 포트폴리오 구성을 도와줄 수 있는 서비스를 소개 드릴게요. 계약연봉에서 지출금 빼면 예상투자 금액은 월250300만원 정도입니다. 25세, 사회 초년생인 우리 아이를 위한 포트폴리오. sex korean

s2_u.l fantrie Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. ◐ 장기적 우상향 자산 주식이나 채권처럼 장기적으로 내재가치가 성장하는 자산을 중심으로 포트폴리오를 구성한다. 디시더쿠 유저들의 실제 성공 사례와 현실적인 저축투자 노하우를 총정리했습니다. 간단하게 매월 들어오는 수입의 배분현금. 사회초년생 포트폴리오의 정답은 아니고 참고만 부탁드립니다. rurutan leak video

shaun fantrie Com › entry › 사회초년생사회초년생 포트폴리오, 이렇게 준비하면 채용 담당자 반응이 달라집. Schd jepi 대표적인 배당성장주인 schd와 월배당 현금흐름을 위해 jepi를 넣었습니다. url 복사 이웃추가 올 초부터 사회초년생의 자산포트폴리오를 계속 업데이트 해나가고 있다 내가 노동을 하지 않아도 들어오는 현금흐름의 원천을 생각해보게 되며, 내게 돈의 흐름의 대한 가치가 정말 많이 바뀌었다. 26년에는 정신차리고 공부해서 포트폴리오 짜봤는데 평가좀. 평범한 월 200 사회초년생 자산 분배방식으로 봐주시면 됩니다.

shemale pikpak 사회초년생 mz세대, 월 50만 원으로 만드는 고배당 etf 포트폴리오 네이버 블로그. 모델 포트폴리오 25세, 사회 초년생인 우리 아이를 위한 포트폴리오. 디시더쿠 유저들의 실제 성공 사례와 현실적인 저축투자 노하우를 총정리했습니다. 사회초년생 재테크 추천, 재테크 포트폴리오 알아보기 목차 1. 일반 0원에서 시작한 사회초년생 1년간 저축 자산 포트폴리오 평가부탁드려요 자갤러118.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.