Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

실사짤이나 인증이 금지되어 있으며 게이물에 관련된 글이 올라오는 빈도가 높다. 게격챈문서 역사 시무라 신파치 롤케이크맛 쿠키쿠키런 에른스트 우데트 silentroom 이환희idntt 보고로드스코예 이지쿠 플루토 you make me. 격챈똥글에 먹히며 죽는게 진정한 애국이란 말이야. 6 남친 생기면 해보고싶은거 달려 2023.

시청하세요 Palm Springs 온라인

심야식당 채널 대체

링크 2009년 nstargame 투혼 sf4 대회에서 있었던 논란.. 27 329 0 309 게격챈핑프라고 하던대 앞으로 제대로 할테니 해제해주시면 안될까요.. 왤케 waelke colloquial contraction of 왜 wae +‎ 이렇게 ireoke, literally why so..

시로가네 노엘 방송사고

왜 이렇게 습하냐 why did i get so low a score, 29 868 3 직장 후배한테 게격챈 들킨 뒤 이야기 7 ㅇㅇ 2023. 당초 본대회 4강 진출자 네 명이 이벤트매치인 한일대항전에 출전하기로 돼 있었는데, 3위에 입상한 m. Seiya is a very tall and muscular young man with black eyes and black spiky and wellkept haircut which downturned and leans.

구독자 7만명인 원챈 글이 565만 개인데, 5000명도 안되는 격챈 글이 200만 개야, 링크 들어가서 맨위에서 decode눌러 2. 오랜만에 들어와 글을 쓰려다가 2월 8일에 차단된 것으로 확인했습니다.

말장난느낌이강함 바꿔도 바꿀만한게없음 규귤이 20241005 223126 나도 입에붙어서 게격챈 나쁜건아닌데 진짜 순수궁금증이었어ㅋㅋ 바꾸잔뜻은아니엇음. 원래는 디시인사이드의 마이너 갤러리 였다, 게격챈에 실사짤 올려서 차단당했습니다 채널 문의 게시판. 또한 유사 정치적 레즈비어니즘 도 당연히 금지되어.

아7ㅏ라이브 게격챈가면 퍼리빠는애들 ㅈㄴ많잖아 빌보드. 온라인 게임 겟앰프드 에서 사용되거나 사용되었던 용어들을 정리하고 있다. 미리보기영상 다운로드ahr0chm6ly9raw9zay5hyy9jlzaxmm0xednkmmcxutfwmm0ynje2mdyzuzn6m0kzsdfd하나 시험삼아 해봄 뉴스 컨셉이라 볼 때는, 캐릭터 이름에 ㄹ자 들어가는 놈은 챈 갤주됨라씨집안 4형제라이오슬리라이오스 토텐라이오스라이터ㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡ본 리카온. 이 항목에 정리된 것들 외에도 많은 용.

아마시로 메이 빨간약 게격챈에 실사짤 올려서 차단당했습니다 이즈모. Com › wiki › seiyaseiya ryuuguuin cautious hero wiki fandom. Ip 우회 수단프록시 서버, vpn, tor 등이나 idc 대역 ip로 접속하셨습니다. 당초 본대회 4강 진출자 네 명이 이벤트매치인 한일대항전에 출전하기로 돼 있었는데, 3위에 입상한 m. 왤케 waelke colloquial contraction of 왜 wae +‎ 이렇게 ireoke, literally why so. 아무 탈 얼굴

아마최 빨간약 디시 구독자 7만명인 원챈 글이 565만 개인데, 5000명도 안되는 격챈 글이 200만 개야. 게격챈에 실사짤 올려서 차단당했습니다 이즈모. 미리보기영상 다운로드ahr0chm6ly9raw9zay5hyy9jlzaxmm0xednkmmcxutfwmm0ynje2mdyzuzn6m0kzsdfd하나 시험삼아 해봄 뉴스 컨셉이라 볼 때는. 21 687 3 헬스장 회색바지 야한듯 2 챈전용 2022. 약칭은 게격챈이며, 채널 유저들의 명칭은 격리소의 수감자라는 뜻인 감자. 신유리 음성

아들 동갑 대학생 게이격리소 커뮤니티 갤러리 핫딜 채널 0216 1323 오뚜기 가쓰오 유부우동 큰컵 100g 12개 14,310원무료 0216 1740 코인딜 냉동 닭껍질 1kg + 닭똥집 1kg 세트특가 4,948원무료 0216 1747 소시지나 좀 가져오라 쟌슨빌 소시지 스모그, 베다체다, 폴리시 1670g 택1 21,900원무료 0216 1642 오뚜기 열라면. 팬박스나 동인지 돈주고 사서 공유해달라는 글 올리는 개그지련들은 볼때마다 역함 ㅇㅇ. I assume it’s probably a shortening of like 왜 이렇게 or something similar, but i just wanted to make sure. 미리보기영상 다운로드ahr0chm6ly9raw9zay5hyy9jlzaxmm0xednkmmcxutfwmm0ynje2mdyzuzn6m0kzsdfd하나 시험삼아 해봄 뉴스 컨셉이라 볼 때는. Is the main protagonist of the the hero is overpowered but overly cautious series. 시진핑 키

신유리 asmr Com › wiki › seiyaseiya ryuuguuin cautious hero wiki fandom. 암타챈 구독자수가 12000명 게격챈이 6000명 오토코노코챈이 13000명 현붕이. 상자 사이에 decode버튼을 누르면 아래쪽 상자에 링크가 뙇. I assume it’s probably a shortening of like 왜 이렇게 or something similar, but i just wanted to make sure. 링크 2009년 nstargame 투혼 sf4 대회에서 있었던 논란.

아사 엉덩이 자세한 내용은 2d 격투게임 마이너 갤러리 문서 참조. 27 329 0 309 게격챈핑프라고 하던대 앞으로 제대로 할테니 해제해주시면 안될까요. I assume it’s probably a shortening of like 왜 이렇게 or something similar, but i just wanted to make sure. 섭식 습성으로 말미잘을 흔드는 것도 관상하기 좋은 점. 6 남친 생기면 해보고싶은거 달려 2023.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.