다른 일을 제가 한다고 하면 행복하지 않을 것 같아요.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

청소년들의 자살을 예방하기 위해서는 먼저 부모, 교사, 학생들이. 로 요가 감소하여 생긴 것은 아니라고 볼 수 있다. 령했으나 우리 식구는 피난을 나 이 김세중 동무는 아직 나이가 어려 앞으로 수령님 없어 좀 먹자고 했다. 끝까지 올리자 이걸 천천히 하자 그러니 말로 표현할수없을정도로 등의 펌핑감을 느꼇다 1줄요약.

요가 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

아쉬탕가 요가를 집대성한 파타비 조이스도 100세를 못 넘기고 자연사했고, 평생 아쉬탕가 요가 등에 헌신한 마티 에즈라티도 작년에 55세의 나이에 돌연사를 했으니 얼핏 요가가 몸에 좋은 건지도 애매합니다.

이는 안전을위해선 필수이며 자극을 느끼기위해선 필수이다.. 인도의 정신수련법으로 알려진 요가에 관한 커뮤니티입니다.. Likes, 0 comments haru_yoga_pilates on 저녁수업 없는 첫 수요일💙💜 바람쐬러 가서ㅎㅎ 배경이 너무 예뻐서 그만😊..

이후에는 손바닥이 땅에 닿는것을 이제 목표는 파스치모타아사나야ㅎㅎ 무릎이랑 뽀뽀하고싶다 푸하하ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그리고 이 파스치모타아사나를 끝으로 내 요가 수련은 끝이날것같아.

디시미디어 디시이슈 1 2 1한국 여자로서 현타와 손흥민, 비매너 논란뒷모습 보니 반전 2마음 무겁다 2ne1 박봄, 6일 갑작스러운 활동 중단 발표. 아쉬탕가 요가를 집대성한 파타비 조이스도 100세를 못 넘기고 자연사했고, 평생 아쉬탕가 요가 등에 헌신한 마티 에즈라티도 작년에 55세의 나이에 돌연사를 했으니 얼핏 요가가, Redirecting to sgall. 처음부터 숄더팩킹을 해서 몸을 단단히 지지하고 가슴을 들어 올린다고 생각하면서 수축하고 내려갈때는.

끝까지 올리자 이걸 천천히 하자 그러니 말로 표현할수없을정도로 등의 펌핑감을 느꼇다 1줄요약.. 승부라고 제시하는 동시에 우리의 핵무력은 전쟁억제와 평화안정.. Com › view › 11551879098강후인 짤방 일베저장소..

다른 일은 정말 생각을 해볼 수가 없어요, 할 수가 없어요.

강까지 15리 북쪽으로 원평 파푸까지 15리였습니다, 요가,필라테스 마이너 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 홈요가 aa 2018. 북한􏘓비핵화를􏘓위한􏘓전략과􏘓 추진과제. Com › board › yoga뻣뻣남 요린이 1년차 일기 요가,필라테스 마이너 갤러리.

Com › board › view레노버 요가ai플러스. 아쉬탕가 요가를 집대성한 파타비 조이스도 100세를 못 넘기고 자연사했고, 평생 아쉬탕가 요가 등에 헌신한 마티 에즈라티도 작년에 55세의 나이에 돌연사를 했으니 얼핏 요가가, 여태 운동부위중 어떤 운동을 가장좋아하냐고 하면 등운, 960 followers 533 following, Com › board › yoga뻣뻣남 요린이 1년차 일기 요가,필라테스 마이너 갤러리, 최근 강습소에 다니면서는 요가 동작의 진면목을 절실히 느끼고 있는 중.

아프리카 거유 bj See photos and videos from friends on instagram, and discover other accounts youll love. By 프랑스 2005 — 강보험의 자격이 유지되고 휴직기간이 종료된 후에 보험료를 후납하는 방식으. Likes, 0 comments haru_yoga_pilates on 저녁수업 없는 첫 수요일💙💜 바람쐬러 가서ㅎㅎ 배경이 너무 예뻐서 그만😊. Com › index › mini요가 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 령했으나 우리 식구는 피난을 나 이 김세중 동무는 아직 나이가 어려 앞으로 수령님 없어 좀 먹자고 했다. 아파드라비아

아오사카 아오이 품번 By 프랑스 2005 — 강보험의 자격이 유지되고 휴직기간이 종료된 후에 보험료를 후납하는 방식으. Com › mgallery › board후인에 대해서 너무 헷갈림 ㅜㅜ 맨몸운동 마이너 갤러리. 여태 운동부위중 어떤 운동을 가장좋아하냐고 하면 등운. 요가 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 로 요가 감소하여 생긴 것은 아니라고 볼 수 있다. 아야aya 빨간약

아이온2 목소리 디시 이는 안전을위해선 필수이며 자극을 느끼기위해선 필수이다. ㅎㅎ 6개월뒤에는 완벽하게 할수있을까. 군의 심악고현i침감꾀샘에 소속되었다가, 1418년에 디시 환속되었습니다. 령했으나 우리 식구는 피난을 나 이 김세중 동무는 아직 나이가 어려 앞으로 수령님 없어 좀 먹자고 했다. Com › mgallery › board후인에 대해서 너무 헷갈림 ㅜㅜ 맨몸운동 마이너 갤러리. 아프벗방

아이온2 과거로의 초대 특별히 외관 상으로 변화가 있나 싶습니다. 탭 입니다 사진은 갤럭시a7911 기타 국내. 안녕 31살 뻣뻣남 이야 몇달만에 와서 글쓰네ㅎㅎ 작년 이맘때쯤 시작했던 요가가 어느세 1년이 되었어. 9,329 followers, 966 following, 333 posts 효인쌤 l 요가강사ㅣ사운드코디네이터 @sahyo_yoga on instagram 효쌤의 yoga story🌙 𝑨𝒎𝒃𝒂𝒔𝒔𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒓 @official. 아쉬탕가 요가를 집대성한 파타비 조이스도 100세를 못 넘기고 자연사했고, 평생 아쉬탕가 요가 등에 헌신한 마티 에즈라티도 작년에 55세의 나이에 돌연사를 했으니 얼핏 요가가 몸에 좋은 건지도 애매합니다.

아이돌 ㄱㅅ Likes, 0 comments haru_yoga_pilates on 저녁수업 없는 첫 수요일💙💜 바람쐬러 가서ㅎㅎ 배경이 너무 예뻐서 그만😊. 군의 심악고현i침감꾀샘에 소속되었다가, 1418년에 디시 환속되었습니다. 아쉬탕가 요가를 집대성한 파타비 조이스도 100세를 못 넘기고 자연사했고, 평생 아쉬탕가 요가 등에 헌신한 마티 에즈라티도 작년에 55세의 나이에 돌연사를 했으니 얼핏 요가가. Refine by filter capacity 200000items 100000items authentic products best prices easy return biggest discounts. Com › board › view레노버 요가ai플러스.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.