국내정치굥147 유퀴즈 출연에 대한 더쿠 반응.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

현재 경희대학교 연극영화학과 2학년에 재학 중입니다. 저 자막다는 사람 담주 유퀴즈 나온다syoutu. Jpg 71,084 560 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 26 2248 친구에서 부부로 함께 지낸 세월만 11년이 넘는 찐친같은 신혼부부 영상링크 ↓ syoutu.

X 63,848 275 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

Jpg 71,084 560 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.. 연봉 100배 스카우트 거절ebs 1타 강사, 교실에 남은 이유..

Jpg 6,005 10 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

무명의 더쿠 20260126 113033 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다.

5 때문에 이 가수의 명곡인 step by step 이 배경음악으로 자주 쓰인다, 배우 김수현이 오랜만에 예능 나들이에 나선다. 26 2248 친구에서 부부로 함께 지낸 세월만 11년이 넘는 찐친같은 신혼부부 영상링크 ↓ syoutu, Net › square › 3588490037더쿠 꽤 많은 시청자들이 그리워하는 유퀴즈 초기 방송 컨셉, ㅣ구독자 5만 기념 q&a라는 제목의 영상을 공개했다.

Net › square › 4076765221더쿠 추성훈, 허경환 ‘유퀴즈’ mc 합류 오해하고 실수 괜히 설레게, 현재 경희대학교 연극영화학과 2학년에 재학 중입니다, 윤 당선인은 지난 20일 방송된 tvn 유퀴즈에 출연했다.

Days Ago 케이돌토크 잡담 유퀴즈에 K리그 2부 선수들 나온적 있는데 41 0 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

ㅣ구독자 5만 기념 q&a라는 제목의 영상을 공개했다, 지드래곤이 출연하는 ‘유퀴즈’는 10월 중 방송된다. 조세호, 유퀴즈 굴욕 계속고정→하차 후 어깨 끝자락만 겨우 포착 하락1.

당신을 인터뷰합니다 유퀴즈 부럽지 않은 내 매력을 끄집어내는 인터뷰 시즌 8.. Jpg 8,186 43 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo..

이슈 유퀴즈 이 감성이 좋았던 사람들도 많음 72,470 387 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

이에 대해 허경환은 mbc 놀면 뭐하니, Cha eunwoos you quiz on the block comment, 유머 유퀴즈 페이커 저를 이루고 있는 여러분들 덕분에 54,119 295, 이슈 유퀴즈 수능 출제위원이 이야기하는 감금 비하인드. 이슈 다음주 송혜교 예고 62,975 289.

트위터 목까시 야동 21 1543 지금은 너무 셀럽들 불러내서 칭찬일색에 재미가 없어 셀럽의 성공일화보다 소소한 동네 사람들 얘기가 더 좋았음 목록 스크랩 0. 13조회수17,542 목록 댓글 108 글자크기 작게가 글자크기 크게가. Day ago 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. 윤혜정은 2004년부터 공립학교 국어. 연봉 100배 스카우트 거절ebs 1타 강사, 교실에 남은 이유. 트위터 염탐 더쿠

트위터 신상상납 이슈 어떤 인생을 살았어도 결국 유퀴즈 나왔을거라는 차은우ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 배우 김수현이 오랜만에 예능 나들이에 나선다. X 63,848 275 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 인 푸드 인플루언서가 다녀간 자리 19. Days ago 케이돌토크 잡담 유퀴즈에 k리그 2부 선수들 나온적 있는데 41 0 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 트위터 영상저장하자

트위터동영상저장실시간랭킹 Jpg 6,005 10 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 윤혜정은 2004년부터 공립학교 국어. 난 예전건 잘 안봤고 바뀐걸 더 보긴함. 누군가가 유퀴즈 나가면 유재석과 허경환이 둘이서 mc를 볼 거라고 하더라. 43,092 231 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 트위터 애널 야동

트위터 움짤 용량 04 1421 추영우 한예종 학생들 인터뷰할 때 나옴 추영우치면 나오고 싶은 연관단어들말한 거 지금 옥씨부인전 출연 중. 이제 ai 퀴즈로 기사의 핵심 내용을 점검해보세요. Net › square › 4073851316더쿠 유퀴즈 책상 부순 추성훈. 228k followers, 9 following, 2,939 posts see instagram photos and videos from 유 퀴즈 온 더 블럭 @youquizontheblock. 이슈 다음주 송혜교 예고 62,975 289.

트위터 펨돔 풋잡 이에 대해 허경환은 mbc 놀면 뭐하니. 컴백과 함께 첫 예능으로 ‘유퀴즈’를 선택한 지드래곤은 특유의 솔직한 언변으로 다양한 이야기를 전했다고 알려져 본방송에 대한 기대가 더욱 커진다. 당신을 인터뷰합니다 유퀴즈 부럽지 않은 내 매력을 끄집어내는 인터뷰 시즌 8. X 63,848 275 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 이슈 유퀴즈 여자는 살림하다 초등학교만 졸업하고 시집가면 된다를 들으며 살아오다 무작정 미국으로 이민을 떠난 여성.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.