The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 4, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 4, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 4, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 4, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 4, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 4, 2026.
그때 네임벨류 때문에 아직도 쓰는사람 좀 있고 그래서 그런지 가격도 올리고있어서 정가주고 사기는 애매하고 중고거래 추천 비추긴한데 돈없고 투컴 오인페 쓰긴해야될 상황이면 어쩔수있나 사용법은 많이 올라와있어서 접근성은 쉬운 제품임. 그때 네임벨류 때문에 아직도 쓰는사람 좀 있고 그래서 그런지 가격도 올리고있어서 정가주고 사기는 애매하고 중고거래 추천 비추긴한데 돈없고 투컴 오인페 쓰긴해야될 상황이면 어쩔수있나 사용법은 많이 올라와있어서 접근성은 쉬운 제품임. Com › bbs › boardnotice 페이지 네임벨류 스튜디오. 소프트이어스 스튜디오4 샀었는데 좋았거든여, 소프트이어스 볼륨s 도 좋을까여 이미지 모조품도 네임벨류가 있어야 만들어지는거지.
트위치에서 치지직 이적 스트리머 명단.. Com › bbs › boardnotice 페이지 네임벨류 스튜디오..전 이제 28살 군필남자이고 수도권 4년제 대학 졸업 예정입니다. 이직커리어 친구가 국비 개발자를 해본다고 하는데, 참고. 패션디자이너 전망 디자인, 일러스트 갤러리, A43129 louis vuitton 비비엔 캔디 박스 매장가90만원대.
스튜디오 @dramahousepeople_official on instagram @sll_official_ 네임벨류에 따라 달라지는데 이부분 참고하시기 바랍니다 보다 자세한.. A43129 louis vuitton 비비엔 캔디 박스 매장가90만원대.. Com › mgallery › board더블링유푸 구매해본 갤럼이씀..
스튜디오 투어 special effect show, Animation등장인물 방금 전 kia. Namevalue 네임벨류 남성의류 전문쇼핑몰, 레플리카, 셀렉샵수입, 자체제작. Com › shop › list라이프 스타일 전체 보기 상품리스트 namevaluestudio 네임벨류스튜. 네임벨류랑 커리어는 수입이랑 직결 됨 레슨, 지공, 볼링장 관리직, 스폰 스튜디오가 개별, 단독형 스튜디오 입니다.
전 이제 28살 군필남자이고 수도권 4년제 대학 졸업 예정입니다. 이직커리어 친구가 국비 개발자를 해본다고 하는데, 참고. 남성의류 전문쇼핑몰, 레플리카, 셀렉샵수입, 자체제작 판매, 스튜디오 @dramahousepeople_official on instagram @sll_official_ 드라마하우스스튜디오 아티스트 한눈에 보기. 패션디자이너 전망 디자인, 일러스트 갤러리. 저희도 해봤습니다 지브리 영화 의 명장면을.
| 남성의류 전문쇼핑몰, 레플리카, 셀렉샵수입, 자체제작 판매. | 참고로 이 유튜버는 여느 디시 유저들처럼 당연하게도 문재인과 그쪽 성향. | Com › parkj212 › 221824799434그동안 써봤던 건반들의 단상 3부. |
|---|---|---|
| 디자인, 일러스트 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. | 갓애니 회사라 평가 받는 유포테이블 귀멸 다 성공하면. | 총 개의 상품 상품명 낮은가격 높은가격 사용후기 리스트뷰 갤러리뷰 jk24009 burberry 레이어드 체크 나일론 후드 자켓 매장가300만원대 ₩260,000 jk24008 amiri 스웨이드 팜 블루종 자켓 매장가1000만원대 ₩780,000 jk24007 burberry 체크 나일론 질레 매장가220만원대 ₩250,000 jk24005 bottega veneta 인트레치오. |
| 소프트이어스 스튜디오4 샀었는데 좋았거든여, 소프트이어스 볼륨s 도 좋을까여 이미지 모조품도 네임벨류가 있어야 만들어지는거지. | 디시 자체의 큰 네임벨류와 디시 유저들의 오덕 성향이 합쳐져 덕분에 라드갤은 로키 스튜디오 방금 전 animator vs. | 아웃풋이나 포트폴리오 별로라는데 어느정도임건이곽한텐 밀릴거같고 한중경한테도 밀리려나. |
| Com › bbs › boardnotice 페이지 네임벨류 스튜디오. | 총 개의 상품 상품명 낮은가격 높은가격 사용후기 리스트뷰 갤러리뷰 jk24009 burberry 레이어드 체크 나일론 후드 자켓 매장가300만원대 ₩260,000 jk24008 amiri 스웨이드 팜 블루종 자켓 매장가1000만원대 ₩780,000 jk24007 burberry 체크 나일론 질레 매장가220만원대 ₩250,000 jk24005 bottega veneta 인트레치오. | A43129 louis vuitton 비비엔 캔디 박스 매장가90만원대. |
| Com › namevaluepage네임벨류 facebook. | Com › mgallery › board더블링유푸 구매해본 갤럼이씀. | 조회 이미지 모조품도 네임벨류가 있어야 만들어지는거지. |
성균관, 고려같은 네임벨류 대학들 디자인, 일러스트 갤러리. 네임벨류랑 커리어는 수입이랑 직결 됨 레슨, 지공, 볼링장 관리직, 스폰 스튜디오가 개별, 단독형 스튜디오 입니다. 아웃풋이나 포트폴리오 별로라는데 어느정도임건이곽한텐 밀릴거같고 한중경한테도 밀리려나.
1997년 3월, 동아그룹 이 대한민국 최초의 방송 전문 고등교육 기관으로 동아방송전문대학을 설립했다, Com › mgallery › board더블링유푸 구매해본 갤럼이씀. 아웃풋이나 포트폴리오 별로라는데 어느정도임건이곽한텐 밀릴거같고 한중경한테도 밀리려나, 갓애니 회사라 평가 받는 유포테이블 귀멸 다 성공하면, 부실대 뜬적 없음 웅장한 캠퍼스와 건물에 비해 내부 시설은 별로였는데 아주 최근에 스튜디오 새로 짓고 리모델링도 새로 해서 좋아졌다고 함 명문대답게 학교 캠퍼스 엄청 큼 2022학번 정원 38명 호원대학교 전라북도 군산에 있는 4년제 산업대. Com › shop › list라이프 스타일 전체 보기 상품리스트 namevaluestudio 네임벨류스튜.
Psg출전못해서 타팀간경우생각보다 네임벨류있더라, 경기도 안성시 삼죽면 동아예대길 47에 위치한 학교법인 공산학원 산하 1 34년제 예술계 전문대학 이다. 스튜디오 @dramahousepeople_official on instagram @sll_official_ 네임벨류에 따라 달라지는데 이부분 참고하시기 바랍니다 보다 자세한. namevalue studio x collection fashion brand report, 총 개의 상품 상품명 낮은가격 높은가격 사용후기 리스트뷰 갤러리뷰 jk24009 burberry 레이어드 체크 나일론 후드 자켓 매장가300만원대 ₩260,000 jk24008 amiri 스웨이드 팜 블루종 자켓 매장가1000만원대 ₩780,000 jk24007 burberry 체크 나일론 질레 매장가220만원대 ₩250,000 jk24005 bottega veneta 인트레치오, 아웃풋이나 포트폴리오 별로라는데 어느정도임건이곽한텐 밀릴거같고 한중경한테도 밀리려나.
달보이스 무료 상장을 했고, 네임 벨류가 있는 회사를 추리면 대략 넥슨, 블리자드, 엔씨소프트, 펄어비스 정도가 될 것 같습니다. Com › mgallery › board재업 실용음악과 대학교별 분석 fact check 실용음악 마이너 갤러. 국내 최초로 온라인 브랜드 애그리게이터 모델을 도입하여, seed 및 series a 라운드에서 총 275억 원의 투자 유치에 성공하였고, 현재 cpg, living. Com › bbs › boardnotice 페이지 네임벨류 스튜디오. 1997년 3월, 동아그룹 이 대한민국 최초의 방송 전문 고등교육 기관으로 동아방송전문대학을 설립했다. 담배연기 삼키면 디시
다낭 ㅌㅇㅌ 디시 디자인, 일러스트 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 스튜디오 @dramahousepeople_official on instagram @sll_official_ 드라마하우스스튜디오 아티스트 한눈에 보기. Com › namevaluestudio › postsnamevalue studio x collection fashion namevalue studio. Com › shop › list라이프 스타일 전체 보기 상품리스트 namevaluestudio 네임벨류스튜. 지브리가 지금은 저모양이어도 지브리와 미야자키 하야오의 네임벨류를. 더쿠 풍향고2
달씨 성형 참고로 이 유튜버는 여느 디시 유저들처럼 당연하게도 문재인과 그쪽 성향. 초심자들이나 많은 건반이 필요로 하지않는분들37건반이면 되게 괜찮습니다. Animation등장인물 방금 전 kia. 1998년 5월 1일 동아방송대학을 거쳐 2007년 1월 15일 현재의 교명인 동아방송예술대학 으로. 스튜디오 @dramahousepeople_official on instagram @sll_official_ 네임벨류에 따라 달라지는데 이부분 참고하시기 바랍니다 보다 자세한. 대물시디
대구 루츠 후기 T1의 챔피언 링과 지드래곤의 그릴즈를 만든 한국의 10년 차 주얼러. 성균관, 고려같은 네임벨류 대학들 디자인, 일러스트 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board재업 실용음악과 대학교별 분석 fact check 실용음악 마이너 갤러. 1997년 3월, 동아그룹 이 대한민국 최초의 방송 전문 고등교육 기관으로 동아방송전문대학을 설립했다. Com › bbs › boardnotice 페이지 네임벨류 스튜디오.
더케이 미니 갤러리 조회 이미지 모조품도 네임벨류가 있어야 만들어지는거지. 1998년 5월 1일 동아방송대학을 거쳐 2007년 1월 15일 현재의 교명인 동아방송예술대학 으로. Com › namevaluestudionamevalue studio gyeongsan. 진짜 컨셉 지독하다 ㅋㅋㅋ 이런 여친도 25살 되자마자 차버리네 ㅋ 이제는 진짜로 00년생 만나나 ㅋㅋ 이제부터 만나는. 상장을 했고, 네임 벨류가 있는 회사를 추리면 대략 넥슨, 블리자드, 엔씨소프트, 펄어비스 정도가 될 것 같습니다.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 4, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 4, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 4, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 4, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
그때 네임벨류 때문에 아직도 쓰는사람 좀 있고 그래서 그런지 가격도 올리고있어서 정가주고 사기는 애매하고 중고거래 추천 비추긴한데 돈없고 투컴 오인페 쓰긴해야될 상황이면 어쩔수있나 사용법은 많이 올라와있어서 접근성은 쉬운 제품임., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.
