Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

삼진스 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 쏘스 빌랩 아일릿 등등 수많은 소송패소에 배상금이 기다리고 있음. 이거 예전부터 하고 싶었던 말인데, 여러 언론사 유튜브. 삼진스의 운명 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리.

Oyasumitsuki_ Av

삼진스 요구조건 떴다 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리. 11일 어도어는 해인, 혜린이 복귀 의사를 밝혀왔다고 밝히며 화해를 공식화 했다, 삼진스 요구조건 떴다 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리, Com › apps › newsinside삼진스, 가출도 복귀도 일방통행&mldr. Com › board › view안진용삼진스는 민희진 프로듀서 복귀를 요구중인듯 실시간 베, 《김지원의 슈팅스타》김지원 텐아시아 가요팀 기자가 슈팅스타처럼 톡톡 튀고 시원하게 가요계를 맛보여드립니다.

이름의 유래는 가위로 자르다를 뜻하는 일본어 하사무はさむ로, 스라크가 사마귀 + 칼이.. 혜린, 해인은 어도어를 통해 복귀 소식을 알렸지만 민지, 하니, 다니엘 이른바 삼진스는 개별 법무법인을 통해 복귀를 선언했다.. 남의 구장에서 kkk 붙이고 있는 한화팬..

남의 구장에서 kkk 붙이고 있는 한화팬, 뭐 완전체로 복귀하면 하이브한테 감사해함, 혜린, 해인은 어도어를 통해 복귀 소식을 알렸지만 민지, 하니, 다니엘 이른바 삼진스는 개별 법무법인을 통해 복귀를 선언했다. 但願人長久 20251202 1248 ip 121, 해린과 혜인, 민지와 하니, 다니엘이 각각의 묶음으로 복귀를 알렸다, 어차피 똑같이 하이브 어도어 욕할건대 뭐 걍 무시하고 운영해도 됨 잘해주면 잘해주는대로 욕하고.

13 2247 뉴진스 3인방 삼진스의 복귀 요구조건 국정원4차장 조회 수 58085 추천 수 122 댓글 89 s. Com › community › board연예삼진스 3명 호다닥 들어온 이유 추정. 뉴진스 내부적으로도 의견이 갈린 모양새다. 이거 예전부터 하고 싶었던 말인데, 여러 언론사 유튜브, 해린과 혜인이 어도어 복귀를 선언했고, 3시간 뒤 민지, 하니, 다니엘이 부득이하게 동참을 통보했다.

민희진은 삼진스 절대 포기 못한다 걸스플래닛999 갤러리.. 세 멤버는 어도어를 거치지 않고 별도의 법무법인을 통해 기자들에게 입장문을 배포했다..

Orijee Fapello

인플루언서 고말숙본명 장인서이 스폰서를 제안하는 dm을 폭로했다, 삼진스는 민지 때문에 아무것도 준비 할수가 없지. 이름의 유래는 가위로 자르다를 뜻하는 일본어 하사무はさむ로, 스라크가 사마귀 + 칼이.

삼진스의 운명 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리. 정신 못차렸네 저래놓고 복귀 주장한거야. Com › community › board연예삼진스 3명 호다닥 들어온 이유 추정, 하지만 삼진스, 민지, 하니, 다니엘의 복귀 방식은 전혀 달랐다, 언제올지 모르는 3명이랑은 계속 소송하고 복귀2명이랑 새로 몇명뽑아서 뉴진스 2기 할께용 이러는거 이미 피프티피프티로 선례가 있음 기존팬 반발, 해린과 혜인이 어도어 복귀를 선언했고, 3시간 뒤 민지, 하니, 다니엘이 부득이하게 동참을 통보했다.

Overlord Albedo Porn

고말숙 노출 화보 212 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리 으이그, 공지 걸스플래닛999 갤러리 공식 성명문 걸스플래닛999 갤러리 성명문본 갤러리는 민지, 하니, 다니엘 이하 ‘삼진스’ 의 어도어 복귀 통보에 대해 강력히 유감을 표한다. 但願人長久 20251202 1248 ip 121, 인플루언서 고말숙본명 장인서이 스폰서를 제안하는 dm을 폭로했다, 삼진스는 민지 때문에 아무것도 준비 할수가 없지.

거기에 밝혀진 정황만으로도 배임 read more. 댓글수정이거 쉴드치는 한화팬들은 대전구장에서 타팀 선수가 삼진잡을 때마다 원정팬들이 벽에 붙여도 오케이 하는거죠. Com › kokr › news삼진스, 가출도 복귀도 일방통행&mldr.

Com › news › read왜 이진스를 만드냐고. 고말숙 노출 화보 212 롯데 자이언츠 갤러리 으이그, 민희진, 대중 기만한 비겁한 프레임 ss초점. 하니 해린 혜인의 새 뉴진스입니다 삼진스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 안진용 3인 실제로 복귀과정에서 민줌 언급 조선일보 기사 내용 토대로 취재를 시작했고, 주변을 통해서 알아보니깐 실제로 3인이 복귀과정에서 민희진을 언급했다고 함 삼진스, 복귀조건은.

nmixx ヌード 뉴진스 내부적으로도 의견이 갈린 모양새다. Com › community › board연예삼진스 3명 호다닥 들어온 이유 추정. 공지 걸스플래닛999 갤러리 공식 성명문 걸스플래닛999 갤러리 성명문본 갤러리는 민지, 하니, 다니엘 이하 ‘삼진스’ 의 어도어 복귀 통보에 대해 강력히 유감을 표한다. 2명만 받으면 배신하면 돌아올 수 있다는 안전장치 4. 149 댓글 삼진스 아웃 beherenow 20251202 1249 ip 121. oh6582 nude

pegging onlyfans models 뉴진스 내부적으로도 의견이 갈린 모양새다. 인플루언서 고말숙본명 장인서이 스폰서를 제안하는 dm을 폭로했다. 공지 걸스플래닛999 갤러리 공식 성명문 걸스플래닛999 갤러리 성명문본 갤러리는 민지, 하니, 다니엘 이하 ‘삼진스’ 의 어도어 복귀 통보에 대해 강력히 유감을 표한다. 하니 해린 혜인의 새 뉴진스입니다 삼진스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 삼진스 요구조건 떴다 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리. one piece hitomi

pig.av 세 멤버는 어도어를 거치지 않고 별도의 법무법인을 통해 기자들에게 입장문을 배포했다. 삼진스는 민지 때문에 아무것도 준비 할수가 없지. 뉴진스가 567일 만에 수건을 던졌다. 언제올지 모르는 3명이랑은 계속 소송하고 복귀2명이랑 새로 몇명뽑아서 뉴진스 2기 할께용 이러는거 이미 피프티피프티로 선례가 있음 기존팬 반발. 해린과 혜인이 어도어 복귀를 선언했고, 3시간 뒤 민지, 하니, 다니엘이 부득이하게 동참을 통보했다. nba 순위

nhdtc-101 뉴진스 내부적으로도 의견이 갈린 모양새다. 삼진스 요구조건 떴다 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리. 하지만 삼진스, 민지, 하니, 다니엘의 복귀 방식은 전혀 달랐다. 11일 어도어는 해인, 혜린이 복귀 의사를 밝혀왔다고 밝히며 화해를 공식화 했다. Com › board › view법원, 민희진 카톡 증거로 채택 무당 58000건 대화 어떡하나 걸스.

onlyfans cafe Com › news › read왜 이진스를 만드냐고. 민희진은 삼진스 절대 포기 못한다 걸스플래닛999 갤러리. 하지만 삼진스, 민지, 하니, 다니엘의 복귀 방식은 전혀 달랐다. 삼진스는 민지 때문에 아무것도 준비 할수가 없지. 안진용 3인 실제로 복귀과정에서 민줌 언급 조선일보 기사 내용 토대로 취재를 시작했고, 주변을 통해서 알아보니깐 실제로 3인이 복귀과정에서 민희진을 언급했다고 함 삼진스, 복귀조건은.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.