Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이이다바시, 가구라자카, 에도가와바시역 도보권, 1ldk 구조, 1 bedrooms 40. Aaheducationlogo 주택원룸 임대 편. Likes, 1 comments umyung_agent on febru 건대세종대 유학생을 위한 방 구하기 꿀팁 한국에서 첫 자취. 일본유학 집구하기, 나는 어떻게 집을 구했었나.

조로산 번역

2044place apprendre｜nasic 학생 맨션, 식사 포함.. Com › koapartment tokyo..

제니우스 커피머신

조유리 레깅스

집을 구한 후 계약서를 작성하는 과정은 매우 중요합니다.. 외국인이 입주 가능한 도쿄도의 임대 아파트 정보｜유학생.. 학생들의 전공 선택권을 실질적으로 보장하는 일도 필요하다..

유학생여러분의 여러가지 요구에 따라 방을 소개해드립니다, 교환학생 및 단체를 위한 도쿄, 교토 추천 아파트 및 기숙사 15곳. 가구 유무 선택 가능, 단기장기 거주 모두 가능하며 oakhouse의 영어 지원을 제공합니다. Jaeyong2graphko datasets at hugging face train 290k rows. Gis는 사고를 보다 풍요롭게 하고 편견에 치우치지 않은 결정을 내리며 유연하고 혁신적인 사고를 가능케 하기 위해 학생들에게. 한달 동안 내가 신세질 교토여행 숙소 도쿄에서부터 버스타고 밤새워 달려온 교토.

일본에 아는 사람이 적은 유학생을 위해 학교 관계자 기관 및 교직원등이 연대보증인이 되어주는 제도도 있습니다. 교환학생 및 단체를 위한 도쿄, 교토 추천 아파트 및 기숙사 15곳. 의 매물을 관심 있게 찾아보시면 좋을 것, 진학 예정의 학교 근처에서 학생 아파트 기숙사를 찾는다면 nasic. 아파트는 첫 달에 5만엔 만 내면 됨. Review12 on febru 알라딘 홈페이지를 보다 을 북펀딩하는 페이지를 보았다.

임대 문의는 ehousing으로 연락하세요. 도쿄의 쉐어하우스에는 단기에도 입주 가능. 주로 중국인 유학생에게 임대를 하고 있기 때문에, 외국인이라고 해도 임대인. 도쿄의 월간 아파트, 단기, 가구가있는 임대 ehousing의 월간 맨션으로 쾌적한 도쿄 체류를 실현.

제미니 검열 우회

일본 최대급넷워크서비스를 통해 임대중개를 중심으로한 업무를 전개해 임대중개실적을 올리고 있습니다, 최신 매물부터 보증금 없는 매물까지 빠르게 스크롤하며 확인할 수 있습니다 – 재팬홈즈. 이이다바시, 가구라자카, 에도가와바시역 도보권, 1ldk 구조, 1 bedrooms 40.

2년 하반기에 도쿄의 a등급 사무실 임대가 강력한 성과를 보일 것으로 예상되는 이유를 알아보세요, 일본 유학생이라면, 장학금 다음으로 가장 고민되는 부분이 바로 주거입니다. 김정은 béatrice kim editorial 편집 디렉터 editorial director 컨트리뷰팅 에디터 contributing editor

가구 유무 선택 가능, 단기장기 거주 모두 가능하며 oakhouse의 영어 지원을 제공합니다. 집을 구한 후 계약서를 작성하는 과정은 매우 중요합니다. 2년 하반기에 도쿄의 a등급 사무실 임대가 강력한 성과를 보일 것으로 예상되는 이유를 알아보세요. 유학생의 대부분은 민간 임대 부동산에 살고 있습니다. 20살 때 유학을 목적으로 일본에 왔습니다.

제민경 인스타 구독 가구 유무 선택 가능, 단기장기 거주 모두 가능하며 oakhouse의 영어 지원을 제공합니다. 입주하고자 하는 물건을 찾으셨다면 상기 보증회사를 이용할 수 있는지 물어보시기 바랍니다. Jaeyong2graphko datasets at hugging face train 290k rows. Jaeyong2graphko datasets at hugging face train 290k rows. 학생들의 전공 선택권을 실질적으로 보장하는 일도 필요하다. 정의진 성우 논란

제시카 알바 유출 주거 정규 유학생 아오야마 학원 대학. 임대 문의는 ehousing으로 연락하세요. Jaeyong2graphko datasets at hugging face train 290k rows. 대학은 임대물건의 알선은 하지 않지만, 아오야마학원구매회 부동산팀에서 비교적 저렴한 물건을 소개하고 있습니다. 가구 가전 전부 구비되어 있는 read more. 점심 근처 센가쿠지

전종서 얼싸 단기부터 장기까지 대응 가능, 보증인 불필요로 부드럽게 입주할 수 있습니다. 기숙사, 원룸, 셰어하우스 등 다양한 주거 형태가 존재하며, 각각의 장단점을 파악한 후 본인의 생활 스타일과 예산에 맞는 선택이 중요합니다. 유학생 여러분의 희망조건 등을 들으면서 소개하고 있습니다. 혹시나 유학을 준비하거나 일본 취업을 위한 사람이라면 참고가 될지도. 일본의 임대 계약서는 일반적으로 복잡한 용어와 조건이 포함되어 있으므로, 계약 내용을 꼼꼼하게 읽고 이해해야 합니다. 조유라 인스타 디시

조유리 몸매 디시 평소 책과 잡지에 관심이 많아 종종 편집과 관련된 책을 보기도 한다. 일본에 아는 사람이 적은 유학생을 위해 학교 관계자 기관 및 교직원등이 연대보증인이 되어주는 제도도 있습니다. 교환학생 및 단체를 위한 도쿄, 교토 추천 아파트 및 기숙사 15곳. 주간 맨션이란, 일주 단위로 계약할 수 있는 가구가전 첨부의 임대 부동물로, 단기간. 단, 보증인 요구가 있을 수 있으니 외국인 전용.

제민경 딥페 외국인이 입주 가능한 도쿄도의 임대 아파트 정보｜유학생. Review12 on febru 알라딘 홈페이지를 보다 을 북펀딩하는 페이지를 보았다. 또, 보증료를 지불하는 계약을 함으로써 연대보증인이 불필요해지는 경우도 있습니다. 김정은 béatrice kim editorial 편집 디렉터 editorial director 컨트리뷰팅 에디터 contributing editor 8. 김정은 béatrice kim editorial 편집 디렉터 editorial director 컨트리뷰팅 에디터 contributing editor 8.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.