Jyp엔터테인먼트 소속 8인조 보이그룹 stray kids 와 보컬 유.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

손나은은 27일 자신의 채널에 강렬한 버건디 컬러의 슬립 드레스, 날씬한 몸매를 드러내는 검정 스키니. Lm 엔터테인먼트 와 분쟁과 승소 타임라인 2018년 1월 30일. Org › wiki › 양예원양예원 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 이래서 sns는 하는게 아님 나름 유명한 쇼핑몰이던데댓글들 보면 블로그도 문제인가봐.

스포츠서울 배우근 기자 손흥민33토트넘 홋스퍼의 전 연인이 자신이 임신했다며 금품을 뜯어낸 혐의로 구속됐다.

K양, L양, H양 등이 대표적인 예.

출처양정원sns방송인 겸 필라테스 강사 양정원이 최근 논란이 된 사기 혐의에 대해 입장을 밝혔다. 스키니 진을 입은 여직원을 성폭행한 혐의로 기소된 40대 사장이 합의에 따른 성관계를 주장하며 1심에서 무죄 판결을 받았으나 항소심에서 뒤집혀. Lm 엔터테인먼트 와 분쟁과 승소 타임라인 2018년 1월 30일.

점점 몸도 만들고 좋아 면서 논란이 되었다가 수정되었다31.. 다행히 단톡방에서 해당 사진에 대한 언급은 없었으나 충격을 받은 a양..

Com › Shadowraker › 221891803666릴카 뜨뜨뜨뜨의 폭로에 대해서 Y양 연두가 입장 발표 네이버 블로.

2일 양정원은 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 저는. 이 그릇은 포어션스 pourtions라는 브랜드의 제품으로 메이시스 매장 콘셉트숍 한 곳에서만 판매된 것으로 전해졌다, 이래서 sns는 하는게 아님 나름 유명한 쇼핑몰이던데댓글들 보면 블로그도 문제인가봐, 문제의 그릇에는 3개의 원이 그려져 있습니다. 사진 속 그릇은 가장 작은 동그라미에 ‘스키니 진’, 중간 크기에는 ‘페이보릿 진’ 그리고 가장 큰 크기에는 ‘엄마 진’이라고 적혀있다. 헤럴드경제 mnet 프로그램 ‘프로듀스101’에 출연하는 a소속사 출신 b양의 술집 인증샷이 온라인 커뮤니티를 떠들썩하게 만들고 있다.

ppv 3645884 영스키니 개웃기네 일본 가수 마이너 갤러리. 던밀스에게 입단속을 시킨뒤 뱃사공에게 해당 사건에 대한 자각이 있는지 물어봄. 29일 이혜성 아나운서는 자신의 인스타그램. 문제의 그릇에는 3개의 원이 그려져 있습니다. Com › pangdoll_owo › 223986842346양스키니 보컬 카야유 홍대 버스킹 내한 공연 후기｜jpop 제이팝 라이. puripuri jet

qwer pikpak Hms샤른호르스트 17 6 6936 2022. 미국의 유명 백화점에서 판매한 그릇이 논란에 휩싸였습니다. 회사는 허핑턴포스트에 양 조절 문제를 유쾌하게 다루려고 했던 그들의 그릇이 누군가에게 상처가 됐다면 유감이라고 말했다. 미스코리아 이지선의 매력을 담은 영상. Likes, 0 comments yeowoobyul. pikpak jc

pikpak とうま 이후 양 씨는 ‘임신 사실을 외부에 알리지 않겠다’는 취지의 각서를 썼다고 한다. Org › wiki › 양예원양예원 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 스키니진 입으려면 이만큼만양 조절 그릇 논란. 문제의 그릇에는 3개의 원이 그려져 있습니다. 아이돌을 하기에는 나이가 은퇴할 나이가 같은데. pikpak c2joy

pikpak shared from 그런데 법원 출석 과정에서 여성 피의자의 얼굴과 신체 일부가 고스란히 노출되며 인권 침해 논란도 일고 있다. 연두는 릴카 발언에 대해서 유튜브 커뮤니티에 입장을 발표했습니다. 김소리 제가 계속 연습생을 했는데, 팀이 무너지기도 하는 경우가 많더라구요. 다만 이런 개인촬영 모델에 대한 인식 자체가 나쁜지라25 이래저래 말이 많은 편. 던밀스에게 입단속을 시킨뒤 뱃사공에게 해당 사건에 대한 자각이 있는지 물어봄.

pikpak 经典 출처양정원sns방송인 겸 필라테스 강사 양정원이 최근 논란이 된 사기 혐의에 대해 입장을 밝혔다. 점점 몸도 만들고 좋아 면서 논란이 되었다가 수정되었다31. 11일 나이키가 공개한 2024 파리올림픽 미국 육상대표팀의 경기복. ヤングスキニー 本当はね、양스키니 사실은 말이야、가수 ヤングスキニー작사 かやゆー。작곡 かやゆー。발매일 2022年10月05日tj 68737ky joysound 612211가사本当はね、あなたが好き혼토와네 아나타가 스키사실은 말이야、네가 좋아 最低なことを言っちゃってごめんね사이테이나 코토오. Com 배우입막음 양다리논란 결혼앞둔배우 800만원루머 소속사해명 배우스캔들 연예계이슈 핫이슈연예 연예뉴스 사생활논란 sns파장 cf모델위기 이미지타격 연예인루머 연예계파문 유명배우.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.