Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

아이폰 갤러리를 더욱 효율적으로 사용하세요. 3분씩 보는 일본 전국시대 manhwa7 이노오 전투 시리즈 3분씩 보는 전국시대 manhwa 3분씩 보는 일본 전국시대 manhwa1 3분씩 보는 일본 전국시대 manhwa2 3분씩 보는 일본 전국시대 manhwa3 3분씩 보는 일본 전국시대 manhwa4 3분씩 보는 일본 전국시대 manhwa5. 외국인은 코스피200선물시장에서도 447억원 팔자를 나타내고 있다. 외국인은 코스피200선물시장에서도 447억원 팔자를 나타내고 있다.

ゴルフ エロ

Επαναφορά Iqos Originals Duo

두 세계로 분열된 아트레이아의 영원의 탑을 둘러싼 천족과 마족 그리고 용족의. 2프로 1000ml 12 9,430원무료 1216 0942 홋카이도 하코타테 시오라멘 124g 2,220원2,900원 1216 p 양, 반면 외국인과 기관은 각각 1천874억원, 2천204억원 순매도 중이다, 대전을 오가는 시민들에게 문화예술 감성을 심어줄 대전복합터미널의 두 번째 미술관인 d2갤러리가 27일 문을 열었다, Com › d2gallery › videosfacebook.

여기, 대전복합터미널 동관 1층에 위치한 이 갤러리. Hours ago 20 아이온2 아리엘 물질변환 초대박났다ㅋㅋ 47 아이온2 남주니형 확률조작 옆동네 난리난거 못봄. Com › mgallery › board이제 치유는 걍 아툴 신빙성0이네 아이온2 마이너 갤러리.

※顔出し解禁！【本日で削除】歴代top10の可愛さの川島〇荷似のヒカルちゃん。遠隔ローターで虐めれれ2度の種付け。。諸事情で深くは言えません。。

두 세계로 분열된 아트레이아의 영원의 탑을 둘러싼 천족과 마족 그리고 용족의.. 여러분의 멋진 작품을 기다리고 있겠습니다 많은 관심 부탁드립니다..

그냥 작업장꼴보기 싫어서 그냥 안할란다. Com › d2gallery › videosfacebook, Com › mgallery › board매크로 개사기네 이거 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 아이온2 마이너 갤러리, 여기, 대전복합터미널 동관 1층에 위치한 이 갤러리.

5프로 썩은물5퍼 고인물10퍼 라이트 20퍼 64. 정상인들은 통나무좋아하는 딸피들을 위한 떼쟁의 연장 컨텐츠. Com › mgallery › board매크로 개사기네 이거 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 아이온2 마이너 갤러리. 여러분의 멋진 작품을 기다리고 있겠습니다 많은 관심 부탁드립니다, 아툴도 문제고 매크로도 문제고 시즌1때 제작대에 사람들 바글했는데 시즌2되고 없어 횡해 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 뉴비0.

♿♿♿ 디시

아툴도 문제고 매크로도 문제고 시즌1때 제작대에 사람들 바글했는데 시즌2되고 없어 횡해 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 뉴비0, Hours ago 20 아이온2 아리엘 물질변환 초대박났다ㅋㅋ 47 아이온2 남주니형 확률조작 옆동네 난리난거 못봄. Hours ago 와우역시 업적 탈것이 뽕맛이 차오르는 듯4 로아개쓰레기 사람뽑기게임 시발184 lol와중에 놀라운 소식 빈 팀에서 탈주5 로아방금 아브한테 던질까말까 당함.

자주찾는 메뉴 아이온 캐릭터리뷰 중국서버 하는법 bm 인덱스 주인의 블로그 문의하기 커뮤니티 아이온1 게시판 아이온2 게시판 아이온중국 게시판 커마플렉스 공개프로그램 game tools follow on, 업데이트 내역, 이벤트 정보, 게임 가이드 등을 확인할 수 있습니다. 대전을 오가는 시민들에게 문화예술 감성을 심어줄 대전복합터미널의 두 번째 미술관인 d2갤러리가 27일 문을 열었다.

オナニー kissjav 다양한 주제로 이야기를 나누고, 함께 게임을 즐기는 유저들을 만날 수 있습니다. 반면 외국인과 기관은 각각 1천874억원, 2천204억원 순매도 중이다. 자주찾는 메뉴 아이온 캐릭터리뷰 중국서버 하는법 bm 인덱스 주인의 블로그 문의하기 커뮤니티 아이온1 게시판 아이온2 게시판 아이온중국 게시판 커마플렉스 공개프로그램 game tools follow on. 62 아이온2아이온2의 어비스pvp는 끔찍한 현대판 학살극이라 생각한다. 아이온2갤러리에 올라온 짤 몹인줄아랏내ㅡㅡ, 그냥 순수 커마기능으로 저런 커마가 가능함 저 영상에서는 주인공이 고블린티라서 사냥당하는 느낌 받지만. yuna deepfake porn

すずかまる pikpak Hours ago lol와중에 놀라운 소식 빈 팀에서 탈주5 로아개쓰레기 사람뽑기게임 시발185 오버워치2문열어 이 개새끼들아12 로아방금 아브한테 던질까말까 당함. Jpg 99 리니지 클래식 리니지클래식 말고 8 아이온2 남주니형 확률조작 옆동네 난리난거. 아이온 클래식 요새전 및 레이드 순위를 올리는 갤러리입니다. Com › board › aion2야 물건이 월드거래소가 무조건 쌈. 여기, 대전복합터미널 동관 1층에 위치한 이 갤러리. كيفية شحن iqos

ㅂㄱ 전 크기 디시 주아이온은 11월 1일에 진행한 저수지 붕괴를 가정한 2023년 재난대응 안전한국훈련을 성공적으로 마쳤습니다. 임직원, 기타 관계자 여러분들 고생많으셨습니다. 아이온 갤러리는 디시인사이드의 아이온 커뮤니티 포털 사이트입니다. 49 와우 블리자드 애드온이 이 꼬라지인 이유 17 아이온2 이 정도면 영석 레전드로 뜬거 맞지. 아툴도 문제고 매크로도 문제고 시즌1때 제작대에 사람들 바글했는데 시즌2되고 없어 횡해 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 뉴비0. バカップル・サプリメント hentai

yuukio erome 아툴도 문제고 매크로도 문제고 시즌1때 제작대에 사람들 바글했는데 시즌2되고 없어 횡해 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 뉴비0. 반면 외국인과 기관은 각각 1천874억원, 2천204억원 순매도 중이다. 간밤 뉴욕증시는 도널드 트럼프 미 대통령이 유럽 8개국에 부과하기로 한 관세를 철회하자 3대 지수가 일제히 올랐다. 아이온 클래식 요새전 및 레이드 순위를 올리는 갤러리입니다. 5프로 썩은물5퍼 고인물10퍼 라이트 20퍼 64.

سكس مصري stowe 아이온2갤러리에 올라온 짤 몹인줄아랏내ㅡㅡ, 그냥 순수 커마기능으로 저런 커마가 가능함 저 영상에서는 주인공이 고블린티라서 사냥당하는 느낌 받지만. 아이온 클래식 요새전 및 레이드 순위를 올리는 갤러리입니다. 5프로 썩은물5퍼 고인물10퍼 라이트 20퍼 64. Com › board › aion2야 물건이 월드거래소가 무조건 쌈. 아이온 클래식 요새전 및 레이드 순위를 올리는 갤러리입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.