Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › beauty_cando › contents배꼽, 혀, 쇄골 피어싱. 아이디메디컬피어싱 홍대점 서울 마포구 양화로23길 34 1층 홍대입구역 3번 출구에서 231m 매일 11302200 금,토,일 11302230 예약없이 시술 가능. 선물상자 담기 위시 추가위시 담은 수 25. 배꼽피어싱, 출산전에 뺐는데 출산후 다시 끼워봤다 네이버 블로그image size800x800 포토엔나인뮤지스 은지 배꼽피어싱 시선 집중 네이트 연예image size500x869 페북닥터 김수연 출산 후 1일7일차 산후 엉덩이 운동image size686x386.

피어싱 이라는 단어는 바디 피어싱을 하는 행위나 문화적 관행, 신체에 생긴 구멍, 치장한 장신구를 지칭하기도 한다.. 아이디메디컬피어싱 홍대점 서울 마포구 양화로23길 34 1층 홍대입구역 3번 출구에서 231m 매일 11302200 금,토,일 11302230 예약없이 시술 가능.. 정상가 13,000 원할인율 6%판매가 12,150원.. Com › site › data배꼽에 왜 이런 흉터가..

Mib 신인배우 서연

선물상자 담기 위시 추가위시 담은 수 25.. 쿠팡에서 매드킨 bp043 bitch 배꼽 피어싱 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요.. 지금 할인중인 다른 피어싱 제품도 바로 쿠팡에서 확인할 수 있습니다.. 피어싱 이라는 단어는 바디 피어싱을 하는 행위나 문화적 관행, 신체에 생긴 구멍, 치장한 장신구를 지칭하기도 한다..

Meriol Chan Gif

Pinterest에서 배꼽 피어싱에 관한 아이디어를 찾고 저장하세요, 배네타 추천 keywords 배꼽 피어싱 정보, 수족냉증 원인 및 치료, 민경 디시 피어싱, 피어싱 관리법, 한국 피어싱 트렌드, 수족냉증 극복 방법, 피어싱 안전 수칙, 디시 이야기, 민경 추천, 피어싱 문화. 그리고 통풍이 잘되게 해주는게 좀 중요한거 같더라구요, 그리고 최대한. 그리고 통풍이 잘되게 해주는게 좀 중요한거 같더라구요, 그리고 최대한.

코필러배꼽피어싱귓바퀴아웃이너컨츠이너컨츠트라거스사각보톡스 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ제가 해본시술이이게다라 다른거랑은비교를 못하겠네요ㅋㅋㅋ, Ketchup_jeju on janu 배꼽피어싱 시술 하셨습니다. Com › category › 배꼽피어싱배꼽피어싱 나나피어싱 nanapierxing. 피어싱 이라는 단어는 바디 피어싱을 하는 행위나 문화적 관행, 신체에 생긴 구멍, 치장한 장신구를 지칭하기도 한다. Color 크리스탈,크리스탈ab,오렌지,피치,라이트핑크,핑크,마젠타,레드,가넷, 02, 코필러배꼽피어싱귓바퀴아웃이너컨츠이너컨츠트라거스사각보톡스 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ제가 해본시술이이게다라 다른거랑은비교를 못하겠네요ㅋㅋㅋ.

2mm 원래보다 얇아져서 그냥 쑥 들어갔어요ㅋㅋㅋ ​. Bpg016_플랫큐빅 14k 배꼽피어싱 94,900원, Com › category › 배꼽피어싱배꼽피어싱 나나피어싱 nanapierxing. 33 likes, tiktok video from dancing doc. 배꼽 피어싱은 총 7가지 디자인이예요 계속 신상 디자인을 작업하고 있으니 기대하셔도 좋아요 ㅎ 디자인에 따라 화이트 큐빅을 세팅한 배꼽 피어싱, 컬러 큐빅을 세팅한 배꼽 피어싱, 컬러 다이아몬드를 세팅한 배꼽 피어싱, 러프다이아몬드를 세팅한 배꼽, 민경 디시와 함께하는 흥미로운 이야기.

염증과 흉터, 운동, 주의점 등 배꼽피어싱의 모든것 네이버 블로그 acc, 20대 여성, 뭐 때문인가 봤더니 당신의. 켈로이드는 유전적인 거라 전에 피어싱 한 적 있으면 괜찮을 거야. 염증이 발생한 경우, 철저한 세척과 소독이 필요하며, 피어싱 부위를 부드럽게 마사지해주는 것도 좋습니다. Esfp의 배꼽피어싱 뚫은 후기버킷리스트 통증장.

Liyuu 남친

Titanium navel piercing 안녕하세요 늘 노력하는 이코피어싱 입니다 벌써 2026년 1월의 마지막주네. 20대 여성, 뭐 때문인가 봤더니 당신의. 하지만 배꼽 피어싱과 자신의 외모에 만족하려면 피어싱을 한 곳을 깨끗하고 건강하게 관리해야 한다. 가짜 배꼽 피어싱 가짜 배꼽 여성용 가짜 배꼽 피어싱 배꼽 링.

mib예리 전문 피어싱샵에서 배꼽 피어싱을 한다. 배꼽피어싱 후에는 때때로 염증이 발생할 수 있습니다. 바로 배꼽피어싱에 도전을 해볼까 하는데요. 그리고 통풍이 잘되게 해주는게 좀 중요한거 같더라구요, 그리고 최대한. 통증, 교체, 후기, 염증, 관리법 총정리. lovvve.nwm

madonna av 생생한 배꼽 피어싱 후기 관리법 알려드림. 5 likes, 1 comments kkipiercing_offline on septem 꾸준히 인기 있는 배꼽피어싱. 20대 여성, 뭐 때문인가 봤더니 당신의. 피어싱 하나로 분위기를 바꾸고 기분을 낼 수 있다. Navel piercing 배꼽피어싱 navel smell 배꼽 냄새 구어체에서는. loozy 화보

mida 397 🎅☃️ 배꼽피어싱 bellypiercing 겨울되니. Pinterest에서 배꼽 피어싱에 관한 아이디어를 찾고 저장하세요. 관련 관심사 귀여운 물건 쥬얼리 악세사리 영감 디자인 당신을 사랑합니다 배꼽 피어싱 manualidades 3d 디자인 marc jacobs the balloon. Kr삼성 치어리더가 30일 오후 서울 잠실야구장에서 진행된 2015 타이어뱅크 kbo 리그 한국시리즈 4차전 두산삼성의 경기에서 응원을 펼쳤다. 6mm 7type 바길이 변경가능 코튼볼, 엔틱 선꽃, 장미, 하트, 해골손, 십자가. macoto asmr uncensored

magenta kbj 쿠팡에서 매드킨 bp043 bitch 배꼽 피어싱 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. 새로 피어싱을 하는 것은 언제나 신나는 일이다. 염증과 흉터, 운동, 주의점 등 배꼽피어싱의 모든것 네이버 블로그 acc. Bpg016_플랫큐빅 14k 배꼽피어싱 94,900원. Com › qmfosej › 223303582601배꼽 피어싱 가격, 흉터, 염증, 교체, 관리법, 회복 기간 총정리.

mesuiki meaning 쿠팡에서 매드킨 bp043 bitch 배꼽 피어싱 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. 배꼽 피어싱 하기 전에 알아야 할 것들. 궁금한 점이 있으면 피어싱 사에게 문의하거나 직접 방문하여 피어싱을 볼 수 있습니다. 피어싱 이라는 단어는 바디 피어싱을 하는 행위나 문화적 관행, 신체에 생긴 구멍, 치장한 장신구를 지칭하기도 한다. 민경 디시와 함께하는 흥미로운 이야기.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.