Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

정몽규 도 보충역이지만 공식적으로는 군필자다. 건강식 빵만들기 no 밀가루 오트밀 고구마 바나나 계란2개 그냥 건강한 맛빵 아들이 read more. 북한 빨치산 2세대의 대표주자인 최룡해 노동당 비서가 해임된 건 북한 정권이 빨치산 세력에 대해 구조조정에 들어간 것으로 봐야 한다는 분석이 나왔습니다. 시상식에는 한강 작가를 비롯해 재단 이사장인 정몽규 hdc 회장, 고 故 정세영 현대산업개발 명예회장의 부인 박영자 씨 등이 참석했다.

톳테 누리

탬 탬버린 실물 썰

There are 10+ professionals named 박영자, who use linkedin to exchange information, ideas, and opportunities.. 김정은으로 대변되는 북한의 변화는 ict 분야에서도 활발하게 이뤄지고 있는 것으로 확인됐다..

정몽규 도 보충역이지만 공식적으로는 군필자다. 2013년 이후 국책연구기관인 통일연구원 연구위원으로 북한을 중심으로 한 시스템, 체제 변동, 균열과 통합 등을 연구하고 있다. 25 november 1915 – 21 march 2001 was a south korean entrepreneur and the founder of hyundai group. 박영자의 작품 소개, 구매 방법, 리뷰 등을 확인하세요.

트랄 랄 레리 토스 여자

그의 대표작으로는 1940년생 그녀의 결심 13,500원, 텐트 안의 울음소리 13,500원, 내 안의 목소리 12,600원원 등이 있으며 자세한 내용은 박영자 페이지 안에서 확인해보세요. 1995년2019년 안양 일요화가회 회원전, 그의 대표작으로는 북한 녀자 17,640원, 북한주민의 가정생활 국가의 기획과 국가로부터 독립 16,000원, 동북아 정세 변화와 북한의 전략적 선택 15,000원원 등이 있으며 자세한 내용은 박영자 페이지 안에서 확인해보세요, 박영자작가는 대한민국의 국내인물,시인 입니다, 허브 정원 264 пина 6 мес.

More about this channel more. Com › public › 박영자박영자 profiles facebook. 방송기술저널 전숙희 기자 박영자 통일연구원 북한 연구실 실장은 ‘북한의 경제사회 변화와 정보화’라는 주제로 강연했다.

그날부터 세상은 온통 우울한 회색빛으로만. View the profiles of professionals named 박영자 on linkedin. 1995년2019년 안양 일요화가회 회원전, 햇볕이 사정없이 내리 쬐는데도 아래윗니가 덜덜덜 소리를 내며 부딪는다. 양지쪽 담벼락에 기대어 눈을 꼭 감았다.

탄지로 엄마

그의 대표작으로는 북한 녀자 17,640원, 북한주민의 가정생활 국가의 기획과 국가로부터 독립 16,000원, 동북아 정세 변화와 북한의 전략적 선택 15,000원원 등이 있으며 자세한 내용은 박영자 페이지 안에서 확인해보세요, 양지쪽 담벼락에 기대어 눈을 꼭 감았다. ‘전주 8미’ 한상 차림으로 널리 알려진 전주 한정식을 소개하는 데 헌신한 박영자 우리맛연구회장이 지난 7일 세상을 떠났다. Join facebook to connect with 박영자 박영자. Chung juyung or jung jooyoung korean 정주영.

타코 이벤트 날짜 More about this channel more more. 박영자 byj0707888 — профиль. 햇볕이 사정없이 내리 쬐는데도 아래윗니가 덜덜덜 소리를 내며 부딪는다. 박영자는 통일연구원 북한연구실장으로 북한과 한국의 역사와 현실에 대해 연구하는 작가이다. 박영자 국내작가 문학가 1938 1938년 11월 2일 일본에서 태어나 경북 김천에서 어린 시절을 보냈다. 투캅스 1 다시보기

통일교 디시 한국 통일연구원이 16일 북한의 노동당 제7차 대회의 평가와 전망을 주제로 통일포럼을 개최했습니다. 1995년2019년 안양 일요화가회 회원전. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the. 성균관대학교 영어영문학학사, 계명대학교 글로벌창업대학원 창업학 석사학위를 취득했다. More about this channel more. 트위터 다윤

트위터 j 2020학년도 고2 9월 학력평가 해설강의 수학 박자영쌤의 수학 2부1421번 해설강의 바로가기 sbit. 박영자 연구위원통일연구원 북한연구실이 박사 논문을 준비하던 2000년대 초반은 북한 주민의 탈북 러시가 이어지던 때였다. 바람은 어디서부터 불어와서 어디쯤서 사라지는가. 박영자 byj0707888 — профиль. More about this channel more. 텐겐 과거 디시

트위터 기다림 짤 Days ago 범현대가는 범lg가, 범한화가 와 더불어 병역 의무를 충실히 이행하는 명문가다. 25 november 1915 – 21 march 2001 was a south korean entrepreneur and the founder of hyundai group. 박영자 park young ja 2009년 공무원 미술대전 2011년 시흥사랑 사제동행전 단체전 1995년2019년 안양 일요화가회 회원전 단체전 수십회. 할아버지3, 할머니 박영자4 아버지 김정언5, 어머니6 여동생 김나경7. 2004년 성균관대학교에서 정치학 박사 학위를 받고, 숙명여자대학교, 성균관대학교, 이화여자대학교에서 교수로 재직하며 북한 체제를 연구했습니다.

트와이스 딸감 디시 한국의 종합출판사로서 문학, 인문, 교양, 어린이, 청소년, 그림책 등 다양한 분야의 양서를 출간하고 있습니다. Chung juyung or jung jooyoung korean 정주영. 2011년 시흥사랑 사제동행전 단체전. 박영자는 통일연구원 북한연구실장으로 북한과 한국의 역사와 현실에 대해 연구하는 작가이다. 박영자작가는 대한민국의 국내인물,시인 입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.