Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

201707202102 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. ㅇㅋㅌ 친구가 정해인 권혁수 사귄다고 해서 그거 루머라고. 정해인 권혁수 게이 갑자기 뜬 이유 정리해봅니다. 권혁수 유튜브 채널 프로필 사진 q.

아기맹수 Erome

Com › qna › detail권혁수,박보검,정해인 게이임, 댓글 0 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 몇달전에 시작되었던 정해인 권혁수 게이 이야기는. Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. Com › board › view정해인 권혁수아냐.

아가파오 워십 논란

정해인 권혁수 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리.. 몸매, 성형, 군대, 학교, 가족, 나이, 키 정보 정리..

Com › board › view정해인 권혁수 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리, 개인적으로 아무리 추측 해보아도 정해인 권혁수 갑자기 뜰만한 이유가 없다고 생각 되는게 주로. 과연 무슨 이야기 인지 알아보겠습니다. 처음에는 브이로그 형식으로 권혁수의 삶을 보여주는 영상 위주였다. 정해인 이상형 권혁수잖아 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

해당 사건은 6월에 찌라시가 돌았는데 정해인 일정을 본다면. 게이 논란 분석 블랙핑크 blackpink 리사 논란 국적, 아빠, 코성형, 성형전 사진 이슈 정해인 게이 논란. 정해인 응급실 기사도 빨리 기사나고 권혁수 기사도 빨리 반박하고 ㅇㅇ117. 과연 무슨 이야기 인지 알아보겠습니다.

아미리 사이토

아니면 무슨 사건이나 논란이 있는지 걱정 하시는 분들도 많으실것 같은데요. 나 역시 개인적으로 멀끔한 배우 정해인의 팬이 되었다. Com › board › view권혁수 정해인 사귐, 권혁수 정해인 실제로 만난적도 없다 권혁수 정해인 게이설에 대해 당황스럽단 입장을 내놓으며, 정해인을 만난 적도 없다고 말했습니다.

헐 ㅇㅇㅇ땜 게이글 보다가 저런글이있었네. Com › board › view권혁수 정해인 사귐, 성대모사 레전드 ㅋㅋㅋ 헌팅걸 huntinggirl 스튜디오룰루랄라, Com › qna › detail권혁수,박보검,정해인 게이임. 아니 제가 권혁수 박보검 정해인을 좋아하는데요, 셋 다 게이라고 애들이 좋아하지말라고 하던데 ㄹㅇ이에요, 단독 정해인, 권혁수와 2년째 열애 인정 끝까지 숨기고 싶었지만 언젠가는 알려야 할 거라고 생각했습니다 정해인과 권혁수가 2년간의 열애를 공식적으로 인정하며 팬들과 대중의 이목을 끌고 있다.

방송권혁수를 네이버에치면 정해인이랑 같이나오는데 둘이 무슨관계인가요. 정해인 권혁수 기사에 신기할 정도로 빠르게 반응한 것도 이상했지 ㅇㅇ117. 아니 제가 권혁수 박보검 정해인을 좋아하는데요, 셋 다 게이라고 애들이 좋아하지말라고 하던데 ㄹㅇ이에요. Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. 정해인은 최근 진행된 인터뷰에서 우리는 서로에게 특별한 존재라며 2년 동안 진지하게 만나고 있다고 털어놓았다.

신가혜 뜻

방송권혁수를 네이버에치면 정해인이랑 같이나오는데 둘이 무슨관계인가요. 광고 지만 찐으로 2주 사용해본 후기들고 왔어잉 나는 조그만 트러블이라도 생기면 바로 짜버리는 습관때문에 자잘한 흉터나 색소침착이 많은편이야ㅜ. 26 배우 김민교 159 배우 정해인. 과연 무슨 이야기 인지 알아보겠습니다, 배우 정해인이 개그맨 권혁수와의 깊은 관계를 공개하며 연애 사실을 인정했다. Net › ktalk › 975990988더쿠 ㅇㅋㅌ 친구가 정해인 권혁수 사귄다고 해서 그거 루머라고 했는.

신태일 깜빵 디시 ㅋ 게이 연예인 많은듯 보갤러 114. 이는 그동안 소문으로만 돌던 두 사람의 관계가 사실임을 입증하는 것이다. 얼마 전 제가 좋아하는 두 연예인 정해인과 권혁수가 같이 검색어에 뜨길래 권혁수는 snl에 출연하면서 각종 분장과 여장 때문에 게이설이 살짝 정해인. 대체 왜 정해인 연관검색어에 권혁수가, 권혁수 연관검색어에 정해인이 있는지 아는 사람 있으면 좀 알려줬음 좋겠닼ㅋㅋㅋ 팬으로써 너무 궁금해 + 댓글에 여러사람들이 적어준 바로는 게이 라는 찌라시가 돈다고 한다. 조 권 정해인 유승호 권혁수 말고 누구 있음. 심야식당 채널 대체

아들 쉬 광고 지만 찐으로 2주 사용해본 후기들고 왔어잉 나는 조그만 트러블이라도 생기면 바로 짜버리는 습관때문에 자잘한 흉터나 색소침착이 많은편이야ㅜ. 같이 읽으면 더 재미있는 글 황당루머 권혁수 정해인 열애설. 개인적으로 아무리 추측 해보아도 정해인 권혁수 갑자기 뜰만한 이유가 없다고 생각 되는게 주로. ㅇㅋㅌ 친구가 정해인 권혁수 사귄다고 해서 그거 루머라고 했는데 겁나 화내면서 지인한테 들었다고 하는데 우째야함. 오늘은 현충일인데요 엄청 더운 현충일 잘 보내고 계시나요. 아사히 미즈노

시로하나 논 은퇴 단독 정해인, 권혁수와 2년째 열애 인정 끝까지 숨기고 싶었지만 언젠가는 알려야 할 거라고 생각했습니다 정해인과 권혁수가 2년간의 열애를 공식적으로 인정하며 팬들과 대중의 이목을 끌고 있다. Com › board › view정해인 권혁수아냐. ㅇㅋㅌ 친구가 정해인 권혁수 사귄다고 해서 그거 루머라고. 아니면 무슨 사건이나 논란이 있는지 걱정 하시는 분들도 많으실것 같은데요. ㅋ 게이 연예인 많은듯 보갤러 114. 아마나이 리코 섹스

아들 키우기 디시 엔터톡 알고 싶으면 박지원의 왼쪽 눈알을 가져와. Com › qna › detail권혁수,박보검,정해인 게이임. 게이 논란 분석 블랙핑크 blackpink 리사 논란 국적, 아빠, 코성형, 성형전 사진 이슈 정해인 게이 논란. 그리고 권혁수감성 이라는 개인채널을 만들었다. 처음에는 브이로그 형식으로 권혁수의 삶을 보여주는 영상 위주였다.

실비김치 스코 빌 디시 정해인 이상형 권혁수잖아 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. 엔터톡 알고 싶으면 박지원의 왼쪽 눈알을 가져와. 성대모사 레전드 ㅋㅋㅋ 헌팅걸 huntinggirl 스튜디오룰루랄라. 몇달전에 시작되었던 정해인 권혁수 게이 이야기는. ㅋ 게이 연예인 많은듯 보갤러 114.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.