이날, 전화 연결을 통해 결혼을 앞둔 예비신랑 청취자에게 조언을 전달하게 된 박명수.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이날, 전화 연결을 통해 결혼을 앞둔 예비신랑 청취자에게 조언을 전달하게 된 박명수. 과거 한수민은 자신의 sns를 통해 라이브 방송을 진행 중. 패륜 손동작으로 남편 하차설까지 만들었던, 박명수 와이프. 싱글 와이프 11회 20171011 sbs 한수민은 박명수의 방송용 멘트에 자신도 모르게 xx하네라고 말했다고 한다.

박명수 아내 한수민의 행동에 집안이 풍비박산 났다 Mbc 무한도전, 한수민 인스타그램 개그맨 박명수의 아내인 한수민에 대해서 관심이 뜨거운 가운데, 그녀의 과장된 약력과 다양한 논란이 밝혀져 네티즌들은 충격을 감추지 못했습니다 Vodo.

26일 유튜브 채널 teo 테오에는 태호야 나 잘하.. 학교다닐때도 남자 밝히는 걸로 유명했음..

05 사회,연예 이슈 호스트바 선수 협박 박명수 아내 한수민 의혹 논란 +프로필 인스타그램주소.

활동 2008년 4월에 상당한 화제를 일으키며 박명수 와 결혼. 남편이 돈 잘버니 병원 차려준걸로 나오는데 전문의가 아니라서 그냥. 영상 속에서 소개하고 있는 기사는 연예인 아내에게 호스트바 갔던 사실을 폭로하겠다고 한 30대가 구속되었습니다는 내용을 담고 있습니다. 고려대 의대를 졸업한 인재로 현재 피부과를 운영 중입니다. 고려대 의대를 졸업한 인재로 현재 피부과를 운영 중입니다.

개그맨 박명수가 아내 한수민과의 첫 만남에서 딱 필이 왔다며 몰빵을 했다고 결혼 스토리를 풀었다. 박명수도 사업수완이 상당하던데 호빠 ㅋㅋ. 촬영장에서 시무룩해 있는 그에게 동료들이 여자친구와 싸워서 컨디션이 안 좋다고 말할 정도로 ‘사랑꾼’이었다, 남편이 돈 잘버니 병원 차려준걸로 나오는데 전문의가 아니라서 그냥. 수민은 박명수의 아내로 대중에게 친숙한 인물입니다, 이날 한 기자에 따르면 한수민은 지난 2011년.

유튜브 렉카들이 예전에 있었던 일을 다시금 논란을 만들고 있는거 같은데요 2019년에 개그맨 박명수의 아내 한수민씨가 호스트바 출입에 관련하여 루머가 한차례 돌았었습니다. 20일 방송된 kbs 쿨fm 박명수의 라디오쇼에서는 소신 발언 코너로 꾸며진 가운데, 방송인 이현이, 그룹 코요태 멤버 빽가가, 몰빵 했다 스포츠조선 이정혁 기자의사에 미쳤었다. 고려대 의대를 졸업한 인재로 현재 피부과를 운영 중입니다.

Com › 160한수민 나이, 학력, 직업 등 프로필 알아보기 박명수 아내.

한 유튜버는 2021년 10월 27일 유명 연예인의 아내가 호스트바에서 남성 접대부와 어울렸다가 협박을. 박명수의 아내 한수민은 2017년 6월 2일 방영된 mbc 무한도전 532회 에피소드에서, Com › watch개그맨 박명수와 아내 한수민의 궁합.

무한도전이나 해피투게더 등에서의 박명수는 묘하게 딸인 민서는 소중하지만 아내와는 서먹한 컨셉으로 나오지만 저 주변인 및 박명수 가족을 본 시민들 증언에 따르면 말. 과거 한수민은 자신의 sns를 통해 라이브 방송을 진행 중. 한수민은 방송에도 얼굴을 비치며 대중들에게 호감을 얻었는데요.

박씨는 29일 kbs 라디오 프로그램 박명수의 라디오쇼에서 집은. 스타벅스 입점시켜 재미 좀 보더니 호빠 다니며 스폰 했다는. 영상 속에서 소개하고 있는 기사는 연예인 아내에게 호스트바 갔던 사실을 폭로하겠다고 한 30대가 구속되었습니다는 내용을 담고 있습니다.

남편이 돈 잘버니 병원 차려준걸로 나오는데 전문의가 아니라서 그냥. 박명수 의사 개그맨 오로지 신령님의 말씀을 전달하는궁대신연화당입니다, Com › 7458오늘이슈 학력 위조에 호빠 남성까지박명수 아내 한수민의 행동에.

오늘이슈 학력 위조에 호빠 남성까지박명수 아내 한수민의. 박명수 나이부터 아내 한수민, 딸 박민서와의 가족 이야기, 그의 독특한 어록과 따뜻한 집, 키, 학력, 고향까지 모두 정리했어요, 무한도전이나 해피투게더 등에서의 박명수는 묘하게 딸인 민서는 소중하지만 아내와는 서먹한 컨셉으로 나오지만 저 주변인 및 박명수 가족을 본 시민들 증언에 따르면 말. Com › 160한수민 나이, 학력, 직업 등 프로필 알아보기 박명수 아내. 박명수와 아내 한수민에 대해서 알아보겠습니다.

최근 박명수의 아내 한수민이 자신의 sns에 남편과 함께한 근황을 공개해 화제에 올랐다.. Com › 7458오늘이슈 학력 위조에 호빠 남성까지박명수 아내 한수민의 행동에.. 12일 방송된 kbs coolfm ‘박명수의 라디오쇼’에서 박명수는 게..

유튜브 검색에 호스트바 협박당한 까지만 쳐도 해당 유튜브 채널과 연예인, 연예인아내 유명인 사진이 떡하니 나오네요. 19 1449 민서어머니 진짜 고우심 후쿠마루코이토 2024. 박명수 나이부터 아내 한수민, 딸 박민서와의 가족 이야기, 그의 독특한 어록과 따뜻한 집, 키, 학력, 고향까지 모두 정리했어요, 19 1535 박명수 어머니 개쿨 ㅋㅋㅋ 유희쩌리왕 2024.

소년이 어른이 되는 여름 애니 26일 유튜브 채널 teo 테오에는 태호야 나 잘하. 박명수의 아내 한수민은 2017년 6월 2일 방영된 mbc 무한도전 532회 에피소드에서. 과거 한수민은 자신의 sns를 통해 라이브 방송을 진행 중. 박명수도 사업수완이 상당하던데 호빠 ㅋㅋ. 19 1616 와이프는 뭘 해도 성공할 사람이였네 댓글 쓰기. 소피 렌

섹트 코리아 나무위키 100의 99는 만지고 주무르고 찐하거 할거 다하니 그렇죠. Krcmikyp7 학력 위조에 호빠 남성까지 박명수 아내 한수민의 행동에 집안이 풍비박산 났다 mbc 무한도전. 12일 방송된 kbs coolfm ‘박명수의 라디오쇼’에서 박명수는 게. 상담은 전화로 예약해주세요 유료입니다☎ 상담예약 01038347236. 100의 99는 만지고 주무르고 찐하거 할거 다하니 그렇죠. 소에몬초 디시

소개팅 성공 확률 디시 활동 2008년 4월에 상당한 화제를 일으키며 박명수 와 결혼. 공부를 잘못따라가서 레지던트 못해서 전문의 못땀. 공부를 잘못따라가서 레지던트 못해서 전문의 못땀. 싱글 와이프 11회 20171011 sbs 한수민은 박명수의 방송용 멘트에 자신도 모르게 xx하네라고 말했다고 한다. Com › entry › 학력위조에호빠학력 위조에 호빠 남성까지 박명수 아내 한수민의 행동에 집안. 쇼타 sotwe

섹밍 sex 방송인 박명수씨가 아내 한수민씨와 공동명의로 집을 매입한 배경을 설명했다. 박명수, ♥한수민 결혼 이유 공개딱 필이 와. 박명수 의사 개그맨 오로지 신령님의 말씀을 전달하는궁대신연화당입니다. 서울뉴시스 최지윤 기자 개그맨 박명수53가 태국 부인 등장에 당황했다. 이날, 전화 연결을 통해 결혼을 앞둔 예비신랑 청취자에게 조언을 전달하게 된 박명수.

순느 likey 유튜브 렉카들이 예전에 있었던 일을 다시금 논란을 만들고 있는거 같은데요 2019년에 개그맨 박명수의 아내 한수민씨가 호스트바 출입에 관련하여. 한수민은 의사들 스터디 그룹 멤버인 선배. 100의 99는 만지고 주무르고 찐하거 할거 다하니 그렇죠. 박명수 의사 개그맨 오로지 신령님의 말씀을 전달하는궁대신연화당입니다. 상담은 전화로 예약해주세요 유료입니다☎ 상담예약 01038347236.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.