라디오스타 13일 방송 서울뉴스1 박하나 기자 배우 천정명이 라디오스타에서 악마 조교로 불리던 군 시절을 전했다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Likes, tiktok video from jeter shells @jetershells. 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 mbc 라디오스타 캡처 서울뉴스1 박하나 기자 배우 천정명이 라디오스타에서 악마 조교로 불리던 군 시절을 전했다. 어떤 환자분은 자기가 꼭 나아서 조교가 되어주겠다고 했다. Net664614358 개드립으로 69 붐업 2.

대대장님이랑 중대장님이 네가 천사 조교처럼 훈련병들을 조교로서 잘 가르쳐준다면 더 많은 팬이.

Son original versevision.. 북한산 삼천사계곡길로 문수봉 오르기안전산행 120 230916.. Com › @nova › videonova reacts on tiktok.. 천정명은 처음에는 악마 조교를 할 생각은 없었다..

본 조교 여러분이 하는 행동에 따라 천사가 될 수도 악마가 될 수도 있습니다.

89 Likes, Tiktok Video From Ragnar De Wish 🤪 @ragnardewishhhh Pourtoi.

24 2030 관등성명 알려주는 천사 조교.. 톱갤문학,주의 천사의악마 만화 reze 2025..

Ai 훈련조교가 된 전문직 뉴노멀실리콘밸리.

톱갤문학,주의 천사의악마 만화 reze 2025. 아내가 오늘 저를 병실에 대기 조교로 임명했습니다. 엎드려를 제일많이 한것 같습니다 ㅠㅠ 그대쉴꽃 ip 61. 💙💛 ручнаробота ручнароботаназамовлення символікаукраїни ручнеткацтво брелоки славаукраїні🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 дякуюзсузановийдень💙💛 insumosdepestañasonce2026, Net664614358 개드립으로 69 붐업 2. Original sound girlslovechrome.

Jpg 본 조교는 천사가 될수도 잇고.

Який варіант вам більше до душі. 천정명은 서글서글한 인상과 부드러운 미소가 인상적인 배우인데요. 한명철 목사 학습 교관과 조교들 그리고 강의 현장. 육군 army 정병육성_조교 독사조교_.

음핵 아하 전남 진도군 부부 애플망고 대표님들을 만나 뵙고 왔습니다. 천정명은 처음에는 악마 조교를 할 생각은 없었다. 라디오스타 13일 방송 배우 천정명이 라디오스타에서 악마 조교로 불리던 군 시절을 전했다. This how ur family and friends look at ur post but never push like 🤦🏽‍♀️original sound romalistheactor. 산행에서 휴식은 절대 중요하다 2시간여 산행길을 쉬지 않는 것은. 유튜브 뮤직 알고리즘 초기화

이마나가 사나 디시 김일태 아내가 오늘 저를 병실에 대기 조교로 임명했습니다. 家长分享了女儿两年来的进步和转变，真挚的分享好令人鼓舞, 😇🥰 qdees kindergarten preschool qdeesstarters qdeeskids 幼儿园 蒲种幼儿园 marciaimperatorgorda 천사조교시간이다아키 注意看，它叫液态磨石，可以把水泥地面变成大理石的效果地面地面改造. 서울에서 4시간 반정도 떨어진 거리 전라남도 진도에 위치한 애플망고 전문 농장 아망뜨팜에 다녀왔습니다. 부모님과 헤어지기전수류탄 훈련마지막 헤어지는날. 1990년대 후반부터 배우로 활동을 이어오던 천정명은 2008년 영화 헨젤과 그레텔 이후 현역으로 입대하여. 이라스토야 인형

유쿠하시 데리헤루 Tiktok video from 霹雳海洋🌊 @hhy000712 美甲展示fyp. 전남 진도군 부부 애플망고 대표님들을 만나 뵙고 왔습니다. 보통은 비결수나 진정한 보물을 얻기 전까지는 자주 애용한다. 라디오스타 13일 방송 배우 천정명이 라디오스타에서 악마 조교로 불리던 군 시절을 전했다. 24 2030 관등성명 알려주는 천사 조교. 이동진 한줄평 레전드 디시

윤슬 벗방 1990년대 후반부터 배우로 활동을 이어오던 천정명은 2008년 영화 헨젤과 그레텔 이후 현역으로 입대하여. 지혜자들을 도와 영들의 진리와 사랑이 진작되도록 돕는 조교 역할의 천사들이 있는데 그들은 특히 학습 속도가 부진한 영들 곁에서 실제적인 도움을. 무엇보다 안전한 신병교육을 위해 그들은 매일 훈련병들 보다 먼저 일어나고, 더 늦게 잠자리에 들어야 합니다. 이번 천정명 라디오스타 출연은 16년이라는 긴 기다림이 전혀 아깝지 않을 만큼 풍성한 이야기들로 가득했습니다. 서오릉 봄소풍날로부터 약 15일이 지난 어느날, 숙명여대 교수실에서 강의 시작 시간을 기다리고 앉아 있는 나에게 정외과의 조교가 세 통의 편지를 가지고 왔다.

유해 위험화학물질 취급에 대한 설명으로 거리가 먼 것은 부모님과 헤어지기전수류탄 훈련마지막 헤어지는날. 암환자에게 봉사할 천사1004를 찾습니다. Com › @jetershells › videojeter shells @jetershells’s videos with original sound. Com › @hhy000712 › video美甲展示fyp tiktok. 그런 나날이 지긋지긋하여, 상사가 없는 세계로.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.