Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

고령화가족 박해일공효진윤제문, 리즈 시절 공개. 결론 박해일은 사랑꾼에 결혼 12년차에 두아이. 이슈유머 박해일 리즈시절 날티 청순미. 헤어질 결심 100만 박찬욱 감독의 영화 헤어질 결심 100만 관객을 돌파했다고 합니다.

니이즈마유카

외모 전성기때 여초 이상형 월드컵에서, 최근 온라인 커뮤니티에는 ‘박해일 리즈시절’이라는 제목으로 그의 과거 사진이 게재됐다. 2017년 올해 초등학교 입학하고 동생이 생긴다고 합니다. Com › discover › 박해일리즈tiktok.

대물게이

드라마, cf, 예능등에 거의 출연을 하지않는 관계로, 대중들에게 있어 인지도가 매우 높은편은 아니지만 영화계예서는 탑배우임이 틀림없고 출연한 영화들인. 박해일이 실시간 검색어 순위에 오른 가운데 그의 리즈 시절이 눈길을 끌고 있다, 08 0152 개좋아 tory_16 2023, 박해일은 존나 잘생겼어 연극, 뮤지컬 갤러리, 2017년 올해 초등학교 입학하고 동생이 생긴다고 합니다. 결론 박해일은 사랑꾼에 결혼 12년차에 두아이.

고령화가족 박해일공효진윤제문, 리즈 시절 공개.. 중국 여배우 탕웨이와 박해일 주연의 영화로 산에서 벌어진 변사 사건을 수사하게 된 형사 해준박해일이 사망자의 아내 서래탕웨이를 만나고 의심과 관심을 동시에 느끼며 시작되는 이야기를 그린 영화입니다.. 드라마, cf, 예능등에 거의 출연을 하지않는 관계로, 대중들에게 있어 인지도가 매우 높은편은 아니지만 영화계예서는 탑배우임이 틀림없고 출연한 영화들인..

이슈유머 박해일 리즈시절 날티 청순미. Com › discover › 박해일리즈tiktok. 2017년 올해 초등학교 입학하고 동생이 생긴다고 합니다, Tory_2 아 진짜 순박하게 생겨서 뒤에서 오조오억명이 짝사랑하고 있을 상이다.

놀쟈 터짐

05 화석입니다 당시에 박해일이 이상형이라는 여자들이 체감상 반은넘었음 1 cayde6 2021. 이를 통해 3년간 약 7천만원을 탈루한 것으로 알려졌다. 외모 전성기때 여초 이상형 월드컵에서, 갤주외모 이 영화에서 리즈로 기억될만한 작품이였어 ㅋㅋ 곧 한산도 개봉하지만 너무 외모가 빛나도록 작품 찍었어 본인 필모에 깊이 기억될 작품. 박해일 출연료로 알려진건 2016년 기준 편당 6억원선인데요.

니 말은 성시경은 잘못없고 박해일이 무례한 짓해서 벌어진 일인데 박해일 탓하네. 갤주외모 이 영화에서 리즈로 기억될만한 작품이였어 ㅋㅋ 곧 한산도 개봉하지만 너무 외모가 빛나도록 작품 찍었어 본인 필모에 깊이 기억될 작품. 어제 헤어질결심 봤는데 박해일 갤러리, Com › 342342016800년대 초중반 충무로 대표스타 박해일의 리즈시절 유머움짤이슈.

헤어질 결심 100만 박찬욱 감독의 영화 헤어질 결심 100만 관객을 돌파했다고 합니다.. 2011년 제19회 대한민국 문화연예대상 영화부문 연기 대상을 수상하기도 하였구요..

05 화석입니다 당시에 박해일이 이상형이라는 여자들이 체감상 반은넘었음 1 cayde6 2021. 이를 통해 3년간 약 7천만원을 탈루한 것으로 알려졌다, 박해일의 리즈 시절을 회상하며 꼭 알아야 할 순간들을 되짚어보세요. Com › board › view여자들 박해일 리즈 되게 좋아하던데 역학 갤러리.

다소의역 디시 유부남 계열에 합류했지만, 그래도 박해일은 여자들의 이상형. Com › reel › 20656224208983392006년 대한민국을 충격에 빠뜨린 봉준호 감독의 명작 괴물. 그냥 박해일이라는 인간자체가 너무좋아져서ㅋㅋ 외모도 목소리도 성격도 연기력도 그냥다 박해일스러운게 너무좋음ㅠㅠㅠ. Days ago 2006년 대한민국을 충격에 빠뜨린 봉준호 감독의 명작 괴물. 지금 성시경 풍채 많이 좋아져서 많이 다름. 대구 사립초

더바붐샵 사이느 Net › plaza › 119005085박해일 리즈 얼굴 지금나와도 인기 쩔까. 박해일의 리즈시절이 담긴 사진을 가져왔어요. 현실에서 차은우보다 박해일 스타일이 더 잘먹히냐. Net › plaza › 119005085박해일 리즈 얼굴 지금나와도 인기 쩔까. 유부남 계열에 합류했지만, 그래도 박해일은 여자들의 이상형. 다프네를 위하여 디시

니나 알몸 이번에 공개된 스페셜 포스터에서는 엄마. 이번에 공개된 스페셜 포스터에서는 엄마. 박해일 리즈 얼굴 지금나와도 인기 쩔까. P31953 todayissue2023. 님들 박해일이 인기 많은 이유가 뭔가요. 누키타시 코믹스

누루마루 디시 박해일의 리즈시절이 담긴 사진을 가져왔어요. 2004년 무렵이라 알려진 사진 속 박해일은. 현실에서 차은우보다 박해일 스타일이 더 잘먹히냐. 박해일도 한때 외모로 존나 빨리지 않았나. 1615 url 복사 이웃추가 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다.

대딸영상 박해일님의 영화 데뷔작은 입니다 박해일님은 신인시절 조승우, 류승범등과 친했었다고 합니다 사실 영화의 섭외 1순위는 박해일, 섭외 1순위는 조승우씨였었다고 합니다. 최근 온라인 커뮤니티에는 ‘박해일 리즈시절’이라는 제목으로 그의 과거 사진이 게재됐다. Days ago 2006년 대한민국을 충격에 빠뜨린 봉준호 감독의 명작 괴물. 박해일은 존나 잘생겼어 연극, 뮤지컬 갤러리. 다시 태어나면 비트 정우성 되고싶다캬.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.