US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 8, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 8, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 8, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 8, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 8, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 8, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 8, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 8, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 8, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 8, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 8, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 8, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 8, 2026.
Tvgivemecs 🧡youtube syoutube. 미츄 친구로서의 미녕이와 방송 캐릭터로서의 미녕이를 확실히 구분하고 있으며, 동일. 버츄얼 스나 미녕이 나이 2021년 세는나이로 28살. 저번에 미츄 콘서트에서도 미녕이 진짜 존나이쁘네 이거말고 딱히 중계없었는데 오늘보니까 진짜 텐션이 버튜버중에 압도적인 미친년에 알고보니까 이주인이랑 한달차이인 씹원로중에 원로네.
| 동생하고 대화하는 바이브 보니까 나이차이 절대 많이 안나는 남매같은데수능썰 푸는거보면 미녕이 실제 나이는 20대 중반 많아봤자 후반 정도일듯. | 과거부터 반캠 방송으로 출중한 실물 몸매를 공개하며 빨간약으로 화제를 모았던 둥그레는 이날 방송에서도 과감한 의상으로 명품 몸매와 제로투, 삐끼 read more. | 이 세아스토리가 특이한게 1기 2기 이런식으로 해서. | Com › community › board버튜버 미녕이 팬들이 확실히 나이가 좀 많은듯. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Com@givemecs 💚fan cafe scafe. | 미녕이 나이 교차검증 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. | 미츄 친구로서의 미녕이와 방송 캐릭터로서의 미녕이를 확실히 구분하고 있으며, 동일. | 미녕이 나이가 ㄹㅇ 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. |
| 21년도 미녕이 보던애들은 대충 2627살쯤인거 알거임. | 미녕이 나이 오해하는이유가 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. | Com › mini › board미츄 나이 정리 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. | 미녕이 실물은 확정이죠 뭐jpg ㅂㅈㅁ118. |
| Com › mini › board요새 미녕이인가 걔 괜찮던데 몇살이냐 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. | 미녕이 실물은 확정이죠 뭐jpg ㅂㅈㅁ118. | 미녕이 97이라고 본다 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. | Com › community › board버튜버 미녕이데려오깨 최신근황feat 취업. |
9597 세아때 막내 티모 까먹95아님97 25. 이 세아스토리가 특이한게 1기 2기 이런식으로 해서, 21년도에 세아스토리 방송하는데 이년 30살이라고 드립친데서 퍼진거고. 며칠전 세아갤에서 흑화육수가 닉네임 퍼트림세아는 롤 좋아함미녕이는 롤 하루종일 하던 스트리머였음세아 과장이랑 점프킹 대전 예고됐을때 미녕이 방송에서 점프킹 하면서 해야하는 이유가 있어서 한다고 함휴방사유중 회사방송. 미녕이는 미녕이로 활동중에 세아 mk3로 활동했었음 아침엔 세아스토리 저녁엔 미녕이 본인으로 얼마전에 세아스토리가 공식적인 졸업을 선언하여서 지금처럼 시원하게 다 말할수있는듯 댓글로 가기 61 수호자 2025.
미녕이는 미녕이로 활동중에 세아 mk3로 활동했었음 아침엔 세아스토리 저녁엔 미녕이 본인으로 얼마전에 세아스토리가 공식적인 졸업을 선언하여서 지금처럼 시원하게 다 말할수있는듯 댓글로 가기 61 수호자 2025.. 그냥 나이 많다고 생각해라 92든 97이든 30대인데.. 저번에 미츄 콘서트에서도 미녕이 진짜 존나이쁘네 이거말고 딱히 중계없었는데 오늘보니까 진짜 텐션이 버튜버중에 압도적인 미친년에 알고보니까 이주인이랑 한달차이인 씹원로중에 원로네.. Com › mini › board미츄 나이 정리 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리..
미녕이 나이가 ㄹㅇ 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. 3년전 영상 보니까 목소리 존내 이쁘네. 미녕님 나이 검색하다가 나오던데 들어보니깐 전혀 다른 인물인것 같은데 동일인물인가요. 92부터 99까지 말이 다 다르노그냥 대충 반으로 나눠서95년생 네무랑 동급취급 하면 되는거냐.
미녕이 나이 교차검증 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. 갑자기 생각난건데 동생 수능본다고 1주일 휴방인데10살 차이네. Redirecting to sgall. 하나같이 말하길 방송과 오프라인에서 하는 행동이 똑같다라고, 고인은 20대 중반이라는 젊은 나이에 비투명세포 신장암 4기라는 희귀 암 진단을 받았습니다, 정상인이 없기로 유명한 미츄 내에서도 비정상인 도라이 순위 상위권의 강자로 평가받는다.
9293 미녕이93 마젯94 부쿠키95 세노96 앵보 이오몽 하지유98 위도 모아99 김루야 오요 초깨비02 아쿠루가민이랑 캐니 아는사람 댓좀, 방송일이 그녀석 생일이네탭 애매해서 그냥 빨간약에 넣음. 💛프로필💛name 미녕이 birthday 1월 14일height 154cm 💙태그💙 live tag 녕녕이 art tag 미녕이그려오깨 💜twitch stwitch. 💛프로필💛name 미녕이 birthday 1월 14일height 154cm 💙태그💙 live tag 녕녕이 art tag 미녕이그려오깨 💜twitch stwitch. 과거부터 반캠 방송으로 출중한 실물 몸매를 공개하며 빨간약으로 화제를 모았던 둥그레는 이날 방송에서도 과감한 의상으로 명품 몸매와 제로투, 삐끼 read more. 21년도 미녕이 보던애들은 대충 2627살쯤인거 알거임.
234 투배럭은 mk3 데뷔한 직후로도 계속 돌아가도 있었음 다만 미녕이 쪽이건 세스건 멀티 언급은 금지 사항이라 굳이 찾아보지 않으면 알 수 없었을 뿐 mk2도 주 4회 개인방송 돌리고 있고 2022.. 일반 미녕이 나이 2021년 세는나이로 28살..
Comgivemecsplz 💛오시마크🌙 ⭐fan name 애솔단. 갑자기 생각난건데 동생 수능본다고 1주일 휴방인데10살 차이네. 234 투배럭은 mk3 데뷔한 직후로도 계속 돌아가도 있었음 다만 미녕이 쪽이건 세스건 멀티 언급은 금지 사항이라 굳이 찾아보지 않으면 알 수 없었을 뿐 mk2도 주 4회 개인방송 돌리고 있고 2022, 트위치 스트리머 미녕이데려오깨 의 2025년 방송 기록을 정리한 문서이다. 미츄 친구로서의 미녕이와 방송 캐릭터로서의 미녕이를 확실히 구분하고 있으며, 동일, 고대 미녕견들이 기록해놨네이제 26년이니까 5살 더하면됨 만나이면 4살.
팬더 루아 미녕이는 미녕이로 활동중에 세아 mk3로 활동했었음 아침엔 세아스토리 저녁엔 미녕이 본인으로 얼마전에 세아스토리가 공식적인 졸업을 선언하여서 지금처럼 시원하게 다 말할수있는듯 댓글로 가기 61 수호자 2025. Tvgivemecs 🧡youtube syoutube. 미녕이 실물은 확정이죠 뭐jpg ㅂㅈㅁ118. 미녕이는 미녕이로 활동중에 세아 mk3로 활동했었음 아침엔 세아스토리 저녁엔 미녕이 본인으로 얼마전에 세아스토리가 공식적인 졸업을 선언하여서 지금처럼 시원하게 다 말할수있는듯 댓글로 가기 61 수호자 2025. 234 투배럭은 mk3 데뷔한 직후로도 계속 돌아가도 있었음 다만 미녕이 쪽이건 세스건 멀티 언급은 금지 사항이라 굳이 찾아보지 않으면 알 수 없었을 뿐 mk2도 주 4회 개인방송 돌리고 있고 2022. 폰헙 대체 디시
푸딩 올노 아직도 미녕이 나이갖고 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. 디시 21년 게시물에서 28근 22년 게시물에서 28방송중 실수로 깠다 21년에 28인게 정배 같음. 9293 미녕이93 마젯94 부쿠키95 세노96 앵보 이오몽 하지유98 위도 모아99 김루야 오요 초깨비02 아쿠루가민이랑 캐니 아는사람 댓좀. 미녕이 나이 오해하는이유가 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. 9597 세아때 막내 티모 까먹95아님97 25. 팬더클래스 우유대전
펨돔 히라 Com › community › board버튜버 미녕이데려오깨 최신근황feat 취업. 갑자기 생각난건데 동생 수능본다고 1주일 휴방인데10살 차이네. Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. Com › community › board버튜버 미녕이데려오깨 최신근황feat 취업. 버츄얼 스나 미녕이 나이 2021년 세는나이로 28살. 팬더티비 아지
포켓로그 클래식 티어표 2025 미녕이 나이 교차검증 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. 미츄 친구로서의 미녕이와 방송 캐릭터로서의 미녕이를 확실히 구분하고 있으며, 동일. 며칠전 세아갤에서 흑화육수가 닉네임 퍼트림세아는 롤 좋아함미녕이는 롤 하루종일 하던 스트리머였음세아 과장이랑 점프킹 대전 예고됐을때 미녕이 방송에서 점프킹 하면서 해야하는 이유가 있어서 한다고 함휴방사유중 회사방송. Com › mini › board요새 미녕이인가 걔 괜찮던데 몇살이냐 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. 트위치 스트리머 미녕이데려오깨 의 2025년 방송 기록을 정리한 문서이다.
폰허브 2025 쿼카 만지면 벌금이라는데 그래도 너무 귀엽다. 며칠전 세아갤에서 흑화육수가 닉네임 퍼트림세아는 롤 좋아함미녕이는 롤 하루종일 하던 스트리머였음세아 과장이랑 점프킹 대전 예고됐을때 미녕이 방송에서 점프킹 하면서 해야하는 이유가 있어서 한다고 함휴방사유중 회사방송. 21년도 미녕이 보던애들은 대충 2627살쯤인거 알거임. 234 투배럭은 mk3 데뷔한 직후로도 계속 돌아가도 있었음 다만 미녕이 쪽이건 세스건 멀티 언급은 금지 사항이라 굳이 찾아보지 않으면 알 수 없었을 뿐 mk2도 주 4회 개인방송 돌리고 있고 2022. 정상인이 없기로 유명한 미츄 내에서도 비정상인 도라이 순위 상위권의 강자로 평가받는다.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 8, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 8, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 8, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 8, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
정작 미녕이 본인은 자신은 중위권 밖에 안된다고 주장하고 있다., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.