Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

훈훈수산 양념순살게장 후기 집에서 순살게장 사먹어 보는 건 기억하는 경우로는 2번째인데요. Prologue blog map library guest 냠냠냠냠 p 185개의 글 목록열기. 옥이네보다 훈훈수산 양념게장이 저한테는 더 맛있더라고요. 새우는 아르헨티나 홍새우, 관자 크기 좋구요, 냉동 옥수수인데 달달하고 식감도 좋아요.

훈훈수산 보일링 씨푸드 밀키트를 봤는데, 너무 맛있어 보여서 결국 충동구매.. 게다가 대한민국 수산대전 쿠폰이벤트로 2kg에 45,840원에 겟했어요 완전 이득.. 게다가 대한민국 수산대전 쿠폰이벤트로 2kg에 45,840원에 겟했어요 완전 이득..

박단아 라방

바키 따먹어버린다

방콕원스어폰어타이마사지

Com › entry › 훈훈수산순살게장훈훈수산 순살게장 먹어본 후기, Com › semm2 › 221885129384훈훈수산 깐새우장 양념간장 300g 내돈내산 후기 네이버 블로그, 1봉지에 5060마리 정도 들어있어요.

발목 인대 파열 군대 디시

바로 저녁에 먹으려고 냉장실에 보관을 했습니다. 양념 순살게장 한통에 300g 미개봉 상태에서는 냉동도 가능하다, ㅋㅋ 가격은 34,110원에 구매했습니다.

Com › hunhunsusan스토어 홈 톡딜. Com › parkja09 › 223944533397훈훈수산 보일링 씨푸드 후기 네이버 블로그. 소시지나 다른 토핑을 더하면 더 많은 인원이 먹을 수 있을거에요. 훈훈수산 국산 자포니카 민물장어를 먹어보게 되었는데요 냄새도 하나도 안나고 넘나 맛나서 깜놀. 보일링씨푸드는 해산물과 채소를 넣고 양념에 섞어서 먹는 미국식 해물찜인데요, 만드는 방법이 굉장히 간단하고 맛있었습니다ㅎㅎ비주얼 보세요. Com › entry › 훈훈수산순살게장훈훈수산 순살게장 먹어본 후기.

양념 순살게장 한통에 300g 미개봉 상태에서는 냉동도 가능하다. 878 followers, 1,324 following, 43 posts 훈훈수산 @hunhunsta on instagram 수산물 no, 1봉지에 5060마리 정도 들어있어요. 장갑도 들어 있어서 편하게 먹을 수 있다.

Com › entry › 훈훈수산훈훈수산 보일링 씨푸드 밀키트 솔직 후기. 옥이네보다 훈훈수산 양념게장이 저한테는 더 맛있더라고요. 훈훈수산 보일링 씨푸드 밀키트를 봤는데, 너무 맛있어 보여서 결국 충동구매.

박을때 느낌 디시

이건 못참지 양념새우 바로 꺼내서 계란후라이 하나 만들고 양념새우장 슥 비벼서 한그릇 뚝딱했습니다 꿀맛. 훈훈수산 국산 자포니카 민물장어를 먹어보게 되었는데요 냄새도 하나도 안나고 넘나 맛나서 깜놀, Com › entry › 훈훈수산훈훈수산 보일링 씨푸드 밀키트 솔직 후기.

박사방 샘플 878 followers, 1,324 following, 43 posts 훈훈수산 @hunhunsta on instagram 수산물 no. 소시지나 다른 토핑을 더하면 더 많은 인원이 먹을 수 있을거에요. 훈훈수산 순살 게장 게장은 신선도가 생명이기에 안전하게 오길바라면서 아이스팩 추가 +400원 간장, 양념 두개를 다 시켜봤다. 백돈이 10번 먹고 가져온 순살게장 구매하기 ssmartstore. 매콤 달달 고자극이라 맛있게 먹었다 ㅎㅎ 해산물 양도 많고 23인분이라 엄청 배부르게. 방귀챈

방귀짤 월드컵 미국 현지의 맛을 그대로 담은 보일링 씨푸드 밀키트. 간장새우는 사실 제 스타일이 아니였어요ㅜㅜ 맛은 있는데 양념보다는 사실 좀 비린편 양념은 비린맛이 하나도 안 났는데 간장새우는 조금 비린맛이. 훈훈수산 맛있게 매콤하고 감칠맛이 가득한 보일링 씨푸드를 만나보세요. 훈훈수산 순살 게장 게장은 신선도가 생명이기에 안전하게 오길바라면서 아이스팩 추가 +400원 간장, 양념 두개를 다 시켜봤다. 훈훈수산 양념순살게장 후기 집에서 순살게장 사먹어 보는 건 기억하는 경우로는 2번째인데요. 백만송희 결혼 디시

배 혜지 수북 좌 Weve brought you koreas 1 rice thief, boneless crab. 보일링씨푸드는 해산물과 채소를 넣고 양념에 섞어서 먹는 미국식 해물찜인데요, 만드는 방법이 굉장히 간단하고 맛있었습니다ㅎㅎ비주얼 보세요. 훈훈수산 국산 자포니카 민물장어를 먹어보게 되었는데요 냄새도 하나도 안나고 넘나 맛나서 깜놀. 게다가 대한민국 수산대전 쿠폰이벤트로 2kg에 45,840원에 겟했어요 완전 이득. 포텐 g마켓 열빙어 훈훈 알이가득찬 시사모 특대 1kg. 방귀 영상 디시

박솔이 합본 옥이네보다 훈훈수산 양념게장이 저한테는 더 맛있더라고요. 얜 뭐 따로 조리할 필요없이 그냥 굽기 read more. Weve brought you koreas 1 rice thief, boneless crab. 미국 현지의 맛을 그대로 담은 보일링 씨푸드 밀키트. 훈훈수산 국산 자포니카 민물장어를 먹어보게 되었는데요 냄새도 하나도 안나고 넘나 맛나서 깜놀.

바퀜 디시 매콤 달달 고자극이라 맛있게 먹었다 ㅎㅎ 해산물 양도 많고 23인분이라 엄청 배부르게. 얜 뭐 따로 조리할 필요없이 그냥 굽기 read more. 양념은 그냥 무난한 새우장이었고, 매운양념 새우장은 재구매할 의사 200%로 만들만큼 찐 존맛. 1봉지에 5060마리 정도 들어있어요. 내돈내산 인증 및 구매처 정보 내돈내산 인증 쇼핑 훈훈수산 보일링 씨푸드 쉬림프 밀키트 미국식 해물찜 보일링크랩 선택 훈훈 보일링.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.