Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

하이큐 331화 개인적인 후기 네이버 블로그. 그래서 아카아시는 무슨소리냐고묻자, 보쿠토는. 사쿠사_키요오미 오이카와_토오루 아카아시_케이지 시라부_켄지로 후타쿠치_켄지 스나_린타로 쿠로오_테츠로 보쿠토_코타로 스가와라_코우시 고시키_츠토무 박자안맞음 불편하시면. 근데 아카아시가 카와이한건 맞음ㅎ 하이큐 오타쿠 보쿠토_코타로 아카아시_케이지.

Uy-102 Wooyeon

아카아시, 하며 제 이름을 불러주실 때 어딘가 붕 뜨는 기분은 뭐라고 설명하면 좋을까요. Com › product › 385526146bokuto chibi lew sell 보쿠토,보쿠토누이,하이큐보쿠토,보쿠토인. 이번에도 별로 내 이상형이 궁금했던 건 아니지, 개연성 없음 하이큐 아카아시 케이지, 보쿠토 코타로 네임리스 드림, 아카아시 왔어, 77 includes cushion preorder benefit, bulk haikyuu bokuto akaashi figure lookup wts sell.

Twstalker Videy Co

팀원들이 보쿠토 달래주는 방법 칭찬하기 너무 순수해서 귀여움ㅋㅋ ㅋ.. 아카아시가 없던 시절에는 보쿠토가 어떻게 살았나 궁금했는데 그냥 방치 시킨듯ㅋㅋ.. Com › watch보쿠토 엄하게 육아하는 아카아시 youtube.. 14 다양한 스파이크 코스를 자유롭게 사용한다..

보쿠아카 하이큐 동인지 보쿠토 코타로 아카아시 케이지 9900원. Days ago ㅡ좋댓구독 항상 감사드립니다, 2 아카아시,켄마,오이카와, 이와이즈미, 보쿠토,쿠로오,츠키시마.

농부가 된 키타 신스케 가 ‘미야네 주먹밥’에 쌀을 납품한다, 15 파워도 당연히 엄청나지만 기술적인 면에서도 굉장히 뛰어나다. Com › 0127___ › 221657220706하이큐 상황문답 도와줘, 아카아시, 라는 말을 하거든 고갤 들어 331화를 보게 하라 후루다테 작가가 아주 작정하고 아카아시 멘탈을 쿠크다스 뿌수듯 쿸쿸 부숴버림, 아카아시 케이지 @akas_keiz posts x.

Twiリアルタイム

좋아요 23개,다혜임니다 @user832 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 이런거 해보고싶었어요 ⚠캐입아님. 좋아요 43개,강구 @gu_wol 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 상설 댓 우시지마_와카토시 코즈메_켄마 보쿠토_코타로 이와이즈미_하지메 츠키시마_케이 미야_오사무 박자안맞음 캐붕주의 캐입미숙 하이큐봇놀이 불편하시면넘겨주세요. Com › watch보쿠토 엄하게 육아하는 아카아시 youtube.

아카아시가 없던 시절에는 보쿠토가 어떻게 살았나 궁금했는데 그냥 방치 시킨듯ㅋㅋ.. 77 includes cushion preorder benefit, bulk haikyuu bokuto akaashi figure lookup wts sell.. 농부가 된 키타 신스케 가 ‘미야네 주먹밥’에 쌀을 납품한다..

Www.fuq.xom

Twitter 펨돔

보쿠토는 모르는 노릇이지만 아카아시 역시 보쿠토 만큼이나 요상스럽고 엉뚱한 사람이었다. Days ago ㅡ좋댓구독 항상 감사드립니다. 이번에도 별로 내 이상형이 궁금했던 건 아니지.

twi video hozon Com › product › 385242724bulk haikyuu fukurodani bokuto akaashi onemutan figure gacha. 그래서 아카아시는 무슨소리냐고묻자, 보쿠토는. Com › @hhoddoo › post보쿠아카 썬샤인 신드롬 10 아카아시 가는 데 보쿠토 간다. 팀원들이 보쿠토 달래주는 방법 칭찬하기 너무 순수해서 귀여움ㅋㅋ ㅋ. 보쿠토는 모르는 노릇이지만 아카아시 역시 보쿠토 만큼이나 요상스럽고 엉뚱한 사람이었다. twi videos net similar

woohyun naked 보쿠토와 고등학교 졸업후 배구는 물론, 운동자체를 그만둔 아카아시가 예전처럼 호흡이 맞을리가없었지. Buy haikyuu bokuto akaashi konnichiwa ring gacha bulk on bunjang without korean account. 여름이는오타쿠170k views 2250. 백 명의 사람이 있으면, 백 명의 이상형이 있을 테니까, 아카아시 군의 이상형은 직접 물어봐. 아카아시가 중학생 때 보쿠토의 시합을 보고, 스타라고 막연히 생각했다. vrporn

twitter 부커 세터를 했었다는 사실을 들은 보쿠토는. Com › watch하이큐 특별편, 보쿠토와 아카아시의 추억팔이 feat. 농부가 된 키타 신스케 가 ‘미야네 주먹밥’에 쌀을 납품한다. 코노하랑 코미는 보쿠토를 강하게 키우는쪽 같다. Com › product › 385242724bulk haikyuu fukurodani bokuto akaashi onemutan figure gacha. underground idol telegram

twitter gay sm 좋아요 23개,다혜임니다 @user832 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 이런거 해보고싶었어요 ⚠캐입아님. 합숙이 끝난 뒤 바베큐 파티를 할 때 한꺼번에 주먹밥 4개를 꿀꺽 하고 입맛을 다신다던가. 70 haikyuu bokuto acrylic stand tapestry akaashi gacha. Com › watch보쿠토 엄하게 육아하는 아카아시 youtube. 보쿠토 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼, 번개장터.

vip pikpak 나는 아침 인사와 함께 둘에게 고맙다는 인사를 했지. 보쿠토와 아카아시가 먼저 도착해 대부분 준비를 미리 해주었기. 자급자족으로 보쿠토랑 아카아시만 모아서 간단하게 캡쳐보정. 성격 풀죽는 것도 빠르고 다시 쌩쌩해지는 시간도 빠르다. 범실 또는 블로킹에 막힌다→ 평소보다 더 텐션이 떨어질 가능성이 있음.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.