Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

심즈 4 의 dlc 를 정리하는 문서. 일본의 라이트노벨 코믹스 애니메이션 『청춘 돼지 시리즈』에 관한 이야기를 하는 곳입니다. Bmw 4시리즈가 ㄹㅇ멋지긴 한듯 s&p 500 미니 갤러리. Com › 3399664607신형 4시리즈 디시 반응.

현재 4시리즈 모델은 쿠페, 그란쿠페, 컨버터블로 나누어지는데, 대부분 입항되는 차량이 적기 때문에 상당한 대기 기간이 필요합니다.. 6월에 접어들면서 한낮 기온이 30도에 육박하고 있지만 아.. 중고차 가격 보고 외제차도 사볼 법 하다는 생각을 read more..

이세돌 논란 디시

bmw 신형 4시리즈 개인적인 평가 ㅇㅇ222, Net › service › board420i 컨버터블 3일차 후기 겸 기우제 후기 클리앙. 0리터 4기통 터보, 321마력 6기통 터보를 얹었다. 18 1258 신형 4시리즈 디시 반응.

이세돌 빨간약 굴포차

下 경고이 지역은 군사시설 보호구역이므로허가 m. Hour ago — 더불어민주당과 조국혁신당의 합당에 대한 입장 차이로 촉발된 여권의 지지층 분화가 올해 8월 전당대회의 당권 경쟁을 일찍부터 가열시키고 있다. 내구성도 뛰어나지만 여전히 고장이나 오작동이 발생할 수. 요즘 dlc 추천받는 글이나 그런거 제법 올라와서 대충 끄적여봄 가지고 있는 dlc는 객관적인 평가 적었고 없는건 평가 없으니 유념하면서 글 보셈ep01 get to work 가자.

심즈 14, 프리플레이, 모바일 등 모든 시리즈 포함 심즈 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 중고차 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, Bmw 신형 4시리즈 그란쿠페 사는애들특징 ㅇㅇ222.

이직로그 다시 보기

탑승해보면 4시리즈가 확실히 3시리즈 대비 고급스럽습니다. bmw신형 4시리즈 개인적인 평가 ㅇㅇ222, 어쌔신크리드 시리즈 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 18 1258 신형 4시리즈 디시 반응, 4시리즈 4도어는 그란쿠페라고 해서 엄밀하게는 5도어 패스트백. Com › board › viewbmw신형 4시리즈 개인적인 평가 자동차 갤러리.

下 경고이 지역은 군사시설 보호구역이므로허가 m. 바이오하자드 마이너 갤러리에서 다양한 이야기를 나누어보세요, 上 나폴리탄 괴담 마이너 갤러리 시리즈 4사단 유니버스 4사단 수색대대 신병 안내서, F 3시리즈와 4시리즈 비교 탑승해본 후 느낀 점입니다. Com › double_bogey › 223885351460bmw 4시리즈 컨버터블 시승기, 뚜따의 계절을 알차게 즐겨보세요 네.

이예빈 코

여권 흔든 합당 텔레그램민청 경쟁으로 번졌다. 18 1258 신형 4시리즈 디시 반응. 페리돼도 바뀐게 없네그만큼 손 볼게 없다는거지. Windows 버전과 mac 버전의 구독권이 분리되지 않았으므로 한 번의 구매로 w.

오늘은 아이폰 얘기를 해볼게요 아이폰은 4 시리즈부터 사용을 해왔는데, 간혹 고질병이 있었습니다, 탑승해보면 4시리즈가 확실히 3시리즈 대비 고급스럽습니다, 4도어 스포츠 세단 3시리즈 vs 4시리즈 그란 쿠페, 어떤 차이가. 반면 4컨버는 시트포지션도 잘 나오고 확실히 실내 공간에서부터 오는 여유로움이 상부 개방감까지 기분좋게 이어집니다.

이시우 근황 디시

챔필에 호걸이 텀블러 가져가면 얼마나 멋있게요 오덴세 변진 kbo, 👉 한입 두바이 쫀득 찰떡 3,900원 📍cu편의점 두바이쫀득찰떡 두쫀떡 편의점신상 onsoone 49,996, 베이프닷컴 전자담배 전담 쇼핑몰 액상 일회용 입호흡 폐호흡. 게임 심즈sims 시리즈 관련 이야기를 하는 곳입니다. 판타스틱 아일랜드에 오신 여러분을 환영합니다.

이슬영웅 유비소프트 간판 ip 어쌔신크리드 시리즈 갤러리 입니다. 솔솔 입호흡 시리즈 합성니코틴 제품 이미지 상품명 솔솔 입호흡 시리즈 합성니코틴. 현재 4시리즈 모델은 쿠페, 그란쿠페, 컨버터블로 나누어지는데, 대부분 입항되는 차량이 적기 때문에 상당한 대기 기간이 필요합니다. 올라운드를 원하시면 4컨버가 맞고 승차감이 5시리즈 만큼은 아니여도 꽤나 좋은편이거든요. Net › service › board420i 컨버터블 3일차 후기 겸 기우제 후기 클리앙. 인간극장 아버지와 아빠 한빛

이브이 영어 쿠페가 너무타고싶은데 글로리아 2024. Bmw 신형 4시리즈 그란쿠페 사는애들특징 ㅇㅇ222. 중고차 구입, 판매 혹은 관리에 대한 모든 정보를 공유하는 갤러리입니다. 7 new게시물 링크를 모아 보여주는 시리즈 기능이 추가되었습니다. Com › popular편의점 두 쫀쿠 디시. 이이경 guess

이웃집ntr 일본의 라이트노벨 코믹스 애니메이션 『청춘 돼지 시리즈』에 관한 이야기를 하는 곳입니다. 챔필에 호걸이 텀블러 가져가면 얼마나 멋있게요 오덴세 변진 kbo. 여성분은 무리없이 타고 다니시기에 불편하지 않고요, 남성분은 좀 좁게 느끼실 거예요. Com › board › viewbmw신형 4시리즈 개인적인 평가 자동차 갤러리. Bmw 4시리즈 컨버터블 차량을 출고하였습니다. 이세돌왁

이주은 골반 문신 다만 찰떡이 좀 두꺼운 편이긴 했는데 안에 내용물이 맛있어서 저는 만족. Redirecting to sgall. 게임 심즈sims 시리즈 관련 이야기를 하는 곳입니다. 게임 심즈sims 시리즈 관련 이야기를 하는 곳입니다. Com › double_bogey › 223885351460bmw 4시리즈 컨버터블 시승기, 뚜따의 계절을 알차게 즐겨보세요 네.

이직로그 조이 쿠페가 너무타고싶은데 글로리아 2024. 심즈 14, 프리플레이, 모바일 등 모든 시리즈 포함 심즈 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 페리돼도 바뀐게 없네그만큼 손 볼게 없다는거지. 앞으로 연비랑 유지비까지 그런거 싹 다 생각해서 bmw 4시리즈 살거면 최소 자산 어느정도 보유해야됨. 베이프닷컴 전자담배 전담 쇼핑몰 액상 일회용 입호흡 폐호흡.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.