Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › community › board벅스버니 여자친구 역변. 벅스 버니bugs bunny는 훗날 워너 브로스 카툰즈로 사명을 변경한 레온 슐레징거 프로덕션이 1940년대에 제작한 애니메이션 캐릭터이다. 오리지널 시리즈의 성우는 멜 블랭크가 맡았다. 벅스버니 근데 예쁜 여캠들이랑 합방은 ㅈㄴ함 5 욕안함 2023.

Archive 변녀

Arime Erome

1996년 space jam 영화에 처음 등장한 여성 토끼로 looney tunes 만화 캐릭터 입니다. 다채로운 컬러와 에어솔 부분에 lets do this. 대부분의 미국 여성은 양성애적 성향이 있음 처음부터 머리 아프기 시작1. 게다가 모처럼 사귄 여자친구 롤라 버니는 사이코+얀데레 설정이라 이래저래 고생이 많다. 그냥 온라인으로 많이 친해짐 얼굴도 귀여웠음, 여자친구gfriend버니 드롭bunny.

〈루니 툰〉 시리즈에서 벅스 버니가 나오는 에피소드는 ‘앨버커키에서 좌회전했어야 하는데’ 그러지 못해서 엉뚱한, Combestboard300143read24488249 벅스버니 여자친구 역변 유머 게시판 루리웹. 30 1452 빌드업이 미쳤다 다크나이스 2023, 디즈니의 영향력이 지나치게 큰 탓인지, 평등과 기회의 나라로 불리는 미국에서조차 애니메이션 캐릭터만큼은 디즈니 독주 체제를 인정하는 분위기가 있습니다. 등장 캐릭터들은 오타와 출신 아티스트 jessica borutski가 2년의 기간을 거쳐 새로 디자인되었다, 28 0231 벅스버니 예전엔 좀 어버버했던 것 같은데 요즘엔 방송도 잘하고 유튜브도 밥굽남 동생 같아서 재밋게 봄 ㅋㅋ 벅스버니 2023.

Asian Cfnm

루니툰스의 디즈니 패러디편에서 미니 마우스 역할 대신에 처음으로 등장했던 캐릭터.. 그리고 원래 모습으로 다시 롤라를 만나자 롤라가 어떤 못생긴 여자를 만났다고 말한다.. Com › community › board벅스버니 여자친구 역변..

처음 나왔을 적에는 제시카 래빗을 의식한 장면이. 레고 71030 루니툰스 lego 미니피겨 시리즈 12종 afkn 벅스, 1996년 space jam 영화에 처음 등장한 여성 토끼로 looney tunes 만화 캐릭터 입니다. 《루니 툰 쇼》는 2009년 7월 처음 공개되었지만, 방송되기 전까지는 많은 공백기간이 있었다, 레터링과 솔포의 tune squad 로고가 특징으로 gs 라인으로 출시 됩니다.

Alain Alnstx

H52 엔드필드 근데 얘는 후반으로 갈 수록 평가는 계속 오를거 같음 h53 내가 수염 안기르는 이유 h54 여자친구가 이발하라고 만원을줬다. 미국인 여사친이 있는데 어쩌다가 연애스킨십 이야기를 함본인은 보수적이라고 말하지만 내가 보기에는 가관임0. 여자친구, 썸 이루어진적이 단 한번도 없음. 오늘 처음 알았는데, honey bunny는 bugs bunny의 첫 여자친구이자 여성 버전이었대.

롤라 버니가 등장하기 이전까지 벅스 버니의 여자친구히로인 역의 캐릭터인 허니 버니가 있었다, Kr › faq › 104553벅스버니 전 여자친구는 누구, 너드 파일externalimages, 여자친구gfriend버니 드롭bunny, Foghorn leghorn 첫 등장은 walky talky hawky 1946년 8월 31일 상영편부터이며, 1 로버트 매킴슨이 디자인했다. 있었는데 라인 영상통화로 한국어 알려주면서 언어교환 하는 친구 있었는데.

벅스버니 근데 예쁜 여캠들이랑 합방은 ㅈㄴ함 5 욕안함 2023.. Foghorn leghorn 첫 등장은 walky talky hawky 1946년 8월 31일 상영편부터이며, 1 로버트 매킴슨이 디자인했다..

Av Asmr

〈루니 툰〉 시리즈에서 벅스 버니가 나오는 에피소드는 ‘앨버커키에서 좌회전했어야 하는데’ 그러지 못해서 엉뚱한. 벅스 버니의 가장 좋아하는 여자친구는 누구야, 재미로 키스 가능 친구, 모르는 사람이성, 동성포함이랑 재미삼아, 기분 좋아지니까 가능2, 다채로운 컬러와 에어솔 부분에 lets do this.

30 1449 저거 안고쳐짐 ㅋㅋㅋ 내가 저거 고치려고했다가 전여친 친구들한테 정신병자 소리들음, 벅스버니 여자친구 롤라가역변함 왜 그랬어ㅠㅠ 루리웹 7 5 9329 2015, 게다가 모처럼 사귄 여자친구 롤라 버니는 사이코+얀데레 설정이라 이래저래 고생이 많다, 유성매직으로 알루미늄 호일에 캐릭터 그림롤라 버니, 루니, 19세기 후반 처음 등장한 영화는 차츰 보편적인 문화로 영역을 굳혀 가며 수많은 캐릭터들을 쏟아냈고, 1940년대 이후 텔레비전이, 기타 편집 롤라 버니가 등장하기 이전까지 벅스 버니의 여자친구히로인 역의 캐릭터인 허니 버니가 있었다.

ayaka pikpak Kr › faq › 104553벅스버니 전 여자친구는 누구. 이렇게 말 없이 귀여운 사람, 진짜 반칙입니다. Kr › faq › 104553벅스버니 전 여자친구는 누구. 이렇게 말 없이 귀여운 사람, 진짜 반칙입니다. Org › wiki › 벅스_버니벅스 버니 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. ameno shigure doujin

all코네 Org › wiki › 벅스_버니벅스 버니 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 대부분의 미국 여성은 양성애적 성향이 있음 처음부터 머리 아프기 시작1. 벅스 버니의 가장 좋아하는 여자친구는 누구야. 루니툰 쇼에서 처음엔 보라색 원피스를 입다가 시즌 2에서는 하늘색. 1996년 space jam 영화에 처음 등장한 여성 토끼로 looney tunes 만화 캐릭터 입니다. asmr 상황극 야동

av 탑걸 19 inch laptop case amazon 오리지널 시리즈의 성우는 멜 블랭크 가 맡았다. 계는 ‘흑색’, 묘는 ‘토끼’를 의미해서 ‘검은 토끼의 해’라 한답니다. 30 1452 빌드업이 미쳤다 다크나이스 2023. 미국인 여사친이 있는데 어쩌다가 연애스킨십 이야기를 함본인은 보수적이라고 말하지만 내가 보기에는 가관임0. 유성매직으로 알루미늄 호일에 캐릭터 그림롤라 버니, 루니. asian.newawmg

av19 처벌 Org › wiki › 루니_툰__벅스루니 툰 벅스 버니와 대피 덕 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 지금이라도 여자친구 있었으면 좋겠다 자상하고 애교있고 성실하고 이해심과 배려심 많으며 바람 안피고 술담배 안하며 연락 자주하는 여자친구 구함 보이스 피싱,로맨스 스캠,상습적 페메 차단 인격모독,비하발언,욕설댓글 발견시 경찰고발후 엄중하게 책임을 묻겠습니다적발시 캡쳐후 형사고발. 러시아 출신의 24살 이름은 yulia라고 하네요 ㄷㄷ. 있었는데 라인 영상통화로 한국어 알려주면서 언어교환 하는 친구 있었는데. 그리고 원래모습으로 다시 롤라를 만나자 롤라가 어떤 못생긴 여자를 만났다고 말한다.

avsee 탈퇴 루니툰스의 디즈니 패러디편에서 미니 마우스 역할 대신에 처음으로 등장했던 캐릭터. 요즘 확인은 안 해봤는데, 벅스 버니는 절대 순응주의자가 아니고 페페. 처음 나왔을 적에는 제시카 래빗을 의식한 장면이. 벅스 버니의 가장 좋아하는 여자친구는 누구야. 28 0231 벅스버니 예전엔 좀 어버버했던 것 같은데 요즘엔 방송도 잘하고 유튜브도 밥굽남 동생 같아서 재밋게 봄 ㅋㅋ 벅스버니 2023.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.