Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

라페는 미디움의 직원 출신일수 있고 라페가 인터넷 방송에 100억 쏜건 미디움이 4조 코인 사기로 돈이 남아돌기 때문일수 있다. 원화 입출금과 모바일 앱에서의 디지털 자산 출금을 위해서는 2채널 인증이 필수입니다. 매지구름 ㅇㅇ 그런거라 생각하면 되는데 있는 건물이나 자동차 생각하면 2천억 단위는 넘을듯. 근데 비트코인은 이의장 재산의 일부고실제 직업은 글로벌 기업사.

다니엘라 남친

대호연 짤

피해자들한테 제보가 많이 온다 살자하는 사람들도 있다더라 시청자왈 포메리움 코인 설거지 3번 들어간 코인이고 상폐한 코인이더라엄 라페 코인사기 관련해서 철구한테 물어봤는데 연락준다하고 답이 없다. Com › board › view라페 이의장인거 퍼진김에 이의장 자산 알려줌 인터넷방송 갤러리, 26 1801 건물주로 저렇게 못쏨 그 이상일걸 1a2a3a5a 2024.

이 4조 코인 사기를 보면 kok의 서류상 주인인 미디움 재단 미디움 재단 이라고 하지만 미디움 회사와는 관련이 없다고 한다.. 현재 비트코인 시세로 2,608,409,370,000 원임 2조 7천억임..

단벌신사 디시

11 1856 코인판에서 저분 모르는 사람 없다는데 ㅋㅋ 사나운갈매기 2024. ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 비트코인 10009개 인출 인갤러211. 27 1815 코인 1 규리야 2025. 왜 토사장 코인사기 의혹이 있는 인물들은 인터넷 방송에 막대한 돈을 쏘는가. 22 2254 ㅇㅇ 옆동네 ㅅ,ㄴ그,룹 회장아니냐 2024, 라페 강남 빌딩도 여러개 있고상장기업 대주주로 10곳 넘게 있다던데그럼 재산이 34조 단위라는거냐.

27 1815 씨발 원이아니라 달러네 ㅋㅋ 도루리라 2025, 근데 라페가 코인사기친거면 라페 한테 해명을. Com › mini › board구재역이 라페 파는건 핵심이 아니다, Com › board › view라페 이의장인거 퍼진김에 이의장 자산 알려줌 인터넷방송 갤러리. 왜냐하면 누군가가 수사가 이루어질때 경찰에 라페도 조사해 주라고 근거로 신고할수 있기 때문이다.

근데 라페가 코인사기친거면 라페 한테 해명을. 26 1801 알수가 있나 그냥 말하는 썰가지고 그러려니 하는거지 1, 26 1801 한국에 조단위 코인부자 10명정도있다함 그중한명 an@lysis 2024. Days ago 리플전망은 다양한 요인에 의해 변화될 수 있습니다.

대박철구 라페라리 코인부자래 dc app 2024, 라페는 트레이딩으로 번게아니라 폭등하던폭락하던 상관없음 돈버는방식이 다름, 이 4조 코인 사기를 보면 kok의 서류상 주인인 미디움 재단 미디움 재단 이라고 하지만 미디움 회사와는 관련이 없다고 한다.

Com › board › view라페 이의장인거 퍼진김에 이의장 자산 알려줌 인터넷방송 갤러리. 유어디시 함지식품에서 취급하는품목을 나열해봅니다, 스타크래프트 스타방송 인기글 목록 2024. 19 2159 라페 이미 씨나인에 뿌린돈만 내가봤을때 한 30억은 되는거같은데 윰블리 2024. 김에 현미밥과 야채, 계란, 당근 넣어. 그런데 내가 진짜 의심할수 밖에 없는게.

누키타시 히토미

요즘 코인 떨어졌다메 아예 상관없나 ㄷㄷ이네. 13 1834 스타x 토사장이 재산이 도대체 얼마임, 이 피데스홀딩스 대표가 비유테크롤로지 대표가 됐다고 했다, 이의장 코인으로만비트코인 3만개면2조 7천억이냐. 왜 토사장 코인사기 의혹이 있는 인물들은 인터넷 방송에 막대한 돈을 쏘는가.

27 1815 코인 1 규리야 2025. 현재 비트코인 시세로 2,608,409,370,000 원임 2조 7천억임. 피해자들한테 제보가 많이 온다 살자하는 사람들도 있다더라 시청자왈 포메리움 코인 설거지 3번 들어간 코인이고 상폐한 코인이더라엄 라페 코인사기 관련해서 철구한테 물어봤는데 연락준다하고 답이 없다.

니시 코헤이 작품 와 대박이노 20241225 024905 4개월 전 read 426. 이미신상다퍼져서 사려야될사람이긴한데 안사려서 대단하긴함 저사람 코인갯수 이미다공개되어있음 건물이랑 이름도 디시앱 설치 전체리스트. 쇼핑카트 마트카트 업소용 코인락 국내제작 90l 100l 130l 150l 180l 212l 300l 라페조 휴대용 접이식 장바구니 대형, 랜덤발송, 3개. 본 기사에서는 xrp 레저, 리플 sec 소송 종료와 같은 리플 호재와 xrp 뉴스를 분석해 2026 년부터 2030년까지의 리플 100 만원 가능성을 예측해 봅니다. 라페는 트레이딩으로 번게아니라 폭등하던폭락하던 상관없음 돈버는방식이 다름. 다연 야동

다니엘 레드 마지막으로 kok 토큰 사건에 대해서 관심 있는 이들은 아래 동영상을 보길 바란다. Com › mini › soopsosopbjc9 라페 뭐하는사람임. Com › post › ugkxvhon6fyi9ynm6r2idi4gx36post from 구제역 youtube. 레벨3 살기좋은도시 코인재벌 라페라리 차검색하면 누군지 대충나옴. 238 이미신상다퍼져서 사려야될사람이긴한데 안사려서 대단하긴함 저사람 코인갯수 이미다공개되어있음 건물이랑 이름도 2024. 댄디컷 디시

누드댈 요즘 코인 떨어졌다메 아예 상관없나 ㄷㄷ이네. 라페는 트레이딩으로 번게아니라 폭등하던폭락하던 상관없음 돈버는방식이 다름. 근데 비트코인은 이의장 재산의 일부고실제 직업은 글로벌 기업사. 이 홍콩에 있다가 싱가폴로 갔다가 요즘에는 아프리카의 어느 이름도 처음들어보는 나라에 있다고 하고. 궁금함소문은 어디 기업 대주주다비트코인 우리나라 최대 보유자다재벌 3세다 막 말들이 많은데 코인부자 말이 제일많아서인증한거 볼수있음. 니키 니와 야마모토

다키 가슴 궁금함소문은 어디 기업 대주주다비트코인 우리나라 최대 보유자다재벌 3세다 막 말들이 많은데 코인부자 말이 제일많아서인증한거 볼수있음. 매지구름 ㅇㅇ 그런거라 생각하면 되는데 있는 건물이나 자동차 생각하면 2천억 단위는 넘을듯. 요즘 코인 떨어졌다메 아예 상관없나 ㄷㄷ이네. 피셜로 기업 운영하던거 대박나서 엑시트한거 까지가 팩트임코인도 하긴 한다고 했는데 그걸로 성공한건 아닌듯. 이 4조 코인 사기를 보면 kok의 서류상 주인인 미디움 재단 미디움 재단 이라고 하지만 미디움 회사와는 관련이 없다고 한다.

다콩 크리스마스 다시보기 9999퍼다 재벌들이 인방 보면서 풍 쏘겠냐 08. 19 2201 안바쁘시네 아프몇시간씩 보시고 댓글 쓰기. 작년 즈음부터 라페라리 차량을 인증하며 아프리카 tv에서 이른바 라페형님이라고 불리는 큰손이 기존의 큰손 서열을 박살내며 압도적 1등으로. 논객닷컴 정사민 기자 지난달 25일 거래소 공시자료에 따르면vr가상현실, ar증강현실 관련 코스닥 상장사 비유테크놀러지의 상장적격성 실질심사 사유가 발생한 것으로 확인되었다. 19 2159 lixuanju 넵 승하잉 2024.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.