US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 5, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 5, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 5, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 5, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 5, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 5, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 5, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 5, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 5, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 5, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 5, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 5, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 5, 2026.
검색을 해보니 아이폰 버전에 대한 간략한 사용법만 나와있고 다른 프로필에서 배지를 찾아 누구의 사진이 진짜인지 알 수 있습니다. 17 이미지 아니 크랭크는 전프로자나 대회밸런스 안맞지 않음. 여기서 패션은 fashion옷맵시, 풍조이 아닌 passion고난이다. 1 사진은 kof 2002 um의 일러스트이다.
판티아cosplaybunbunfantia3004029 1. 15 1104 ㅇㅇ 뭔가 새벽반 유니 같은느낌임 지나가다 마주치면 연상되서 머기업들이 ㅈㄴ 좋아할듯 04, Passion fruit 수난 과일 한국에서는 이 패션 후르츠로 더 잘 알려져 있다.28 1842 와 오랜만이다 sana 2024.. Jpeg 0b6d48c6449d4b309752a6477449fda0.. 정액제 게임이었으나 2013년 부분유료 방식으로 과금 read more..
2 작중 확실히 언급되는 것은 아니지만, 쿠우가의 최종폼인 얼티밋 폼의 모습이나 능력 등이 운.. 마스코트는 프리파라 안에서 아이돌을 보좌하고 매니지먼트하는 매니저의 역할을 한다.. Png 파일pjc2023_phase2_sst.. 산리오 마이멜로디 프로필 사진, 귀여운 마이멜로디 사진, sanrio my melody 사진 리포포 판티아 마티와 준영의 사랑 고백..
Com › board › view리포포 실물, 단면 사진 영어 breadfruit 빵이 열리는 나무는 아니고 열리는 열매를 구우면 나는 냄새와 주식으로 쓰인다는 점이 빵과 같다고 붙은 이름이다, 정액제 게임이었으나 2013년 부분유료 방식으로 과금 read more. 판티아 최고등급이 10만원이시네 대신 모든 신체가 나오지만 뷰는 모자이크다 인듯. 단면 사진 영어 breadfruit 빵이 열리는 나무는 아니고 열리는 열매를 구우면 나는 냄새와 주식으로 쓰인다는 점이 빵과 같다고 붙은 이름이다.
검색을 해보니 아이폰 버전에 대한 간략한 사용법만 나와있고 다른 프로필에서 배지를 찾아 누구의 사진이 진짜인지 알 수 있습니다. 여기서 패션은 fashion옷맵시, 풍조이 아닌 passion고난이다. 뭔 개소리야 난 인방안보고 인스타만 팔로우하는데 인스타에 판티아 사진 홍보올리는거 보고 말한건데 판티아 구독이나 좀 해줘라 dc app. Png 파일pjc2023_phase2_sst, 오늘은 앨범추천 대신 시디 인증으로 하겠습니다.
조명빨, 각도 걸러졌을때 딱 이런느낌 원본 첨부파일 2 본문 이미지 다운로드 ceb03eea55f44198a6512e9d696d6b25, 검색을 해보니 아이폰 버전에 대한 간략한 사용법만 나와있고 다른 프로필에서 배지를 찾아 누구의 사진이 진짜인지 알 수 있습니다. 저번에 우울하다면서 글 다 지워서 지금은 남아있는 사진 없음, 2 작중 확실히 언급되는 것은 아니지만, 쿠우가의 최종폼인 얼티밋 폼의 모습이나 능력 등이 운. 1 사진은 kof 2002 um의 일러스트이다. 블루홀bluehole에서 개발, 한게임에서 서비스 했었고, 2016년 1월 26일부로 넥슨으로 이관되어 서비스하는 mmorpg.
| 오늘은 앨범추천 대신 시디 인증으로 하겠습니다. | 지금 리포포 인스타랑 트위터에는 사진 많이 지워져있는데. |
|---|---|
| Keywords 마티, 준영, 리포포 판티아, 마티 남자친구, 유준영, 준영 여자친구, 마티 cctv, 사랑 고백, 태권도, 감동, 이별, 열정, 사랑, 감정. | 조명빨, 각도 걸러졌을때 딱 이런느낌 원본 첨부파일 2 본문 이미지 다운로드 ceb03eea55f44198a6512e9d696d6b25. |
| Passion fruit 수난 과일 한국에서는 이 패션 후르츠로 더 잘 알려져 있다. | 산리오 마이멜로디 프로필 사진, 귀여운 마이멜로디 사진, sanrio my melody 사진 리포포 판티아 마티와 준영의 사랑 고백. |
Jpeg 0b6d48c6449d4b309752a6477449fda0. Redirecting to sgall. 28 1842 와 오랜만이다 sana 2024, 저번에 우울하다면서 글 다 지워서 지금은 남아있는 사진 없음, Com › @yjy_02_1112 › video리포포 판티아 마티와 준영의 사랑 고백 tiktok.
1 사진은 kof 2002 um의 일러스트이다. 블루홀bluehole에서 개발, 한게임에서 서비스 했었고, 2016년 1월 26일부로 넥슨으로 이관되어 서비스하는 mmorpg. 판티아cosplaybunbunfantia3004029 1 avjb, 전정국 빙의글 애욕愛慾 02 키슈밀 정국의 얼굴을 정면에서 마주하는 건, 18 1033 오늘 올라온 사진 보니까 가난컨셉+수영복이네 일상생활에서 다 평범하게 옷입고있는데 혼자 수영복입고 있는 컨셉 이런거 개인적으로 별로 안좋아하는데 ㅠㅠ 이미 찍은거 어쩔수 없으니 예쁘게나 나왔으면 좋겠다 ㅠㅠ 목록 스크랩 0 댓글. 지금 리포포 인스타랑 트위터에는 사진 많이 지워져있는데.
f95zone fashion business 마스코트는 프리파라 안에서 아이돌을 보좌하고 매니지먼트하는 매니저의 역할을 한다. 15 1107 ㅇㅇ 판티아하는구나 근데 뭐 이쁘니까 알플 상위버전 정도로 보면 괜찮을. 판티아cosplaybunbunfantia3004029 1 avjb. Com › mgallery › board요새 내 취향인 스트리머들jpg 치지직 마이너 갤러리. Png 파일pjc2023_phase2_sst. fc2 엄지수
fc2ppv3611004 뭔 개소리야 난 인방안보고 인스타만 팔로우하는데 인스타에 판티아 사진 홍보올리는거 보고 말한건데 판티아 구독이나 좀 해줘라 dc app. 15 1107 ㅇㅇ 판티아하는구나 근데 뭐 이쁘니까 알플 상위버전 정도로 보면 괜찮을. 판티아 최고등급이 10만원이시네 대신 모든 신체가 나오지만 뷰는 모자이크다 인듯. 28 1842 와 오랜만이다 sana 2024. 28 1842 아니 이분 방송은 안그런데 인스타그램은 많이 공격적이시네 판티아 하시는구나. fc2 초코
fc2love 판티아 최고등급이 10만원이시네 대신 모든 신체가 나오지만 뷰는 모자이크다 인듯. 전정국 빙의글 애욕愛慾 02 키슈밀 정국의 얼굴을 정면에서 마주하는 건. Passion fruit 수난 과일 한국에서는 이 패션 후르츠로 더 잘 알려져 있다. 판티아 최고등급이 10만원이시네 대신 모든 신체가 나오지만 뷰는 모자이크다 인듯. 전정국 빙의글 애욕愛慾 02 키슈밀 정국의 얼굴을 정면에서 마주하는 건. fc2 ppv 1855975
f95zone deepfake 판티아cosplaybunbunfantia3004029 1. 판티아cosplaybunbunfantia3004029 1 avjb. 검색을 해보니 아이폰 버전에 대한 간략한 사용법만 나와있고 다른 프로필에서 배지를 찾아 누구의 사진이 진짜인지 알 수 있습니다. 늘 몰래 뒤에서 훔쳐보느라 급급했었는데, 그는 이런 얼굴을 하고 있구나. 조명빨, 각도 걸러졌을때 딱 이런느낌 원본 첨부파일 2 본문 이미지 다운로드 ceb03eea55f44198a6512e9d696d6b25.
f95zone villain Redirecting to sgall. Jpeg 0b6d48c6449d4b309752a6477449fda0. Com › board › view리포포 실물. 판티아 최고등급이 10만원이시네 대신 모든 신체가 나오지만 뷰는 모자이크다 인듯. Jpeg 0b6d48c6449d4b309752a6477449fda0.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 5, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 5, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 5, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 5, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
지금 리포포 인스타랑 트위터에는 사진 많이 지워져있는데., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.