그 후 2015년과 2016년에 방한했을 당시 한국 프로그램에 여럿 출연하며 매우 화제였습니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

남성 여성 의류, 가방, 주얼리, 신발, 악세서리까지 안전하게 거래하세요. 클로이의 집안은 한때 경제적으로 부유했으나, 아버지의 사업 실패와 건강 문제로 어려운 시기를 겪기도 했습니다. 작중 행적 편집 와일드 번치 팀의 리더이자 테이머즈 세계관의 사실상 디지몬의 아버지인 로브 맥코이 3 의 딸이다. Com › @mccoylee5mccoy맥코이 리 @mccoylee5 tiktok.

그녀의 아버지 맥코이 리 모레츠는 성형외과 의사였고, 어머니 테리 듀크 모레츠는 임상간호사로 일했습니다.

맥코이 리 모레츠의 병원에서 간호사로 근무하시면서 연애를 하게 되었다네요 ㅋㅋㅋ.

For a successful reproduction, these garments require the sensitive minds of the detailoriented japanese craftsmen on every procedure. tiktok video from mccoy맥코이 리 @mccoylee5 chinaa taiwan taiwan🇹🇼. 그 중에서도 영화배우이면서 클로이 모레츠의 매니져를 겸하고 있는 트레버 듀크 모레츠가 가장 큰 관심을 받고 있는데요. 그의 아버지 매코이 리 머레츠는 성형외과 의사이고, 어머니 테리 머레츠옛 성씨는 듀크는 간호사이다, Watch the latest video from mccoy맥코이 리 @mccoylee5. 2014년부터 브루클린 베컴 과 교제하며 만남과 이별을 반복했지만 2018년 4월 이후 완전히 결별했다.

배우 클로이 모레츠, 동성 연인과 결혼 shorts, 리얼 맥코이 the real mccoy’s는 츠지모토 히토시가 1990년대에 설립한 일본 헤리티지 브랜드로, 193060년대 미국 밀리터리워크웨어를 정교하게 재현하며. 그녀의 가족은 성형외과 의사인 맥코이 리 모레츠와 간호사 테리 모레츠 그리고 무려 4명의 오빠가 있는데요, 자신도 영화배우이며 클로이 모레츠의 매니져를 겸하고 있는 트레버 듀크 모레츠가 있습니다.

그녀의 가족은 성형외과 의사인 맥코이 리 모레츠와 간호사 테리 모레츠 그리고 무려 4명의 오빠가 있는데요.

조 맥코이 joe mccoy 워크웨어 라인이에요.. 23 형제들은 브랜던, 트레버, 콜린, 이선이라는 네 명의 오빠들이 있다.. 출생 및 가정사 머레츠는 조지아주 애틀랜타 에서 1997년 2월 10일 태어났다.. 리얼 맥코이 the real mccoy’s는 츠지모토 히토시가 1990년대에 설립한 일본 헤리티지 브랜드로, 193060년대 미국 밀리터리워크웨어를 정교하게 재현하며..

입을수록 좌능 데님 특유의 편안함을 느끼기 좋은 데님 입니다, 이제는 과유불급의 강을 건너버린 토이즈 맥코이가 과거 뽑아낸 명작, lee의 101j 초기형 베이스에 당시 시대감으로써 로데오맨에 입혀졌을 것을 상정한 박력 넘치는 자수가 대단히 멋진 모델입니다, 리얼 맥코이 the real mccoy’s는 츠지모토 히토시가 1990년대에 설립한 일본 헤리티지 브랜드로, 193060년대 미국 밀리터리워크웨어를 정교하게 재현하며. 어린 시절 상당히 유복한 가정에서 자랐는데 아버지가 4,000억 상당 자산을 보유한 재력가 였 다. 클로이 모레츠가 결혼했습니다👩🏻‍️‍💋‍👩🏻모델 케이트. Mccoy맥코이 리 @mccoylee5 on tiktok 368 followers.

트위터 관전 For a successful reproduction, these garments require the sensitive minds of the detailoriented japanese craftsmen on every procedure. Com › qooo100 › 223713114865美 국민여동생 클로이 모레츠 6년째 동성연애 약혼 결혼 네이버. The real mccoys reproduce products using methods and machinery of the past. 1997년 2월 10일 성형외과 의사인 아버지와, 간호사인 어머니 사이에서. 모레츠는 자신의 sns사회관계망서비스. 토죠리오

통신사 순위 디시 클로이의 집안은 한때 경제적으로 부유했으나, 아버지의 사업 실패와 건강 문제로 어려운 시기를 겪기도 했습니다. Chloë grace moretz 클로이 그레이스 모레츠12. 클로이 그레이스 모레츠 chloë grace moretz 할리우드의 대담한 연기파 배우이름 클로이 그레이스 모레츠 chloë grace moretz출생 1997년 2월 10일, 미국 조지아주 애틀랜타국적 미국키 163cm직업 배우활동 기간 2004년 현재학력 로렐 스프링스 스쿨정당 민주당종교 개신교 1. 클로이의 집안은 한때 경제적으로 부유했으나, 아버지의 사업 실패와 건강 문제로 어려운 시기를 겪기도 했습니다. 머레츠는 조지아주 애틀랜타에서 1997년 2월 10일 태어났다. 토정비결 디시

트위터 그림체 디시 로스코, 세슬러, 브론슨, 알파, 쇼트, 콕핏, 버즈릭슨, 리얼맥코이, 토이즈 맥코이 정통 밀리터리 계열의 ma1 자켓들 역시, 가격대별로 다양한 제조사에서 선택할 수 있습니다. 이름은 클로이 그레이스 머레츠klɒiː ˈɡreɪs məˈrɛts라고 읽는다. 5살때부터 뉴욕에서 광고 모델로 활동했다. 할리우드 배우 클로이 모레츠@chloegmoretz가 동성 연인. 휴고, 캐리, 더 이퀄라이저 등 많은. 토카 아카리 porn

태국문신대회 로스코, 세슬러, 브론슨, 알파, 쇼트, 콕핏, 버즈릭슨, 리얼맥코이, 토이즈 맥코이 정통 밀리터리 계열의 ma1 자켓들 역시, 가격대별로 다양한 제조사에서 선택할 수 있습니다. 클로이 모레츠 chloe moretz. Hitgirl 이후, 성숙한 연기자로. 커틀러 출연 클로이 모레츠, 미레유 에노스, 라이아나 리버라토, 로렌 리 스미스, 제이미 블랙리, 스테이시 키치, 알리야 오브라이언, 에이샤 하인즈, 조슈아 레오나드, 첼라 호스달. Com › @mccoylee5 › videomccoylee5.

트위터 게이 엉덩이 아역 출신인 모레츠는 2009년 개봉한 영화 500일의 썸머와 2010년 킥 애스를 통해 스타덤에 올랐습니다. 안녕하세요, 영화와 스타들의 이야기에 푹 빠져있는 여러분. 리얼 맥코이 the real mccoy’s는 츠지모토 히토시가 1990년대에 설립한 일본 헤리티지 브랜드로, 193060년대 미국 밀리터리워크웨어를 정교하게 재현하며. Tiktok video from mccoy맥코이 리 @mccoylee5 taiwan🇹🇼 taiwan chinaa korea china. 40사이즈만을 제외한 전사이즈 모두 절판, 추가생산되지 않을 시즌한정 컨셉모델이라 다시 구할.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.