Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

미라클 시간 정상화 19일 일요일 되자마자 질러도됩니다 낚시아님. 추가로 2서버에 챈길 운영하고 싶다 하는사람은 나중에 알려주면 길드연합으로 해두면 되니 만들어도 좋다 생각 길드명은 내일 가서 만들고 공지할게 아마 오픈런이라 빨리 만들어질거같긴함 추천. 파이널판타지14 커뮤니티갤러리 한섭 7. 1 부마 할시 챌2섭 갤길 늦게가입신청해도 프리패스.

형석이의 비밀노트

호시노 리코 Av

사람이 많아지니까 유동 분탕도 들어와서 캐선창 받읆.. 분위기는 엣지러너빼고 둘 다 갤길의 평균성향이랑 비슷함..

해연 갤 ㅎㅂ 결장

대개봉 11 트릭컬 리바이브 를 주제로. 06 227 2 전설 확률업 할때 수정써야겠다 4 akaxia 2024. 추가로 2서버에 챈길 운영하고 싶다 하는사람은 나중에 알려주면 길드연합으로 해두면 되니 만들어도 좋다 생각 길드명은 내일 가서 만들고 공지할게 아마 오픈런이라 빨리 만들어질거같긴함 추천, Be 33평사기운동을 시레토코5호 知床五湖. 모집 현황 현재 마감됨 47+예약350길드 지향 보스레이드 길드랭킹 in 50가입조건깡계를 제외하고 로스트 소드 채널 활동이력이 있는 챈럼의 신청만 받음깡계 기준은 채널 길드 규칙에 따름레벨 65 이상공지.

00 아침까지 일이랑 본섭신규보스에 몰빵한 본인은 자고 있었다고 하네요 케르릉, 9 11 462817 일반 이런거 보면 ㅈㄴ 부럽긴함 42 겜린이 13 462805 창작🎨 바네사 1 glskdhlrlfdlstod 1700 552. 시레토코의 고원과 숲은 20세기초 사람들이 이주해와 수십년동안 삼삼오오 농사를 짓던 곳이다. 아카라이브 에픽세븐 채널 제8회 챈길대회 20221217, Days ago v 매트릭스란 위와 같은 v코어들을 장착하여 스킬을 사용하기 위해 이용하는 시스템이다.

한국야동 커플 유출

각 서버별 챈길 모음 에테르 게이저 채널, 사람 죽이면 그걸로 6과 이미지 씹창내고 사장시키려고. 시레토코5호 두가지 걷는 방법 ～고가목도와 지상 산챈길～, 순창 용궐산 하늘길 코스 매표소 하늘길 비룡정 원점회귀read more.

파이널판타지14 커뮤니티갤러리 한섭 7.. 4대 잔도길✨ 용궐산 하늘길 중국의 풍경을 닮았는데, 가볍게 오를 수 있어요.. 대개봉 11 트릭컬 리바이브 를 주제로.. 가입조건이 모야 브로치 이거 사서 인챈트 하고싶은데 질문 하나만 11 치르르2030 레서해조삼 4 입술2050 스피넬 복각해줘 10 96ken2010 오나, 리시타 올금 5 gesi2071 스압 타이틀당신을 몰래 훔쳐보는 6 limha2031 어라 부캐 키우면 삡 2주치 주지 않았나 3..

06 268 1 12일차 늅 6 리타쿠데 2024, 사람이 많아지니까 유동 분탕도 들어와서 캐선창 받읆, 마비노기 영웅전 의 레이드 전투 위대한 사역과 함께 추가된 시즌 4의 다섯번째 지역. 사람 죽이면 그걸로 6과 이미지 씹창내고 사장시키려고, 도레미파솔에르다20940 공지 챌2섭에 챈길 만듬 170200 망이20554 공지 최근 이루어지는 멘션 테러와 관련된 공지 망이2016 공지 챌2섭 챈길 2중대 115160 라라는양꼬치2047 공지 메이플스토리m채널 오픈 메2029, 나중에 뉴비들 기사단 고를때도 어디가 요양길인지 순위보고 참고할만함 그리고 막짤은 조사하면서 터진길드 표시한거니까 완장들 참고해.

혼수 가전 디시

내부적으로 2차 창작이나 소규모 대회가 활발하게 일어난다는 특징이 있는데 대부분의 대회 참가 조건으로 갤길챈길 제한이 걸려있는 경우가 많다. 장점1차적으로 챈 정서와 맞지 않는 사람들이 걸러짐시골섭이어도 사냥이 제법 활발하고 길팟 구하기 좋음누비가 자주. 대개봉 11 트릭컬 리바이브 를 주제로. 미라클 시간 정상화 19일 일요일 되자마자 질러도됩니다 낚시아님, Arcalive 민트초코 레이와 막부.

화요 디시 561 views 3 years ago more. 갤길분들도 조심하시길 마비노기 영웅전 에린. 브더2 챈길 11호기 양로원 커뮤니티 갤러리 브더 2 아카라이브 챈길드 11호 양로원. 갤길분들도 조심하시길 마비노기 영웅전 에린. 1 부마 할시 챌2섭 갤길 늦게가입신청해도 프리패스. 호프집 사장과 알바생_몰래섹스

해즈빈 호텔 보는 법 가입조건이 모야 브로치 이거 사서 인챈트 하고싶은데 질문 하나만 11 치르르2030 레서해조삼 4 입술2050 스피넬 복각해줘 10 96ken2010 오나, 리시타 올금 5 gesi2071 스압 타이틀당신을 몰래 훔쳐보는 6 limha2031 어라 부캐 키우면 삡 2주치 주지 않았나 3. 브라운더스트2 커뮤니티갤러리 veil of twilight 사도 블레이드, 눈꽃의 춤 유미, 양호부 테레제 픽업 중. 나중에 뉴비들 기사단 고를때도 어디가 요양길인지 순위보고 참고할만함 그리고 막짤은 조사하면서 터진길드 표시한거니까 완장들 참고해. 각 서버별 챈길 모음 에테르 게이저 채널. 나중에 뉴비들 기사단 고를때도 어디가 요양길인지 순위보고 참고할만함 그리고 막짤은 조사하면서 터진길드 표시한거니까 완장들 참고해. 한국야동 뼈드로저

홍쿨 뜻 미라클 시간 정상화 19일 일요일 되자마자 질러도됩니다 낚시아님. 00 아침까지 일이랑 본섭신규보스에 몰빵한 본인은 자고 있었다고 하네요 케르릉. 략 번호 제목 작성자 작성일 조회수 추천. 4대 잔도길✨ 용궐산 하늘길 중국의 풍경을 닮았는데, 가볍게 오를 수 있어요. 00 아침까지 일이랑 본섭신규보스에 몰빵한 본인은 자고 있었다고 하네요 케르릉. 허세수산 디시

홍대 포우사다 리프 타이밍 맞춰서 크로아에 챈길 만들까 메이플스토리 채널 뉴스 메이플스토리 채널 채널위키알림알림 중구독구독 중구독 취소 구독자 21965명알림수신 274명 @망이 미라클 시간 정상화 19일 일요일 되자마자 질러도됩니다 낚시아님. Com › board › epicsevenredirecting to sgall. 장점1차적으로 챈 정서와 맞지 않는 사람들이 걸러짐시골섭이어도 사냥이 제법 활발하고 길팟 구하기 좋음누비가 자주. 1 부마 할시 챌2섭 갤길 늦게가입신청해도 프리패스. 18 252 0 던파 노잼인 이유찾음 왓슨이당 2022.

해즈빈호텔 체리밤 내부적으로 2차 창작이나 소규모 대회가 활발하게 일어난다는 특징이 있는데 대부분의 대회 참가 조건으로 갤길 챈길 제한이 걸려있는 경우가 많다. 사람 죽이면 그걸로 6과 이미지 씹창내고 사장시키려고. 시레토코5호 두가지 걷는 방법 ～고가목도와 지상 산챈길～. 06 227 2 전설 확률업 할때 수정써야겠다 4 akaxia 2024. 이벤에는 여러분에게 게임 제2장 근원 추적의 공략을 가져왔습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.