Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Missing sotwe, 空 wikipedia4. 0比4不敌日本队，u23国足球员道歉！ 主教练鸣不平！ 球迷鼓励：已经很棒了. 小叔s @xiaoshu1s1 twitter profile. 175k followers, 153 following.

야스닷컴 시청 처벌

압솔룸 암호는_

알리샤 뉴먼 온리팬스 디시

就像你的私人教练，随时为你加油打气，给你实用的建议和小技巧。 这支持不仅是在你刚开始的时候， 而是一直陪着你，帮你保持动力，克服.. 小叔s @xiaoshu1s1 twitter profile.. Cc › archives 推特富二代八块腹肌体育生 sy mengnan689 51吃瓜网..

야동 Span

0比4不敌日本队，u23国足球员道歉！ 主教练鸣不平！ 球迷鼓励：已经很棒了.. Com › lovechinese1709 nana sha @lovechinese1709 twitter profile sotwe.. Com › lovechinese1709 nana sha @lovechinese1709 twitter profile sotwe.. 16 in bkk ｜no telegram..

黑皮纹身网黄swang被肌肉教练强制爱，大肉棒狠操骚穴，力量感满满视觉盛宴 纹身黑皮抖着挨操，教练巨力顶到失神，想当swang被强制，还是想当教练狠顶？. 巨根教练mb @zhea18cmtop twitter profile. 健身教练，为了业绩甘愿做奴被操。凡是今天进我福利群 的将不收取任何费用，24h免费对我的粉丝们限时无门槛 进入，可观看所有视频和写真！ 领取方式 ：st. 大雕健身教練@niuna_i twitter profile.

애비게일 스펜서

这也太帅了吧我的妈呀给大家推荐一个全网最大的看片app 成千上万部完整版每日更新每天免费看3部包年才100元一天3毛钱精虫上脑的时候看这个app不比其他的强嘛家人们谁懂 read more, 金靖均 金靖均註 1 （韓語： 김정균，又译 金正均2，1985年12月23日—，游戏id： kkoma），是一位韩国 英雄联盟 职业教练，曾担任 skt战队 主教练长达七年时间。. 就像你的私人教练，随时为你加油打气，给你实用的建议和小技巧。 这支持不仅是在你刚开始的时候， 而是一直陪着你，帮你保持动力，克服. 金靖均 金靖均註 1 （韓語： 김정균，又译 金正均2，1985年12月23日—，游戏id： kkoma），是一位韩国 英雄联盟 职业教练，曾担任 skt战队 主教练长达七年时间。.

야살 디시 Missing sotwe, 空 wikipedia4. 健身教练，为了业绩甘愿做奴被操。凡是今天进我福利群 的将不收取任何费用，24h免费对我的粉丝们限时无门槛 进入，可观看所有视频和写真！ 领取方式 ：st. 健身教練william徐偉霖日前捲入桃色糾紛，被新婚妻子揭發在健身室內偷食小薯茄阿冰細妹吳泳。至今日（28日）下午，william被發現在長沙灣長沙灣宇晴軒的寓所內燒炭自殺，其後昏迷送院搶救。 william向朋友發尋死訊息 消息指，william於下午向朋友發whatsapp訊息，指因為感情問題不開心有輕生念頭. 健身教練william徐偉霖日前捲入桃色糾紛，被新婚妻子揭發在健身室內偷食小薯茄阿冰細妹吳泳。至今日（28日）下午，william被發現在長沙灣長沙灣宇晴軒的寓所內燒炭自殺，其後昏迷送院搶救。 william向朋友發尋死訊息 消息指，william於下午向朋友發whatsapp訊息，指因為感情問題不開心有輕生念頭. 终于教练掰开逼接纳李哥的鸡巴 那被操到晃动的胸大肌和性感的8块腹肌，让一个个男人沦陷，抽插在他教练的骚逼里！这么性感的骚逼肌肉男恐怕以后无法再做1了，因为全网还有很多. 애널 품번

야동 뼈드로저 Personal trainer ｜ model ｜dm for collabs 12. 《金牌教练（电竞）》正文 第1章 特殊的omega病人 第2章 国家队 第3章 破局之法 第4章 回归的狙神 第5章 教练话语权 第6章 国家队队员 第7章 十字街角 第8章 心态崩了 第9章 素描大师 第10章 葫芦娃小分队 第11章 回国 第12章 新来的教练 第13章 毒舌教练 第14章 世界. Missing sotwe, 空 sotwe. Cc › archives 推特富二代八块腹肌体育生 sy mengnan689 51吃瓜网. 黑皮纹身网黄swang被肌肉教练强制爱，大肉棒狠操骚穴，力量感满满视觉盛宴 纹身黑皮抖着挨操，教练巨力顶到失神，想当swang被强制，还是想当教练狠顶？. 야벅지 디시

안아랑 구독 사진 디시 推特的脂包肌纹身教练mengnan6688 关键词：每日大乱斗 推特 mengnan6688 肌肉男 健身教练 肥臀 爆操 健身教练操女学员. Your personal sex trainer muscular asian here versatile here 本版有限制級敏感裸露，未滿18歲禁止觀賞，進入本網站視同已年滿18歲且願意觀賞. 健身教练，为了业绩甘愿做奴被操。凡是今天进我福利群 的将不收取任何费用，24h免费对我的粉丝们限时无门槛 进入，可观看所有视频和写真！ 领取方式 ：st. Gay版dou音，想看啥片都有，健身教练，体育生，名媛男模，大鸡巴00后，大鸡民工，白袜粗口，各类网黄，你想看的视频全都有 小蓝gv同志版、基圈后花园，看. 最新章节 第321章 最特别的那个 娱乐圈+直播综艺+玄学+全能大佬+苏爽宁梵作为初代神女，祭祀祈福，受万人敬仰，操劳几百年，终于在祭祀大典退位休息，却在千年后被晚辈唤醒。晚辈宁易舟在娱乐圈演技差脾气大，被全网黑得气运稀薄，连带着家族也岌岌可危。宁梵惊了，这是哪来的废物？. 야동스토어 국산

야살 니케 清华高颜值健身教练ellie 邀请儿子同学来家吃饭 故意勾引大鸡巴体育生. 陈教练@allerchen twitter profile. 小叔s @xiaoshu1s1 twitter profile. 🉑️🛰️ s19cm999 200送原创. 巨屌教练（接推广） @jacobxx22 twitter profile.

애널 fc2 Missing sotwe, 空 wikipedia4. 16 in bkk ｜no telegram. 听《the boytalk show》上小宇宙。 didn’t i tell you about yesterday. 健身教練william徐偉霖日前捲入桃色糾紛，被新婚妻子揭發在健身室內偷食小薯茄阿冰細妹吳泳。至今日（28日）下午，william被發現在長沙灣長沙灣宇晴軒的寓所內燒炭自殺，其後昏迷送院搶救。 william向朋友發尋死訊息 消息指，william於下午向朋友發whatsapp訊息，指因為感情問題不開心有輕生念頭. Horny coach運動教練@lion777724 twitter profile.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.