Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

결론 나가하마 미츠리는 건강미 넘치는 외모와 밝은 성격, 그리고 꾸준한 자기 관리로 팬들과 업계 관계자들로부터 사랑받는 배우입니다. 결론 나가하마 미츠리는 건강미 넘치는 외모와 밝은 성격, 그리고 꾸준한 자기 관리로 팬들과 업계 관계자들로부터 사랑받는 배우입니다. 최근 일본 여배우 겸 모델 나가하마 미츠리가 sns를 통해 다양한 일상 사진을 공개하며 팬들의 뜨거운 반응을 얻고 있습니다. 나가하마 미츠리는 2024년 상반기 일본 av계 최고의 신인으로 선정.

이다혜 딸감

유카리 시온

지역 주민조직 참여형 도시재생 단위사업 발굴 모델.. 일본 배우 나가하마 네루 1st 사진집.. 최근 일본 여배우 겸 모델 나가하마 미츠리가 sns를 통해 다양한 일상 사진을 공개하며 팬들의 뜨거운 반응을 얻고 있습니다.. 제주에어타고 나고야로 1일차는 6시넘어서 도착한 관계로 간단하게 저녁먹고 숙소가기로 센고쿠..

유히로 성형

Org › wiki › 요코하마_류세이요코하마 류세이 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.. 하지만 패션헬스의 서비스는 굉장히 무궁무진하죠 기본적으로 대신 자x행위를 도와주는 서비스가 있지만 여성이 메이드나 갸루, 바니걸, 기모노, 스튜어디스, 의사, 선생님, 정장, 간호사 등 여러 코스프레를 하고 실제로는 불가능에 가까운 여러가지 스토리로..

응디 무현

저녁도 드시면 참 좋은 시가현 여행이 되지요, 비가 엄청 쏟아지는데도 엄마와 딸까지 기모노를 입고 가족이 총 출동했네요. 비싼 값이 아깝지 않을 정도로 맛있어요, 결론 나가하마 미츠리는 건강미 넘치는 외모와 밝은 성격, 그리고 꾸준한 자기 관리로 팬들과 업계 관계자들로부터 사랑받는 배우입니다.

불타오르는 신인 나가하마 미츠리 짤방. 다이어트 유니꿀tip 식단x, 먹고싶은거 다먹으며 30. 나가하마 미츠리, 꾸안꾸부터 오프숄더까지 ‘팔색조 매. 심볼마크는 2009년 헤이세이 21년 개항 150주년을 계기로 만들어졌다. 나가하마 미츠리, 꾸안꾸부터 오프숄더까지 ‘팔색조 매.

이 맹둥 꼭지 나가하마시를 본격적으로 보기위해 오테몬거리의 아케이드 시장으로 발길을 돌렸는데주차장부터 기모노차림의 사람들이 많이 보이는게 무슨 축제라도 있는것 같네요하지만 하늘에선 비가 멈출기미조차 안보이는군요. 프롤로그 블로그 내일도 유럽 ︎ 내일도 오세아니아 ︎ 내일도 아시아 ︎ 피드메이커 3기 여행 안부. 저도 그렇고 다른사람들도 보통 배우들을 볼때 몸매나 혹은 비주얼을 보고 판단을 많이 하게 되는데 저는 기본적적으로 글래머한 몸매를 좋아하고 비주얼은 섹시한 느낌이 들지만 웃상을 가진 배우상을 좋아하는편이에요 그래서 오늘 소개할 배우 나가하마. 제주에어타고 나고야로 1일차는 6시넘어서 도착한 관계로 간단하게 저녁먹고 숙소가기로 센고쿠. 순환트램 만들고 시청사 옮겨왔더니 텅빈 도심에 발길 북적. 윤잉 asmr nude

이맹둥 야동 저녁도 드시면 참 좋은 시가현 여행이 되지요. 하지만 요금은 일본답게 편도가 1,300엔이 넘는 무시무시한 가격인데. 나가하마 미츠리의 베스트 작품 회원들이 뽑은 베스트 작품 입니다. 일주일만에 오런완🏃🏻‍♀️ 서하마 하프마라톤 신청 성공. 이 곳에 위스키를 만드는 증류소가 있다. 이맹둥꼭지노출

윤공주 메롱 바 그럼 옛 일본의 신비가 고스란히 살아있는 나가하마로의 여행, 지금부터 만나보실까요 교토역에서 나가하마역까지는 기차로 1시간 가량 걸려요. 여행, 비즈니스 등으로 나하을 방문하신 외국인 관광객이 안심하고 이용하실 수 있는 일본의 패션헬스을 소개합니다. 체력훈련과 교정운동을 통한 비거리향상. 지역 주민조직 참여형 도시재생 단위사업 발굴 모델. 피트니스 클럽 옥내풀장, 헬스클럽, 사우나, 토탈케어살롱 ※ 리노베이션 공사에 의해 피트니스 클럽이 휴관합니다. 윤상인대 절제술 디시

윤공주 javrank Yoasobi heaven는 일본에서 가장 유명한 풍속. Com › 299아이포케 1월 신인 나가하마 미츠리 실물공개. 그녀의 성실한 태도와 끊임없는 노력은 앞으로의 성장 가능성을 더욱 기대하게 합니다. ㄹㅇ 에타에 올라 온 인하대 학생회 똥군기 폭로글 에타에 인하대 건축학부 학생회에서 1학년을 대상으로음주를 강요하고 신체적 접촉과 협박을 가했고 그 결과 반강제적인 음주에 의해서 사고를 당한 1학년이 있다는 폭로글이 올라옴 원본은 디시에 올라왔다 지워짐에타에서 논란이 계속 되었고. 비가 엄청 쏟아지는데도 엄마와 딸까지 기모노를 입고 가족이 총 출동했네요.

유학생을위한 하우스를 공유하십시오 일본 배우 나가하마 네루 1st 사진집. 하지만 요금은 일본답게 편도가 1,300엔이 넘는 무시무시한 가격인데. 당신의 골프를 무조건 바꿔드립니다 read more. 프롤로그 블로그 내일도 유럽 ︎ 내일도 오세아니아 ︎ 내일도 아시아 ︎ 피드메이커 3기 여행 안부. Yoasobi heaven는 일본에서 가장 유명한 풍속.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.